Advertisement

Characteristics analysis of cellular bucket brigades with different constraints

ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

Cellular bucket brigade (CBB) is known as the self-organizing and self-balancing production system, but in different constraints, its self-organizing feature also presents different characteristics. According to constraints of station, this article divides the CBB system into three types: (1) CBB-1, no obvious location, in which an arbitrary position can be an exchange of work; (2) CBB-2, location limited, in which any place can be a transition; and (3) CBB-3, location limited, which cannot be exchanged within the stations. Then, the corresponding mathematical models are established to analyze the performance of the CBBs. At last, numerical simulation provides the following results: Both CBB-1 and CBB-2 have only one balance point and good convergence from any states to balance point, while the balance point of CBB-3 is of uncertainty.

Keywords

CBB Self-organizing Balance Station constraint Numerical simulation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bartholdi JJ, Eisenstein DD, Lim YF (2010) Self-organizing logistics systems. Annu Rev Control 34(1):111–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bartholdi JJ III, Eisenstein DD (1996) A production line that balances itself. Oper Res 44(1):21–34CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bratcu AI, Dolgui A (2005) A survey of the self-balancing production lines (“bucket brigades”). J Intell Manuf 16(2):139–158CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yong P, Peng T, Jiang F (2004) Study on “bucket brigades” line with return speeds. J Syst Eng 19(6):647–652 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bartholdi JJ III, Eisenstein DD, Foley RD (2001) Performance of bucket brigades when work is stochastic. Oper Res 49(5):710–719CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liu Y-h, Zuo D-w, Zhang D (2014) Modeling and balance point characteristics of bucket brigades assembly line. J South China University Technol Nat Sci Ed 42(4):111–117, (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bratcu AI, Dolgui A (2009) Some new results on the analysis and simulation of bucket brigades (self-balancing production lines). Int J Prod Res 47(2):369–387CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bartholdi JJ, Eisenstein DD, Lim YF (2006) Bucket brigades on in-tree assembly networks. Eur J Oper Res 168(3):870–879MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armbruster D, Gel ES (2006) Bucket brigades revisited: are they always effective? Eur J Oper Res 172(1):213–229CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Armbruster D, Gel ES, Murakami J (2007) Bucket brigades with worker learning. Eur J Oper Res 176(1):264–274CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lim YF (2011) Technical note—cellular bucket brigades. Oper Res 59(6):1539–1545MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lim Y F. Order-picking by cellular bucket brigades: a case study. In: Warehousing in the global supply chain. Springer: London, 2012: 71-85Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lim YF, Wu Y (2014) Cellular bucket brigades on U-lines with discrete work stations. Prod Oper Manag 23(7):1113–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bartholdi JJ III, Bunimovich LA, Eisenstein DD (1999) Dynamics of two-and three-worker “bucket brigade” production lines. Oper Res 47(3):488–491CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Martelli M (1992) Discrete Dynamical Systems and Chaos (Longman Scientific and Technical). Longman, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringTongji UniversityShanghaiChina

Personalised recommendations