Skip to main content
Log in

Quality and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain under multi-manufacturer competition

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the pricing and quality decisions of a single product in a two-echelon supply chain with multi-manufacturer and a single retailer. The manufacturers compete for the quality of the product and sell through a common retailer with different retail prices. The demand at the market place is dependent on both the retail price and product quality. A centralized model is developed as the benchmark case. A Stackelberg structure is assumed, where the retailer is the leader who decides the retail prices of different brands of the product produced by the manufacturers, and the manufacturers are follower who set the product quality under Cournot and Collusion policies. A special case is considered where these retail prices are the same. We compare the optimal results under two different policies, each with two pricing strategies (same and different). A numerical example demonstrates the developed models and shows that the same pricing strategy is the worst one from the supply chain’s point of view while different pricing strategy is occasionally gainful from consumer’s point of view.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abad PL (1994) Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive. Eur J Oper Res 78(3):334–354

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Alaei S, Alaei R, Salimi P (2014) A game theoretical study of cooperative advertising in a single-manufacturer-two-retailers supply chain. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-5922-4

  3. Axsater S (2001) A framework for decentralized multi-echelon inventory control. IIE Trans 33(2):91–97

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baiman S, Fischer PE, Rajan MV (2000) Information, contracting and quality cost. Manag Sci 4(6):776–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Banker RD, Khosla I, Sinha KK (1998) Quality and competition. Manag Sci 44(9):1179–1192

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Cachon GP, Lariviere MA (2005) Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts: Strengths and limitations. Manag Sci 51(1):30–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Cachon GP, Zipkin PH (1999) Competitive and cooperative inventory policies in a two-stage supply chain. Manag Sci 45(7):936–953

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai GG, Chiang WC, Chen X (2011) Game theoretic pricing and ordering decisions with partial lost sales in two-stage supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 130:175–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cai GG, Zhang ZG, Zhang M (2009) Game theoretical perspectives on dual channel supply chain competition with price discounts and pricing schemes. Int J Prod Econ 117(1):80–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chambers C, Kouvelis P, Semple J (2006) Quality-based competition, profit-ability, and variable costs. Manag Sci 52(12):1884–1895

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Chao GH, Iravani SMR, Canan Savaskan R (2009) Quality improvement incentives and product recall cost sharing contracts. Manag Sci 55(7):1122–1138

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen L, Kang F (2010) Integrated inventory models considering permissible delay in payment and variant pricing strategy. Appl Math Model 34(1):36–46

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Dixit A (1979) Quality and quantity competition. Rev Econ Stud 46:587–599

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Dolgui A, Proth J (2010) Pricing strategies and models. Annu Rev Cont 34(1):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng Q, Lu LX (2012) The strategic perils of low cost outsourcing. Manag Sci 58(6):1196–1210

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Fynes B, Voss C, Burca S (2005) The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. Int J Prod Econ 96(3):339–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gans N (2002) Customer loyalty and supplier quality competition. Manag Sci 48(2):207–221

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Giovanni PD (2011) Quality improvement vs. advertising support: Which strategy works better for a manufacturer. Eur J Oper Res 208(2):119–130

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Gupta D, Weerawat W (2006) Supplier-manufacturer coordination in capacitated two-stage supply chains. Eur J Oper Res 17:67–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsieh C, Liu Y (2010) Quality investment and inspection policy in a supplier manufacturer supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 202:717–729

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Jeuland A, Shugan S (1983) Managing channel profits. Market Sci 2:239–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kohli R, Park H (1989) A cooperative game theory model of quantity discounts. Manag Sci 35(6):693–707

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Lariviere MA, Porteus EL (2001) Selling to the news vendor: an analysis of price only contracts. Manufac Service Oper Manag 3:293–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li X, Nukala S, Mohebbi S (2013) Game theory methodology for optimizing retailers’ pricing and shelf-space allocation decisions on competing substitutable products. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68:375–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin C, Chow WS, Madu CN, Kuei C, Yu P (2005) A structural equation model of supply chain quality management and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 96:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Feng J, Wei KK (2012) Negative price premium effect in online marketThe impact of competition and buyer informativeness on the pricing strategies of sellers with different reputation levels. Dec Sup Syst 54(1):681–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lu JC, Tsao YC, Charoensiriwath C (2011) Competition under manufacturer service and retail price. Econ Model 28:1256–1264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moorthy KS (1988) Product and price competition in a duopoly. Market Sci 7(2):141–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mukhopadhyay SK, Yue X, Zhu X (2011) A Stackelberg model of pricing of complementary goods under information asymmetry. Int J Prod Econ 134:424–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ren ZJ, Zhou Y (2008) Call center outsourcing: coordinating staffing level and service quality. Manag Sci 54(2):369–383

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Rong A, Akkerman R, Grunow M (2011) An optimization approach for managing fresh food quality throughout the supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):421–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Singer M, Donoso P, Traverso P (2003) Quality strategies in supply chain alliances of disposable items. Omega 31:499– 509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Slikker M, Fransoo J, Wouters M (2005) Cooperation between multiple newsvendors with trans shipments. Eur J Oper Res 167(2):370–380

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. Spence AM (1975) Monopoly, quality, and regulation. Bell J Econ 6:417–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tsao YC, Lu JC, An N, Al-Khayyal F, Lu RW, Han G (2014) Retailer shelf-space management with trade allowance: A Stackelberg game between retailer and manufacturers. Int J Prod Econ 148:133–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsay AA, Agrawal N (2000) Channel dynamics under price and service competition. Manufact Ser Oper Managet 2(4):372–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tse YK, Tan KH (2012) Managing product quality risk and visibility in multi-layer supply chain. Int J Prod Econ 139:49–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wal-mart (2009) How to become a vendor of Walmart?. http://www.walmartchina.com/

  39. Wang SD, Zhou YW, Min J, Zhong YG (2011) Coordination of cooperative advertising models in a one-manufacturer two-retailer supply chain system. Comp Ind Eng 61:1053–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Wang X, Li D (2012) A dynamic product quality evaluation based pricing model for perishable food supply chains. Omega 40:906– 917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Weng ZK (1995) Channel coordination and quantity discounts. Manag Sci 41(9):1509–1522

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Xie G, Yue W, Wang S, Lai KK (2011a) Quality investment and price decision in a risk-averse supply chain. Eur J Oper Res 214(2):403–410

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Xie G, Wang S, Lai KK (2011b) Quality improvement in competing supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 134:262–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Yang SL, Zhou YW (2005) Two-echelon supply chain models: Considering duopolistic retailers’ different competitive behaviors. Int J Prod Econ 103:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Yu Y, Chu F, Chen H (2009) A Stackelberg game and its improvement in a VMI system with a manufacturing vendor. Eur J Oper Res 192(3):929–948

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  46. Yu Y, Hong Z, Zhang LL, Liang L, Chu C (2013) Optimal selection of retailers for a manufacturing vendor in a vendor managed inventory system. Eur J Ope Res 225:274–284

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Yu Y, Huang GQ, Liang L (2009) Stackelberg game theory model for optimizing advertising, pricing and inventory policies in Vendor Managed Inventory (VMI) supply chains. Comput Ind Eng 57(1):368–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. C. Giri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Giri, B.C., Chakraborty, A. & Maiti, T. Quality and pricing decisions in a two-echelon supply chain under multi-manufacturer competition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1927–1941 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6779-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6779-2

Keywords

Navigation