Advertisement

Development of a new method to automatic nesting and piloting system design for progressive die

  • M. J. MoghaddamEmail author
  • M. A. Farsi
  • M. Anoushe
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Over the last few decades, sheet metal parts have had a number of applications in the industry. The most important and most used type of the dies to production these parts is progressive dies. Computer-aided design of these dies consists of a considerable number of sections. The two most important types of these sections are nesting and piloting. Finding the best nesting plays an important role in the final cost of production and for an accurate strip positioning, the appropriate piloting system is required. In this paper, a new method for curve recognition by dividing part’s element into component points is presented for finding the best nesting and piloting state. Curve recognition data and the algorithms for finding the best nesting and piloting system were obtained just by using algebraic equations. This method leads to a decrease in the time of design. The best nesting for all parts that includes line and circular arc will be obtained with the high precision. The semi-direct and indirect pilot hole centers and its diameter will be obtained by defining four matrixes. This system is written in visual basic programming language in the SOLIDWORKS 2010 software. Finally, to compare the system’s results to similar system, the nesting and piloting systems for the number of samples are analyzed.

Keywords

Computer-aided design Progressive die Nesting Curve recognition Piloting 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schaffer G (1971) Computer design of progressive dies. Am Mach 22:73–75Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fogg B, Jaimeson B (1975) The influencing factors in optimizing press tool die layouts and a solution using computer aids. CIRP Ann 24:429–434Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shibata Y, Kunitomo Y (1981) Sheet metal CAD/CAM [computer-aided-design/computer-aided-manufacture] system. Bull Jpn Soc Precis Eng 15:219–224Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nakahara S, Kojima T, Tamura S, Funimo A, Choichiro S and Mukumuru T (1978) Computer progressive die design. Proceedings of 19th MTDR conference 171–6Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Choi J, Kim B, Cho H, Kim C, Kim J (1997) An automated die design system for blanking or piercing of stator and rotor parts. J Korean Soc Precis Eng 1:22–23Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Choi JC, Kim BM, Cho HY, Kim C (1998) A compact and practical CAD system for blanking or piercing of irregular-shaped sheet metal products and stator and rotor parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38:931–963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Choi CJ, Kim MB, Cho YH, Kim C, Kim HJ (1998) An integrated CAD system for the blanking of irregular-shaped sheet metal products. J Mater Process Technol 83:84–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi J, Kim B, Kim C, Kim J (1997) An automated process planning system for blanking and piercing of stator and rotor parts and irregular shaped sheet metal products. J Korean Soc Precis Eng 1:46–53Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Choi J, Kim C, Yoon J (2000) An automated CAD system for progressive working of irregular shaped metal products and lead frame for semiconductors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:624–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nye T (2001) Optimal nesting of irregular convex blanks in strips via an exact algorithm. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:991–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barzegari M, Arezoo B (1998) Computer aided progressive die design, fourth production and manufacturing engineering conference. Amirkabir University of Technology, TehranGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee S-B, Kim D-H, Kim B-M (2002) Development of optimal layout design system in multihole blanking process. J Mater Process Technol 130:2–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghatrehnaby M, Arezoo B (2009) A fully automated nesting and piloting system for progressive dies. J Mater Process Technol 209:525–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ghatrehnaby M, Arezoo B (2010) Automatic piloting in progressive dies using medial axis transform. Appl Math Model 34:2981–2997CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kim J, Kim C, Chang Y (2006) Development of a process sequence determination technique by fuzzy set theory for an electric product with piercing and bending operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 31:450–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Farsi M, Arezoo B (2009) Development of a new method to determine bending sequence in progressive dies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:52–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giannakakis T, Vosniakos G (2008) Sheet metal cutting and piercing operations planning and tools configuration by an expert system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:658–670CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moghaddam M, Soleymani M and Farsi M (2013) Sequence planning for stamping operations in progressive dies. J Intell Manuf 1–11Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jia Z-X, Li H-L, Zhang X-C, Li J-Q, Chen B-J (2011) Computer-aided structural design of punches and dies for progressive die based on functional component. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:837–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Iran University of Industries and MinesTehranIran
  2. 2.Aerospace Research InstituteTehranIran
  3. 3.Amirkabir University of TechnologyTehranIran

Personalised recommendations