Advertisement

Towards the establishment of weldability test standards for hydrogen-assisted cold cracking

  • R. Kurji
  • N. ConiglioEmail author
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Industry and research have long desired the establishment of standards for weldability testing in regards to hydrogen-assisted cold cracking formation. This would have the obvious advantage of allowing data to be reliably compared between different research labs. But making decisions regarding standards requires some careful thought and agreement on i) how test parameters affect test results, ii) what exactly needs to be measured, and iii) how test results should be interpreted and reported. Our depth of understanding on these points has matured significantly over time and, while there is not always universal agreement, it is at least possible to start highlighting factors important to standards. This paper examines these factors, including the welding parameters, restraint, hydrogen, and cracking index. When comparing different alloys having different thermal characteristics, the use of constant welding parameters (common practice) will result in variable weld penetration and weld pool shape, which can influence grain shape and microstructural features, which can result in inequitable weldability comparisons. Welding on test coupons having different dimensions can affect restraint, which will influence the residual stresses around the weldment. High restraint usually results in higher crack susceptibility. Also, hydrogen content present in a weldment depends on the thermal history, welding parameters, and surrounding atmosphere humidity, with high hydrogen contents associated to great cracking susceptibility. Finally, the selection of an appropriate cracking index is required for data analysis. Quantifications of crack length and minimum preheat temperature are common indexes used for comparison. Critical stress and hydrogen content are other indexes. But how well these indexes actually represent weldability are contentious issues. This paper will examine and quantify these issues in detail, thus providing the reader with an appreciation of all things that must be considered when preparing a standardized procedure for weldability testing.

Keywords

Weldability tests Restraint Stress Welding parameters Hydrogen-assisted cold cracking 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Graville B (1986) A survey review of weld metal hydrogen cracking. Weld World 24(9/10):190–198Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    B.A. Graville (1995) Interpretive report on weldability tests for hydrogen cracking of higher strength steels and their potential for standardization. WRC Bull 400Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yurioka N, Suzuki H (1990) Hydrogen assisted cracking in c-mn and low alloy steel weldments. Int Mater Rev 35(4):217–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Glover A and Rothwell B (1999) Specifications and practices for hydrogen crack avoidance in pipeline girth welds, In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 13.1-13.18. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannengiesser T, Boellinghaus T (2013) Cold cracking tests—an overview of present technologies and applications. Weld World 57:3–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    North TH, Rothwell AB, Glover AG, and Pick RJ (1982) Weldability of high strength line pipe steels. Weld J, August, 243s-257sGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coniglio N, Linton V, Gamboa E (2010) Coating composition, weld parameter, and consumable conditioning effects on weld metal composition in shielded metal arc welding. Sci Technol Weld Join 15(5):361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Natalie CA, Olson DL, Blander M (1986) Physical and chemical behavior of welding fluxes. Annu Rev Mater Sci 16:389–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Coniglio N, Barbaro F, Linton VM, Gamboa E, and Kurji R (2010) Hydrogen assisted cold cracking susceptibility of weld metal deposited by cellulosic shielded metal arc welding consumables. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference, IPC2010, Calgary, Canada. IPC2010-31680Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hart P (1986) Effects of steel inclusions and residual elements on weldability. Met Constr, October, 610–616Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Talas S (2010) The assessment of carbon-equivalent formulas in predicting the properties of steel weld metals. Mater Des 31(5):2649–2653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yurioka N, Kasuya T (1995) A chart method to determine necessary preheat in steel welding. Weld World 35(5):327–334Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dearden J, O’Neil H (1940) A guide to the selection and welding of low alloy structural steels. Trans Int Weld 3(10):203–214Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Suzuki H, Tamura H (1961) Weldability of high strength steels evaluated by synthetic HAZ ductility test. Rep NRIM 3(1):47–59Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hannerz NE (1980) The influence of silicon on the weldability of mild and high tensile structural steel, IIW Doc. IX-1169-80Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Uwer D and Hohne H (1991) Determination of suitable minimum preheating temperatures for the cold-crack-free welding of steels, IIW Doc. IX-1631-9Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Itoh Y, Bessho K (1968) Cracking parameter of high strength steels related to HAZ cracking. J Jpn Weld Soc 37(9):983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Duren C (1985) Equations for the prediction of cold cracking in field-welding large diameter pipes, IIW Doc. IX-1356-85Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Graville BA Cold cracking in welds in HSLA steels, Proc. Conf. on Weldability of HSLA Structural Steel, Rome, ASMGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yurioka N, Ohshita S, Tamehiro H (1981) Study on carbon equivalents to assess cold cracking tendency in steel welding. AWRA Symposium on Pipeline Welding in the 80’s, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lazor RB and Graville BA (1983) Effect of microalloying on weld cracking in low carbon steels. Can Welder and Fabricator, July, 21–23Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kasuya T, Yurioka N (1995) Determination of necessary preheat temperature to avoid cold cracking under varying ambient temperature. ISIJ Int 35(10):1183–1189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kou S (2002) Welding metallurgy, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alam N, Dunne D, and Barbaro F (1999) Weld metal crack testing for high strength cellulosic electrodes. In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 9.1-9.23. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Signes EG, Howe P (1988) Hydrogen-assisted cracking in high-strength pipeline steels. Weld J 67(8):163s–170sGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kurji R, Griggs J, Linton V, Kotousov A, Gamboa E, Ghomashchi R, and Coniglio N (2013) An improved welding Institute of Canada test for evaluation of high strength pipeline steel weldability. In: Proc. 6th Pipeline Technology Conference, OstendGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Magudeeswaran G, Balasubramanian V, Madhusudhan Reddy G (2008) Hydrogen induced cold cracking studies on armour grade high strength, quenched, and tempered steel weldments. Int J Hydrog Energy 33:1897–1908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sawhill JM Jr, Dix AW, Savage WF (1974) Modified implant test for studying delayed cracking. Weld J 53(13):554s–560sGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Vasudevan R, Stout RD and Pense AW (1981) Hydrogen-assisted cracking in HSLA pipeline steels, Weld J, Sept, 155s-168sGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Beachem CD (1972) A new model for hydrogen-assisted cracking (Hydrogen “Embrittlement”). Metall Trans 3:437–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Law M, Nolan D, Holdstock R (2008) Method for the quantitative assessment of transverse weld metal hydrogen cracking. Mater Charact 59:991–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Peterneder E and Königshofer H (1999) Capabilities and limitations of cellulosic electrodes—a producer’s perspective. In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 17.1-17.17. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sarrafan S, Ghaini FM and Rahimi E (2010) Weld metal hydrogen cracking in transmission pipelines construction, In: Proceedings of the 8th International Pipeline Conference IPC2010, Calgary, Canada. IPC2010-31240Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alam N, Dunne D, Squires I, Barbaro F and Feng B (1996) Weldment cold cracking—the effect of hydrogen and other factors, In: Proceedings of Joint Seminar Hydrogen Management in Steel Weldments, Melbourne, Australia, 49–60. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kinsey AJ. The welding of structural steels without preheat, Weld J, 79 (4), 79s-88sGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Graville BA, McParlan M (1974) Weld-metal cold cracking. Met Constr Br Weld J 6(2):62–63Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sterjovski Z, Pitrun M, Nolan D, Dunne D, Norrish J (2007) Artificial neural networks for predicting diffusible hydrogen content and cracking susceptibility in rutile flux-cored arc welds. J Mater Process Technol 184:420–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McParlan M, Graville BA (1976) Hydrogen cracking in weld metals. Weld J 55(4):95s–102sGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Vasudevan R, Stout RD, Pense AW (1980) A field weldability test for pipeline steels—part I. Weld J 59(3):76s–84sGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Suzuki H, Yurioka N, Okumura M (1983) A new cracking parameter for welded steels considering local accumulation of hydrogen. Weld World 21(5/6):110–132, Doc. IIS/IIW-755-83Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ushio M, Sugitani Y, Kanayama K, Aida I, Hara N and Nakano T (1999) Cracking in GMAW pipeline girth welds based on experiences in pipeline construction in Japan, in: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 10.1-10.19. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Katz Y, Tymiak N, Gerberich WW (2001) Nanomechanical probes as new approaches to hydrogen/deformation interaction studies. Eng Fract Mech 68(6):619–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Costin WL, Lavigne O, Linton V, Brown IH, Kotousov AG, Barbaro FJ and Ghomashchi R (2013) Micromechanical examination of the relationship between weld metal microstructure and hydrogen assisted cold cracking, In: Proc. 6th Pipeline Technology Conference, OstendGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bailey N (1994) Weldability of ferritic steels. Abington PublishingGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lippold JC (2005) Recent developments in weldability testing. In: Hot cracking phenomena in welds, Springer: 271–290Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Cross CE, Boellinghaus T (2006) The effect of restraint on weld solidification cracking in aluminium. Weld World 50:51–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Yurioka N (1999) Predictive methods for prevention and control of hydrogen assisted cold cracking, In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 2.1-2.16. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Barbaro FJ (1999) Types of hydrogen cracking in pipeline girth welds, In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 11.1-11.15. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hirth JP (1980) Effect of hydrogen on the properties of iron and steel. Metall Trans 11A:861–890CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Padhy GK, Komizo Y (2013) Diffusible hydrogen in steel weldments. Trans JWRI 42:39–62Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fletcher L, Yurioka N (2000) A holistic model of hydrogen cracking in pipeline girth welding. Weld World 44(2):29–36Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Fletcher L and Yurioka N (1999) A holistic model of hydrogen cracking in pipeline girth welding, In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 12.1-12.14. WTIAGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    A. Glover and B. Graville (1999) The risk of hydrogen cracking in multipass welds and its effect upon procedure design, In: First International Conference on Weld Metal Hydrogen Cracking in Pipeline Girth Welds, Wollongong, Australia, 9.1-9.23. WTIAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringThe University of AdelaideAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.MSMP LaboratoryArts et Metiers ParisTechAix en ProvenceFrance

Personalised recommendations