Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation of laser tracker kinematic models and parameter identification

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new kinematic model for a laser tracker is presented in this paper. This model obtains the kinematic parameters by the coordinate transformation matrices between successive reference systems based on the Denavit-Hartenberg method. The ASME B89.4.19 Standard provides some ranging tests, length measurement system tests and two-face system tests that can be performed to analyze the performance of the laser tracker. However, these tests take a lot of time and require specialized equipment. Another problem is that the end user cannot apply the manufacturer’s model because he cannot measure physical errors. The kinematic model developed has been compared with a geometric model based on modelling physical errors. To do this, the laser tracker kinematic model has been presented and validated using a mesh with synthetic reflector coordinates and known error parameters. The laser tracker has then been calibrated, in an easy and fast way, with experimental data using the measurements obtained by a coordinate measuring machine as nominal values. The calibration has been performed with both the kinematic model presented in this work and the geometric model based on physical errors. A comparison of both calibrations has been made, analyzing the performance of both models. Finally, a sensitivity analysis of the length measurement system tests is presented to recommend the more suitable positions to perform the calibration procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gu Y, Hu J, Jin Y, Zhai C (2012) A smart car for the surface shape measurement of large antenna based on Laser Tracker: 84505P-84505P-6

  2. Cuypers W, Van Gestel N, Voet A, Kruth J, Mingneau J, Bleys P (2009) Optical measurement techniques for mobile and large-scale dimensional metrology. Opt Lasers Eng 47:292–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu WL, Wang ZK (2010) New method for large-scale dimensional metrology using laser tracker system. Adv Mater Res 97:4247–4250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ouyang J, Liang Z, Zhang H, Yan Y (2006) Research of measuring accuracy of laser tracker system: 62800T-62800T-6

  5. Yan B, Wang J, Lu N, Deng W, Dong M, Lou X (2008) Application of laser tracker used in the measuring and the adjusting of the workbench for SAR antenna: 71552M-71552M-8

  6. Gordon L (2011) Portable laser tracker measures large volumes accurately. Mach Des 83:55–55

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barazzetti L, Giussani A, Roncoroni F, Previtali M (2013) Monitoring structure movement with laser tracking technology: 879106-879106-12

  8. Sładek J, Ostrowska K, Kohut P, Holak K, Gąska A, Uhl T (2012) Development of a vision based deflection measurement system and its accuracy assessment. Measurement

  9. Santolaria J, Conte J, Ginés M (2013) Laser tracker-based kinematic parameter calibration of industrial robots by improved CPA method and active retroreflector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66:2087–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nubiola A, Bonev IA (2012) Absolute calibration of an ABB IRB 1600 robot using a laser tracker. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 29(1):236–245. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2012.06.004

  11. Zhu W, Mei B, Ke Y (2014) Kinematic modeling and parameter identification of a new circumferential drilling machine for aircraft assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72(5–8):1143–1158

  12. Wang Z, Maropolous PG (2013) Real-time error compensation of a three-axis machine tool using a laser tracker. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:919–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Meng G, Tiemin L, Wensheng Y (2003) Calibration method and experiment of Stewart platform using a laser tracker 3:2797–2802

  14. Koseki Y, Arai T, Sugimoto K, Takatuji T, Goto M (1998) Design and accuracy evaluation of high-speed and high precision parallel mechanism, vol 2. IEEE, Leuven, p 1340–1345

  15. Santolaria J, Majarena AC, Samper D, Brau A, Velázquez J (2014) Articulated arm coordinate measuring machine calibration by laser tracker multilateration. Sci World J 2014:681853-1–681853-11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muralikrishnan B, Lee V, Blackburn C, Sawyer D, Phillips S, Ren W, Hughes B (2013) Assessing ranging errors as a function of azimuth in laser trackers and tracers. Meas Sci Technol 24:065201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. ASME B89.4.19-2006 Standard. Performance evaluation of laser-based spherical coordinate measurement systems www.asme.org

  18. Muralikrishnan B, Sawyer D, Blackburn C, Phillips S, Borchardt B, Estler W (2009) ASME B89. 4.19 performance evaluation tests and geometric misalignments in laser trackers. J Res Ntnl Inst Stand Technol 114:21–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Loser R, Kyle S (1999) Alignment and field check procedures for the Leica Laser Tracker LTD 500:1–14

  20. Denavit J, Hartenberg RS (1955) A kinematic notation for lower-pair mechanisms based on matrices. Trans ASME J Appl Mech 22:215–221

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wanli L, Xinghua Q, Yonggang Y (2007) Calibration and error compensation of portable coordinate measuring arm. Chin J Sci Inst: S1

  22. Santolaria J, Aguilar J, Yaguee J, Pastor J (2008) Kinematic parameter estimation technique for calibration and repeatability improvement of articulated arm coordinate measuring machines. Precis Eng-J Int Soc Precis Eng Nanotechnol 32:251–268

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nubiola A, Bonev IA (2014) Absolute robot calibration with a single telescoping ballbar. Precis Eng 38:472–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Robson S, Ahmadabadian A, Sargeant B, Erfani T, Boehm J (2013) A webcam photogrammetric method for robot calibration

  25. Majarena AC, Santolaria J, Samper D, Aguilar JJ (2011) Modelling and calibration of parallel mechanisms using linear optical sensors and a coordinate measuring machine. Meas Sci Technol 22:105101-1-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang D, Gosselin CM (2002) Kinetostatic analysis and design optimization of the tricept machine tool family. J Manuf Sci Eng 124:725–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Takatsuji T, Goto M, Kirita A, Kurosawa T, Tanimura Y (2000) The relationship between the measurement error and the arrangement of laser trackers in laser trilateration. Meas Sci Technol 11:477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhuang H, Motaghedi SH, Roth ZS, Bai Y (2003) Calibration of multi-beam laser tracking systems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 19:301–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aguado S, Santolaria J, Samper D, Aguilar JJ (2013) Study of self-calibration and multilateration in machine tool volumetric verification for laser tracker error reduction. Proc Inst Mech Eng Pt B: J Eng Manuf: 0954405413511074

  30. Hughes B, Forbes A, Lewis A, Sun W, Veal D, Nasr K (2011) Laser tracker error determination using a network measurement. Meas Sci Technol 22:045103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Slocum AH (1992) Precision machine design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Design and Manufacturing Engineering, Universidad de Zaragoza, María de Luna, 3, 50018, Zaragoza, Spain

    J. Conte, A. C. Majarena, J. Santolaria & J. J. Aguilar

  2. Centro Universitario de la Defensa Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain

    R. Acero

Authors
  1. J. Conte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. C. Majarena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Acero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. J. Santolaria
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. J. Aguilar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. C. Majarena.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Conte, J., Majarena, A.C., Acero, R. et al. Performance evaluation of laser tracker kinematic models and parameter identification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77, 1353–1364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6551-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6551-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation