Advertisement

Formability analysis for enhancing forming parameters in AA8011/PP/AA1100 sandwich materials

  • K. Logesh
  • V. K. Bupesh Raja
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Sandwich materials are gaining recognition for applications requiring lightweight yet strong materials. A sandwich material with AA8011 and AA1100 as skin material and polypropylene was prepared using roll-joining process. Tensile tests were performed on specimens cut with 0°, 45°, and 90° orientation with respect to rolling direction. The test revealed that 0° orientation had superior mechanical properties than other two specimens. Flexural tests were taken on three specimens. It was found that the specimens were having relatively good load-bearing capabilities. Erichsen cupping test was taken on the specimen and was observed that it could resist and withstand low-velocity impact loads. From the tests, it was concluded that the prepared specimen can be used for applications such as automotive body panels, bonnets, and dashboards.

Keywords

Sandwich material Discontinuous production method Erichsen Flexural Tensile strength 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Palkowski H, Lange G (2005) Austenitic sandwich materials in the focus of research, Metalurgija - Journal of Metallurgy, AME, 2nd International Conference Deformation Processing and Structure of Materials, Belgrade, Serbia and Montenegro, 26–28 May 215–224Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vlot A, Vogelesang LB, De Vries TJ (1999) Towards application of fiber-metal laminates in large aircraft. Aircr Eng Aerosp Technol 71(6):558–570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sinmazçelik T, Avcu E, Bora MÖ, Çoban O (2011) A review: fibre metal laminates, background, bonding types and applied test methods, materials and design 32, 3671–3685Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botelho EC, Silva RA, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2006) A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mater Res 9(3):247–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kopp R, Nutzmann M, Van Santan J (2005) Formability of lightweight, vibration damping and medium perfused sandwich sheets, Springer pp 723–732Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Botelho EC, Silva RA, Pardini LC, Rezende MC (2006) A review on the development and properties of continuous fiber/epoxy/aluminum hybrid composites for aircraft structures. Mate Res 9(3):247–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim KJ, Rhee MH, Choi B-I, Kim C-W, Sung C-W, Han C-P, Kang K-W, Won S-T (2009) Development of application technique of aluminum sandwich sheets for automotive hood. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10(4):71–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rajkumar GR, Krishna M, Narasimha Murthy HN, Sharma SC, Vishnu Mahesh KR (2012) Investigation of repeated low velocity impact behaviour of GFRP/aluminium and CFRP/aluminium laminates. Int J Soft Comput Eng (IJSCE) 1(6):2231–2307Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sexton A, Venkatesan S, Cantwell W, Kalyanasundaram S (2012) ECCM15—15th European Conference on Composite Materials, Venice, Italy, 24–28 June, 1–8Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gresham J, Cantwell W, Cardew-Hall MJ, Compston P, Kalyanasundaram S (2006) Drawing behaviour of metal-composite sandwich structures. Compos Struct 75:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sugun BS, Rao RMVGK, Venkatasubramanyam DV (2008) Cost-effective approach for the manufacture of fibre metal laminates (FML), Proceedings of the International Conference on Aero Science and technology, Bangalore, India, 26–28 June, 1–5Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tzetzis D, Hogg PJ (2008) Experimental and finite element analysis on the performance of vacuum-assisted resin infused single scarf repairs. Mater Des 29:436–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Baumert EK, Johnson WS, Cano RJ, Jensen BJ, Weiser ES (2011) Fatigue damage development in new fibre metal laminates made by the VARTM process. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 34(4):240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Loos AC, Tuncol G, Long K, Cano RJ (2010) Development and verification of a model of the resin infusion process during manufacture of fiber metal laminates by VARTM, The 10th International Conference on Flow Processes in Composite Materials (FPCM10) Monte Verità, Ascona, CH, 11–15 July, 37–42Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jensen BJ, Cano RJ, Hales SJ, Alexa JA, Weiser ES, Loos AC, Johnson WS (2009) Fiber metal laminates made by the VARTM process, 17th International Conference on Composite Materials, ICCM-17; Edinburgh; United Kingdom; 27–31 July, 1–9Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wu W, Abliz D, Jiang B, Ziegmann G, Meiners D (2014) A novel process for cost effective manufacturing of fiber metal laminate with textile reinforced PCBT composites and aluminum alloy. Compos Struct 108:172–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lemanski SL, Nurich GN, Langdon GS, Simmons MC, Cantwell WJ, Schleyer GK (2007) Behaviour of fiber metal laminates subjected to localised blast loading—part II: quantitative analysis. Int J Impact Eng 34(7):1223–1245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    TALAT (Training in Aluminium Application Technologies) Lecture 3701—formability characteristics of aluminium sheet, 22 Oct 2009, 1–29Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shin KS, Kim KJ, Choi SW, Rhee MH (1999) Mechanical properties of aluminium/polypropylene/aluminium sandwich sheets. Met Mater Int 5(6):613–618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hirose Y, Kojima M, Hayashi Y, Sudo C (1990) Bending performance of steel plastic steel laminated sheet. Adv Technol Plasticity 3:15–19Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ghali E (2010) Corrosion resistance of aluminium and magnesium alloys: understanding, performance, and testing, Wiley Series in Corrosion, Online ISBN: 9780470531778, 1–719Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Marciniak Z, Duncan JL, Hu SJ (2002) Mechanics of sheet metal forming (second edition), ISBN: 978-0-7506-5300-8, Elsevier 1–211Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kim KJ (2005) Plastic strain ratios and planar anisotropy of AA5182/polypropylene/AA5182 sandwich sheets. Int J of Auto Techol 6(3):259–268Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu J, Liu W, Xue W (2013) Forming limit diagram prediction of AA5052/polypropylene/AA5052 sandwich sheets, Elsevier. Mater Des 46:112–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dvořák M, Schwarzer E (2012) New methods testing of adhesion of the coating to sheet metal by bending. J Surf Eng Mater Adv Technol 2:61–64Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Automobile EngineeringSathyabama UniversityChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations