Skip to main content
Log in

A parallel-based path generation method for fused deposition modeling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper proposes an approach to parallel filling path generation based on adaptive gaps for fused deposition modeling (FDM) with full consideration of technology characteristics of this promising fabricating method. At first, analysis on the similarities and differences between FDM and the conventional milling manufacturing is conducted from the tool-path planning perspective. Meanwhile, some specific features of FDM are analyzed in detail to point out three critical issues in the path planning process which is correlated with the fabricating quality and modeling accuracy. These issues are described specifically by means of theoretical analysis and practical fabrication: large number of uncut paths, sharp corners in the filling path, and overfill and underfill phenomena which are out of the constant gap between parallel paths. The proposed tool-path generation method determines the inclination of the reference line based on less number of sharp corners in the paths firstly. Then, the filling area is divided with three stages. The pre-sweeping stage employs a group of paralleling lines with pre-determined gaps and optimized inclination to intersect the filling boundaries and stores the intersections between them, the second stage adjusts some sweeping line segments which satisfy several specific conditions, and the last stage divides the filling areas into several sub-regions according to the selected sweeping lines. Subsequently, the sweeping lines within each sub-region are adjusted adaptively to uniform gaps individually. At last, some adjacent sub-paths that can be connected to decrease the number of uncut paths are linked. Relative performance evaluation and experimental analyses are provided to demonstrate that the proposed methods can enhance the fabricating quality significantly with some improvements in the machining efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dima MG, FarisatoM, BergomiV, Viotto D, Magrin D, Greggio J, Farinato L, Marafatto R, Ragazzoni D (2014) Piazza. From 3D view to 3D print. in SPIE Astronomical Telescopes + InstrumentationInternational Society for Optics and Photonics

  2. Jin G, Li WD, Gao L, Popplewell K (2013) A hybrid and adaptive tool-path generation approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing for biomedical models. Comput Ind 64(3):336–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paul R, Anand S (2011) Optimal part orientation in rapid manufacturing process for achieving geometric tolerances. J Manuf Syst 30(4):214–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kulkarni P, Marsan A, Dutta D (2000) A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 6(1):18–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Strano GL, Hao R, Everson, Evans K (2013) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande SG (2003) Slicing procedures in layered manufacturing: a review. Rapid Prototyp J 9(5):274–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandey PM, Reddy NV, Dhande S (2003) Real time adaptive slicing for fused deposition modelling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(1):61–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C-S, Chang T-R (2008) Re-triangulation in STL meshes for rapid prototyping and manufacture. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(7–8):770–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Qi HM, Azer, Singh P (2010) Adaptive toolpath deposition method for laser net shape manufacturing and repair of turbine compressor airfoils. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48(1–4):121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cerit E, Lazoglu I (2011) A CAM-based path generation method for rapid prototyping applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56(1–4):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim BH, Choi BK (2002) Machining efficiency comparison direction-parallel tool path with contour-parallel tool path. Comput Aided Des 34(2):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Han WB, Danforth SC, Safari A, Jafari MA (2002) Tool path-based deposition planning in fused deposition processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(2):462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Held M (1991) A geometry-based investigation of the tool path generation for zigzag pocket machining. Vis Comput 7(5–6):296–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Park SC, Choi BK (2000) Tool-path planning for direction-parallel area milling. Comput Aided Des 32(1):17–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim H-C (2010) Optimum tool path generation for 2.5 D direction-parallel milling with incomplete mesh model. J Mech Sci Technol 24(5):1019–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Toh C (2004) A study of the effects of cutter path strategies and orientations in milling. J Mater Process Technol 152(3):346–356

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Persson H (1978) NC machining of arbitrarily shaped pockets. Comput Aided Des 10(3):169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Held M, Lukács G, Andor L (1994) Pocket machining based on contour-parallel tool paths generated by means of proximity maps. Comput Aided Des 26(3):189–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lin Z, Fu J, He Y, Gan W (2013) A robust 2D point-sequence curve offset algorithm with multiple islands for contour-parallel tool path. Comput Aided Des 45(3):657–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jin G, Li W, Gao L (2013) An adaptive process planning approach of rapid prototyping and manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 29(1):23–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Wah PK, Murty KG, Joneja A, Chiu LC (2002) Tool path optimization in layered manufacturing. IIE Trans 34(4):335–347

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yang YH, Loh HT, Fuh FYH, Wang YG (2002) Equidistant path generation for improving scanning efficiency in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyp J 8(1):30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yang JH, Bin X, Zhang, Liu Z (2003) Fractal scanning path generation and control system for selective laser sintering (SLS). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(3):293–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiaomao H, Chunsheng Y, Yongjun H (2011) Tool path planning based on endpoint build-in optimization in rapid prototyping. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science: 0954406211411643

  25. Ding D, Pan ZS, Cuiuri D et al (2014) A tool-path generation strategy for wire and arc additive manufacturing[J]. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73(1–4):173–183.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong He.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jin, Ya., He, Y., Xue, Gh. et al. A parallel-based path generation method for fused deposition modeling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 77, 927–937 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6530-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6530-z

Keywords

Navigation