Skip to main content
Log in

Quality control using a multivariate injection molding sensor

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Injection molding part quality is modeled using a multivariate sensor. Melt pressure and temperature are respectively obtained through the incorporation of a piezo-ceramic element and infrared thermopile within the sensor head. Melt velocity is derived from the transient response of the melt temperature as the polymer melt flows across the sensor’s lens. The apparent melt viscosity is then derived based on the melt velocity and the time derivative of the increasing melt pressure given the cavity thickness. Quality metrics taken into account are finished part thickness, width, length, weight, and tensile strength. A 12-run, blocked half-fractional design of experiments was performed to derive predictive models for part mass, dimensions, and structural properties. Several predictive part quality models were created using data from the machine, a suite of commercial sensors, the multivariate sensor, and combinations thereof. The results indicate that multiple orthogonal streams of process data yield higher-fidelity models with coefficients of determination approaching one. Furthermore, best subset analysis indicates that the most important process data are gathered from in-mold sensors, where the acquired information is closest to the states of the polymer forming the final product.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SPI (2012) Size and impact of the plastics industry on the U.S. economy, ed: Society of the Plastics Industry

  2. Chen Z, Turng LS (2005) A review of current developments in process and quality control for injection molding. Adv Polym Technol 24:165–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mann JW (1974) Process parameter control: the key to optimization. Plast Eng 30:25–27

    Google Scholar 

  4. Coates PD, Speight RG (1995) Towards intelligent process control of injection moulding of polymers. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 209:357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dubay R, Bell AC, Gupta YP (1997) Control of plastic melt temperature: a multiple input multiple output model predictive approach. Polym Eng Sci 37:1550–1563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanner I (2000) Engineering rheology

  7. Malkin AY, Isayev AI (2005) Rheology: concepts, methods, and applications: ChemTec Publishing

  8. Diduch C, Dubay R, Li WG (2004) Temperature control of injection molding. Part I: modeling and identification. Polym Eng Sci 44:2308–2317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kurt M, Kaynak Y, Kamber OS, Mutlu B, Bakir B, Koklu U (2010) Influence of molding conditions on the shrinkage and roundness of injection molded parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:571–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassan H (2013) An experimental work on the effect of injection molding parameters on the cavity pressure and product weight. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:675–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokoi H, Murata Y, Tsukakoshi H (1992) Measurement of melt temperature profiles during filling and packing processes using a new integrated thermocouple sensor. ANTEC 92–Shap Futur 2:1875–1881

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kazmer DO, Johnston SP, Gao RX, Fan Z (2011) Feasibility analysis of an in-mold multivariate sensor. Int Polym Process 26:63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Yang Y, Gao F (2006) Injection molding product weight: online prediction and control based on a nonlinear principal component regression model. Polym Eng Sci 46:540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Min B (2003) A study on quality monitoring of injection-molded parts. J Mater Process Technol 136:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richalet J (1993) Industrial applications of model based predictive control. Automatica 29:1251–1274

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Kazmer DO, Westerdale S (2009) A model-based methodology for on-line quality control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bicerano J (2002) Prediction of polymer properties: CRC Press, Boca Raton, IL

  18. Wang Y, Xiao Y, Zhang Q, Gao XL, Fu Q (2003) The morphology and mechanical properties of dynamic packing injection molded PP/PS blends. Polymer 44:1469–1480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kazmer D, Westerdale S, Hazen D (2008) A comparison of statistical process control (SPC) and on-line multivariate analyses (MVA) for injection molding. Int Polym Process 23:447–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fisches MK, Kazmer DO, Gordon GW (2003) Verification of rheological mixing rules to the application of masterbatches, presented at the Society of Plastics Engineers (SPE) ANTEC, Cincinnati, OH

  21. Eastment H, Krzanowski W (1982) Cross-validatory choice of the number of components from a principal component analysis. Technometrics 24:73–77

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Efron B, Gong G (1983) A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. Am Stat 37:36–48

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Yokoi H, Masuda N, Mitsuhata H (2002) Visualization analysis of flow front behavior during filling process of injection mold cavity by two-axis tracking system. J Mater Process Technol 130:328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gamberini R, Regattieri A (2008) Double pressing for porcelain stoneware tiles: an exploratory analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 108:1081–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guthrie Gordon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gordon, G., Kazmer, D.O., Tang, X. et al. Quality control using a multivariate injection molding sensor. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1381–1391 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6706-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6706-6

Keywords

Navigation