Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of loads on grinding wheel binder in grinding process: insights from discontinuum-hypothesis-based grinding simulation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The load on grinding wheel (GW) binder in grinding process is an important issue in grinding studies. It affects binder behaviors, wheel-workpiece interaction, grinding force, heat and energy, machined surface quality, GW life, etc. However, few studies have systematically studied this topic and the conclusions proposed so far have been established on too many speculations and assumptions. To cover this gap, an analysis of loads on binder in grinding process is conducted based on discrete element method (DEM) and discontinuum-hypothesis-based grinding simulation. In the simulation, a discontinuous GW is modeled, experimentally calibrated, and validated. By the simulation, loads on binder are analyzed from the aspects of load history and force chain network. Load history results show that, according to the load patterns, binder can be classified into grain-binder and non-grain-binder. Grain-binder is the binder that is close to the grinding grains. This kind of binder periodically experiences the loads that contain the short and large impulse loading as well as long and small alternating loading. The former loading is produced by grinding process and called the loads in active phases while the latter is resulted from the high wheel speed and named the loads in inactive phases. Non-grain-binder is the binder that is ‘far away from’ grinding zone, and its loads are comparable and close to those of grain-binder in inactive phases, even the non-grain-binder does not adhere to a same grain. Force chain network analysis shows that, for different grinding phases and grain-workpiece contact statuses, grain-binder has rapidly-changing force chains in terms of length and scale. The directions of the force chains are always in line with grinding force directions. The findings in this study are expected to contribute to the understanding of grinding process and GW production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shaw MC (1996) Principles of abrasive processing—Oxford series on advanced manufacturing (book 13). Oxford University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Malkin S, Guo C (2008) Grinding technology: Theory and application of machining with abrasives. McGraw-Hill, USA

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ono K (1961) Analysis of the grinding force. Bull Jpn Soc Grinding Eng 1:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang D, Ge P, Bi W, Jiang J (2014) Grain trajectory and grain workpiece contact analyses for modeling of grinding force and energy partition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):2111–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hecker R, Liang S, Wu X, Xia P, Jin D (2007) Grinding force and power modeling based on chip thickness analysis. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33(5–6):449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Werner G (1978) Influence of work material on grinding forces. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 27:243–248

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li L, Fu J (1980) A study of grinding force mathematical model. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 29:245–249

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang HC, Wang JJJ (2008) A stochastic grinding force model considering random grit distribution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(12–13):1335–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Patnaik Durgumahanti US, Singh V, Venkateswara RP (2010) A new model for grinding force prediction and analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50(3):231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Saini DP, Brown RH (1980) Elastic deflections in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 29(1):189–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saini DP, Wager JG, Brown RH (1982) Practical significance of contact deflections in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 31(1):215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang LC, Suto T, Noguchi H, Waida T (1993) Applied mechanics in grinding part II: Modelling of elastic modulus of wheels and interface forces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 33(2):245–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Turchetta S (2009) Cutting force on a diamond grit in stone machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(9–10):854–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li K, Liao W (1997) Modelling of ceramic grinding processes Part I. number of cutting points and grinding forces per grit. J Mater Process Technol 65(1–3):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matsuo T, Toyoura S, Oshima E, Ohbuchi Y (1989) Effect of grain shape on cutting force in superabrasive single-grit tests. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 38(1):323–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ohbuchi Y, Matsuo T (1991) Force and chip formation in single-grit orthogonal cutting with shaped cbn and diamond grains. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 40(1):327–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Moerlein A, Marsh E, Deakyne TS, Vallance RR (2009) In-process force measurement for diameter control in precision cylindrical grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(1–2):93–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peters J, Snoeys R, Decneut A (1968) Sonic testing of grinding wheels. Proceeding of the Ninth International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference :1113–1118

  19. Brecker JN (1973) Grading grinding wheels by elastic modulus. Proc First N Am Metalwork Res Conf 3:149–156

    Google Scholar 

  20. Peklenik J, Opitz H (1962) Testing of grinding wheels. Proceeding of the Third International Machine Tool Design and Research Conference :163–181

  21. Colwell LV, Lane RO, Soderlund KN (1962) On determining the hardness of grinding wheels. J Manuf Sci Eng 84(1):113–126

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cundall PA, Strack ODL (1979) Discrete numerical model for granular assemblies. Geotechnique 29(1):47–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Specifications for the size of abrasive grain-grinding wheels (polishing and general industrial use). American National Standard ANSI B74.12-1976 (R1982)

  24. Warnecke G, Zitt U (1998) Kinematic simulation for analyzing and predicting high-performance grinding processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 47(1):265–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hou ZB, Komanduri R (2003) On the mechanics of the grinding process, Part I: stochastic nature of the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(15):1579–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu Y, Warkentin A, Bauer R, Gong Y (2013) Investigation of different grain shapes and dressing to predict surface roughness in grinding using kinematic simulations. Precis Eng 37(3):758–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Potyondy DO, Cundall PA (2004) A bonded-particle model for rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41(8):1329–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bauchau OA, Craig JI (2009) Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. Solid Mech Appl 163:173–221

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tamás K, Jóri IJ, Mouazen AM (2013) Modelling soil-sweep interaction with discrete element method. Soil Tillage Res 134:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wolff M, Salikov V, Antonyuk S, Heinrich S, Schneider G (2013) Three-dimensional discrete element modeling of micromechanical bending tests of ceramic-polymer composite materials. Powder Technol 248:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. André D, Iordanoff I, Charles JL, Néauport J (2012) Discrete element method to simulate continuous material by using the cohesive beam model. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 213–216:113–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fakhimi A, Villegas T (2007) Application of dimensional analysis in calibration of a discrete element model for rock deformation and fracture. Rock Mech Rock Eng 40(2):193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bieniawski ZT, Bernede MJ (1979) Suggested methods for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials: Part 1. Suggested method for determining deformability of rock materials in uniaxial compression. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 16(2):138–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zhou H, Chen Y, Sadek MA (2014) Modelling of soil–seed contact using the discrete element method (DEM). Biosyst Eng 121:56–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Tan Y, Yang D, Sheng Y (2009) Discrete element method (DEM) modeling of fracture and damage in the machining process of polycrystalline SiC. J Eur Ceram Soc 29(6):1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Press WH (2007) Numerical Recipes: the Art of Scientific Computing (3rd Edition). Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gadelmawla E, Koura M, Maksoud T, Elewa I, Soliman H (2002) Roughness parameters. J Mater Process Technol 123(1):133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Öpöz TT, Chen X (2012) Experimental investigation of material removal mechanism in single grit grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 63:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Bardet J (1998) Introduction to computational granular mechanics. Springer, Netherlands

    Book  Google Scholar 

  40. Malkin S, Cook NH (1971) The wear of grinding wheels Part 2: fracture wear. J Manuf Sci Eng 93(4):1129–1133

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haonan Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Yu, T., Zhu, L. et al. Analysis of loads on grinding wheel binder in grinding process: insights from discontinuum-hypothesis-based grinding simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1943–1960 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6767-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6767-6

Keywords

Navigation