Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

State-of-the-art on vibratory finishing in the aviation industry: an industrial and academic perspective

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Vibratory finishing is a versatile process that is used in many industries globally for radiusing, brightening, deburring, fine finishing, cleaning, burnishing, and descaling of components. This state-of-the-art paper will discuss how vibratory finishing has evolved into what it is today and the advancements in technology. The development of mass finishing, the importance of vibratory finishing in aviation industry, the parameters involved in this process, and the patent landscape of the advancements in vibratory finishing will be elucidated. More importantly, the paper will dwell into attempts made to understand the science behind this arcane process. Empirical investigations, model developments, bulk and granular impact velocity studies, vibrostrengthening, and Almen strip characterization are the research efforts that will be discussed in particular. This work has identified gaps in the vibratory finishing process, some of them being media flow measurement and the need for a monitoring system to determine the frequency losses from motor vibrations to the media vibrations. Methods for calculating the frequency and amplitude of machine vibrations, the impact velocity of media, and the force of media striking the workpiece are still under research. Literature points out that more work can be done in terms of the quantification of process parameters, the relationship between them, and the effect they have on the surface finish. The industry is on the lookout for shorter cycle times with improved surface finishing quality, and thus various technological advancements in vibratory finishing, namely drag and spindle finishing, have come into existence. To the knowledge of the authors, there has been no comprehensive review work done on vibratory finishing. This paper attempts to serve the purpose of being a one-stop academic and industrial reference for scientific communities and professionals working in this field. The paper further endeavors to serve as a means to initiate the development of a next generation vibratory finishing system with real-time monitoring and surface finish measurements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yabuki A, Baghbanan MR, Spelt JK (2002) Contact forces and mechanisms in a vibratory finisher. Wear 252:635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidson DA (2008) Vibratory finishing: versatile, effective, and reliable. Met Finish 106:30–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gillespie LK (2007) Mass finishing handbook. Industrial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kittredge J (1998) Understanding vibratory finishing revisited. Prod Finish 62:8

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tulinski EH (1994) Mass finishing. In: ASM International (ed) ASM Handbook. vol. 5, pp. 118–125

  6. Kenton T (2009) The future of mechanical surface finishing. Metal Finishing. p. 22

  7. Davidson DA (2007) Surface condition impacts part performance. Burrs, edges can negatively influence function of components. Met Finish 105:22–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rawlinson P (2012) Does size matter. Metal Finishing News. vol. 13

  9. Holzknecht E (2009) Everything you need to know about mechanical/mass finishing. Met Finish 107:27–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Müller B (2010) Surface finishing of large and delicate work pieces. Single part processing in tub vibrators. Metal Finishing News. vol. 11

  11. Roto-Finish H (2013) V-Max® from Hammond Roto-finish: the latest evolution in Spiratron® deburring technology. Met Finish 111:52–53

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rawlinson P (2011) Faster finishing: high speed vibratory mass finishing shorter process times/high material removal. Metal Finishing News. vol. 12

  13. Domblesky J, Cariapa V, Evans R (2003) Investigation of vibratory bowl finishing. Int J Prod Res 41:3943–3953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nebiolo B (2005) The basics of vibratory bowl set-up. Prod Finish 70:41–45

    Google Scholar 

  15. Davidson DA (2003) Developments in mass finishing technology. Met Finish 101:49–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangid M, Stori J, Ferriera P (2011) Process characterization of vibrostrengthening and application to fatigue enhancement of aluminum aerospace components—part I. Experimental study of process parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Davidson DA (2007) Green mass finishing with dry abrasive and polishing media. Met Finish 105:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davidson JS, Hammond JP, Elmblad KJ, Quick SW (2014) High-speed mass finishing device and method. US20140065929 A1

  19. van Kleef EA, Southorn M (2014) Mass finishing apparatus and method. US20140227944 A1

  20. Schroeter G, Velten M, Goertz V (2012) Grinding or polishing apparatus and method for operating it. US 20120021674 A1

  21. Sroka G, El-Saeed O (2011) Magnetic fixture. US 20110117820 A1

  22. Marcus RS, Mercurio RN (1989) Apparatus and process for vibratory finishing of parts. US4823513 A

  23. Sroka G, El-Saeed O, Reeves F (2010) High throughput finishing of metal components. US20100288398 A1

  24. Hashimoto F, DeBra DB (1996) Modelling and optimization of vibratory finishing process. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 45:303–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang S, Timsit RS, Spelt JK (2000) Experimental investigation of vibratory finishing of aluminum. Wear 243:147–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Domblesky J, Evans R, Cariapa V (2004) Material removal model for vibratory finishing. Int J Prod Res 42:1029–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Uhlmann E, Dethlefs A, Eulitz A (2014) Investigation of material removal and surface topography formation in vibratory finishing. Procedia CIRP 14:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar PP, Sathyan S (2012) Simulation of 1D abrasive vibratory finishing process. Adv Mater Res 565:290–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Doody RJP (1984) Application of microprocessor-control techniques to vibratory-finishing machines. J Mech Work Technol 10:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Baghbanan MR, Yabuki A, Timsit RS, Spelt JK (2003) Tribological behavior of aluminum alloys in a vibratory finishing process. Wear 255:1369–1379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sofronas A, Taraman S (1979) Model development and optimization of vibratory finishing process. Int J Prod Res 17:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Naeini SE, Spelt JK (2009) Two-dimensional discrete element modeling of a spherical steel media in a vibrating bed. Powder Technol 195:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Naeini SE, Spelt JK (2011) Development of single-cell bulk circulation in granular media in a vibrating bed. Powder Technol 211:176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Uhlmann E, Dethlefs A, Eulitz A (2014) Investigation into a geometry-based model for surface roughness prediction in vibratory finishing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75:815–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ciampini D, Papini M, Spelt JK (2007) Impact velocity measurement of media in a vibratory finisher. J Mater Process Technol 183:347–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hashemnia K, Mohajerani A, Spelt JK (2013) Development of a laser displacement probe to measure particle impact velocities in vibrationally fluidized granular flows. Powder Technol 235:940–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hashemnia K, Spelt JK (2014) Particle impact velocities in a vibrationally fluidized granular flow: measurements and discrete element predictions. Chem Eng Sci pp. 123–135

  38. Sangid M, Stori J, Ferriera P (2011) Process characterization of vibrostrengthening and application to fatigue enhancement of aluminum aerospace components-part II: process visualization and modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53:561–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ciampini D, Papini M, Spelt JK (2008) Characterization of vibratory finishing using the Almen system. Wear 264:671–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ciampini D, Papini M, Spelt JK (2009) Modeling the development of Almen strip curvature in vibratory finishing. J Mater Proc Tech 209:2923–2939

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rolls-Royce@NTU Corporate Lab, c/o School of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    R. Mediratta & K. Ahluwalia

  2. School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Nanyang Technological University, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore

    S. H. Yeo

Authors
  1. R. Mediratta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Ahluwalia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. H. Yeo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. H. Yeo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mediratta, R., Ahluwalia, K. & Yeo, S.H. State-of-the-art on vibratory finishing in the aviation industry: an industrial and academic perspective. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85, 415–429 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7942-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7942-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation