Cost efficient robust global supply chain system design under uncertainty

  • Abdulaziz T. Almaktoom
  • Krishna K. Krishnan
  • Pingfeng Wang
  • Samir Alsobhi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Brutal competitions in today’s global supply chain have forced business enterprises to focus attention on their supply chains. These issues have guided this research to introduce a supply chain service level measure and develop a novel robust design optimization (RDO) approach to assure service level rate requirements and minimize total service level costs. A supply chain system design must maintain its efficiency over time while coping with the uncertainty in production and transportation. Unexpected delay in the product flow can render the supply chain system inefficient with respect to service level costs. Analytical models for the determination of the risk involved in a supply chain system design are difficult to derive when uncertainty is involved in the supply chain. In this paper, the service level rate measure approach is detailed first. Then, the methodology for the robust design optimization-based approach is provided. Two case studies are performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed service level measure and developed robust design optimization model. Results from the two case studies have shown that by implementing the developed robust design optimization approach, a system is able to achieve a 90 % service level rate while minimizing performance cost and uncertainty impact.

Keywords

Supply chain system Service level rate Robust design optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bals L, Jensen PDØ, Larsen MM, Pedersen T (2013) Exploring layers of complexity in offshoring research and practice, The Offshoring Challenge. Springer, pp. 1–18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tang O, Nurmaya Musa S (2011) Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 133:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Beamon BM (1998) Supply chain design and analysis: models and methods. Int J Prod Econ 55:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaynak H, Hartley JL (2008) A replication and extension of quality management into the supply chain. J Oper Manag 26:468–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chiadamrong N, Prasertwattana K (2006) A comparative study of supply chain models under the traditional centralized and coordinating policies with incentive schemes. Comput Ind Eng 50:367–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Merschmann U, Thonemann UW (2011) Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: an empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. Int J Prod Econ 130:43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pettersson AI, Segerstedt A (2013) Measuring supply chain cost. Int J Prod Econ 143:357–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kurata H, Nam S-H (2010) After-sales service competition in a supply chain: optimization of customer satisfaction level or profit or both? Int J Prod Econ 127:136–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Madu CN, Kuei C, Madu IE (2002) A hierarchic metric approach for integration of green issues in manufacturing: a paper recycling application. J Environ Manag 64(3):261–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robinson CJ, Malhotra MK (2005) Defining the concept of supply chain quality management and its relevance to academic and industrial practice. Int J Prod Econ 96(3):315–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kuei C-H, Madu CN, Lin C (2008) Implementing supply chain quality management. Total Qual Manag 19(11):1127–1141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mentzer JT, Myers MB, Cheung M-S (2004) Global market segmentation for logistics services. Ind Mark Manag 33:15–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Billington C, Callioni G, Crane B, Ruark JD, Rapp JU, White T, Willems SP (2004) Accelerating the profitability of Hewlett-Packard’s supply chains. Interfaces 34:59–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Farasyn I, Humair S, Kahn JI, Neale JJ, Rosen O, Ruark J, Tarlton W, Van de Velde W, Wegryn G, Willems SP (2011) Inventory optimization at Procter & Gamble: achieving real benefits through user adoption of inventory tools. Interfaces 41:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chapman RL, Soosay C, Kandampully J (2003) Innovation in logistic services and the new business model: a conceptual framework. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 33:630–650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Knemeyer AM, Murphy PR (2004) Evaluating the performance of third‐party logistics arrangements: a relationship marketing perspective. J Supply Chain Manag 40:35–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lambert DM, Knemeyer AM, Gardner JT (2004) Supply chain partnerships: model validation and implementation. J Bus Logist 25:21–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Millen R, Sohal A, Moss S (1999) Quality management in the logistics function: an empirical study. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 16:166–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Argüelles VI, Casielles RV, Martín AMD, del Río Lanza AB (2002) Quality and safety in industrial markets: influence of the relationship between supplier and buyer. Eur J Manag Bus Econ 11(11):23–48Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chu LY, Shen Z-JM (2010) A power-of-two ordering policy for one-warehouse multiretailer systems with stochastic demand. Oper Res 58(2):492–502MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Funaki K (2012) Strategic safety stock placement in supply chain design with due-date based demand. Int J Prod Econ 135(1):4–13MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Li P, Chen H, Che A (2013) Optimal batch ordering policies for assembly systems with guaranteed service. Int J Prod Res 51(20):6275–6293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodriguez MA, Vecchietti AR, Harjunkoski I, Grossmann IE (2014) Optimal supply chain design and management over a multi-period horizon under demand uncertainty. Part I: MINLP and MILP models. Comput Chem Eng 62:194–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yue D, You F (2013) Planning and scheduling of flexible process networks under uncertainty with stochastic inventory: MINLP models and algorithm. AIChE J 59(5):1511–1532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    You F, Grossmann IE (2010) Integrated multi‐echelon supply chain design with inventories under uncertainty: MINLP models, computational strategies. AIChE J 56(2):419–440Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gebennini E, Gamberini R, Manzini R (2009) An integrated production–distribution model for the dynamic location and allocation problem with safety stock optimization. Int J Prod Econ 122(1):286–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Farahani RZ, Elahipanah M (2008) A genetic algorithm to optimize the total cost and service level for just-in-time distribution in a supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 111(2):229–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sawik T (2015) On the risk-averse optimization of service level in a supply chain under disruption risks. Int J Prod Res. (ahead-of-print), 1–16Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Manzini R, Gamberi M, Gebennini E, Regattieri A (2008) An integrated approach to the design and management of a supply chain system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(5–6):625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barry J (2004) Supply chain risk in an uncertain global supply chain environment. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 34:695–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Christopher M, Mena C, Khan O, Yurt O (2011) Approaches to managing global sourcing risk. Supply Chain Manag: Int J 16:67–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Klibi W, Martel A, Guitouni A (2010) The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review. Eur J Oper Res 203:283–293CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Waters D (2011) Supply chain risk management: vulnerability and resilience in logistics. Kogan Page PublishersGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Meixell MJ, Gargeya VB (2005) Global supply chain design: a literature review and critique. Transp Res E: Logist Transp Rev 41:531–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Harland C, Knight L, Lamming R, Walker H (2005) Outsourcing: assessing the risks and benefits for organisations, sectors and nations. Int J Oper Prod Manag 25:831–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Khan O, Burnes B (2007) Risk and supply chain management: creating a research agenda. Int J Logist Manag 18:197–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Manuj I, Mentzer JT (2008) Global supply chain risk management. J Bus Logist 29:133–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Rao S, Goldsby TJ (2009) Supply chain risks: a review and typology. Int J Logist Manag 20:97–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Simangunsong E, Hendry L, Stevenson M (2012) Supply-chain uncertainty: a review and theoretical foundation for future research. Int J Prod Res 50:4493–4523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Christopher M, Peck H (2004) Building the resilient supply chain. Int J Logist Manag 15:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kleindorfer PR, Saad GH (2005) Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Prod Oper Manag 14:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tang CS (2006) Perspectives in supply chain risk management. Int J Prod Econ 103:451–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Wagner SM, Bode C (2006) An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability. J Purch Supply Manag 12:301–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Santoso T, Ahmed S, Goetschalckx M, Shapiro A (2005) A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty. Eur J Oper Res 167:96–115MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Azaron A, Brown K, Tarim S, Modarres M (2008) A multi-objective stochastic programming approach for supply chain design considering risk. Int J Prod Econ 116:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Yu C-S, Li H-L (2000) A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. Int J Prod Econ 64:385–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shi N, Song H, Powell WB (2014) The dynamic fleet management problem with uncertain demand and customer chosen service level. Int J Prod Econ 148:110–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Benyoucef L, Xie X, Tanonkou GA (2013) Supply chain network design with unreliable suppliers: a Lagrangian relaxation-based approach. Int J Prod Res 51:6435–6454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Garvin DA (1984) What does product quality really mean. Sloan management review 26Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Parasuraman A, Zeithaml VA, Berry L (2004) SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Retail: Crit Concepts Bk2(64):140Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Kleijnen JP, Smits MT (2003) Performance metrics in supply chain management. J Oper Res Soc 54:507–514CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Otto A, Kotzab H (2003) Does supply chain management really pay? Six perspectives to measure the performance of managing a supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 144:306–320CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Mollaeian E (2012) Evaluating performance supply chain by a new non-radial network DEA model with fuzzy data. Science 2012:9Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Gunasekaran A, Patel C, Tirtiroglu E (2001) Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Harrington TS, Kirkwood DA, Srai JS (2012) Performance metric selection methodology for multi-organizational service network integration. J Appl Manag Entrep 17:20–35Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Tu J, Choi KK, Park YH (1999) A new study on reliability-based design optimization. Trans Am Soc Mech Eng J Mech Des 121:557–564Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hwang K-H, Lee K-W, Park G-J (2001) Robust optimization of an automobile rearview mirror for vibration reduction. Struct Multidiscip Optim 21:300–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design: engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs. UNIPUB/Kraus International Publications New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Taguchi G, Phadke MS (1988) Quality engineering through design optimization, quality control, robust design, and the Taguchi method. Springer, pp. 77–96Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Yadav OP, Bhamare SS, Rathore A (2010) Reliability‐based robust design optimization: a multi‐objective framework using hybrid quality loss function. Qual Reliab Eng Int 26:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Phadke MS (1995) Quality engineering using robust design. Prentice Hall PTRGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Chen W (1998) Quality utility—a compromise programming approach to robust design. University of IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Eggert R, Mayne R (1993) Probabilistic optimal design using successive surrogate probability density functions. J Mech Des 115:385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kang Z, Bai S (2013) On robust design optimization of truss structures with bounded uncertainties. Structural and multidisciplinary optimization, 1–16Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Shi W, Liu Z, Shang J, Cui Y (2013) Multi-criteria robust design of a JIT-based cross-docking distribution center for an auto parts supply chain. Eur J Oper ResGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Gu D-W, Petkov PH, Konstantinov MM (2013) Robust control of a hard disk drive, robust control design with MATLAB®. Springer, pp. 249–290Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kim BJ, Cheon SS, Lee JH, Lee HB, Jung DY (2013) A study on the vibration characteristics of the optical structure in the aerial vehicle and optimisation using robust design. Appl Mech Mater 302:462–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Althoff EA, Wang L, Jiang L, Giger L, Lassila JK, Wang Z, Smith M, Hari S, Kast P, Herschlag D (2012) Robust design and optimization of retroaldol enzymes. Protein Sci 21:717–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Bayat Y, Pourmortazavi SM, Ahadi H, Iravani H (2013) Taguchi robust design to optimize supercritical carbon dioxide anti-solvent process for preparation of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12-hexanitro-2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12-hexaazaisowurtzitane nanoparticles. Chem Eng J 230:432–438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Pishvaee M, Razmi J, Torabi S (2012) Robust possibilistic programming for socially responsible supply chain network design: a new approach. Fuzzy Sets Syst 206:1–20MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Pan F, Nagi R (2010) Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput Oper Res 37:668–683CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Simchi-Levi D, Wang H, Wei Y (2013) Increasing supply chain robustness through process flexibility and strategic inventoryGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Pishvaee MS, Rabbani M, Torabi SA (2011) A robust optimization approach to closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Appl Math Model 35:637–649MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Baghalian A, Rezapour S, Farahani RZ (2013) Robust supply chain network design with service level against disruptions and demand uncertainties: a real-life case. Eur J Oper Res 227:199–215MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hasani A, Zegordi SH, Nikbakhsh E (2012) Robust closed-loop supply chain network design for perishable goods in agile manufacturing under uncertainty. Int J Prod Res 50:4649–4669CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Lalmazloumian M, Wong KY, Govindan K, Kannan D (2013) A robust optimization model for agile and build-to-order supply chain planning under uncertainties. Ann Oper Res, 1–36Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Amin SH, Zhang G (2013) A three-stage model for closed-loop supply chain configuration under uncertainty. Int J Prod Res 51:1405–1425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Krishnan KK, Jithavech I, Liao H (2009) Mitigation of risk in facility layout design for single and multi-period problems. Int J Prod Res 47:5911–5940CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdulaziz T. Almaktoom
    • 1
  • Krishna K. Krishnan
    • 2
  • Pingfeng Wang
    • 2
  • Samir Alsobhi
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Operations and Information ManagementEffat UniversityJeddahSaudi Arabia
  2. 2.Department of Industrial and Manufacturing EngineeringWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations