Advertisement

Comparison of injection molding process windows for plastic lens established by artificial neural network and response surface methodology

  • Kuo-Ming TsaiEmail author
  • Hao-Jhih Luo
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

This study used artificial neural network (ANN) and response surface methodology (RSM) to obtain the lens form accuracy prediction model. Moreover, it established the operating parameter region that satisfies the designated lens form accuracy at a minimum cost. Finally, experimental verification and accuracy comparison were conducted. This study used the Taguchi method for parameter screening experiment in the injection molding process. The obtained significant factors that influence form accuracy of the lens were mold temperature, cooling time, and packing time. Those significant factors were used for full factorial experiment, for adjusted experiment using composite central design method, and to establish the process window. According to the results, the process window for injection molding using an ANN to establish cooling time and packing time was a high-order, irregular shape, whereas the one established by a RSM was oblique oval. The optimal form accuracy of the lens obtained from ANN model was better than that from RSM model. The result of the experiment indicated that the process window of the injection molding process for optimal form accuracy obtained from both ANN and RSM models is quite consistent. In addition, a case study for a form accuracy of 0.5 μm was discussed. The process window established by ANN had a better accuracy and wider range than that by RSM.

Keywords

Process window Injection molding Optical lens Artificial neural network (ANN) Response surface methodology (RSM) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kurt M, Kaynak Y, Kamber OS, Mutlu B, Bakir B, Koklu U (2010) Influence of molding conditions on the shrinkage and roundness of injection molded parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:571–578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Park K (2004) A study on flow simulation and deformation analysis for injection-molded plastic parts using three-dimensional solid element. Polym Plast Technol Eng 43:1569–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li H, Guo Z, Li D (2007) Reducing the effects of weldlines on appearance of plastic products by Taguchi experimental method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:927–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Taguchi G, Chowdhury S, Wu Y (2005) Taguchi’s quality engineering handbook. John Wiley Sons, HobokenzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Peace GS (1993) Taguchi methods. Addison-Wesley, TaipeiGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang C, Hung SW (2004) Optimizing the thermoforming process of polymeric foams: an approach by using the Taguchi method and the utility concept. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:353–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shiou FJ, Chen CCA, Li WT (2006) Automated surface finishing of plastic injection mold steel with spherical grinding and ball burnishing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:61–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahapatra SS, Patnaik A (2007) Optimization of wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM) process parameters using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:911–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tang SH, Tan YJ, Sapuan SM, Sulaiman S, Ismail N, Samin R (2007) The use of Taguchi method in the design of plastic injection mould for reducing warpage. J Mater Proc Technol 182:418–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Tsai KM (2010) Effect of injection molding process parameters on optical properties of lenses. Appl Opt 49:6149–6159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Altan M (2010) Reducing shrinkage in injection moldings via the Taguchi, ANOVA and neural network methods. Mater Des 31:599–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chiang YC, Cheng HC, Huang CF, Lee JL, Lin Y, Shen YK (2011) Warpage phenomenon of thin-wall injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55:517–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Öktem H (2012) Optimum process conditions on shrinkage of an injected-molded part of DVD-ROM cover using Taguchi robust method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61:519–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Modrak V, Mandulak J, Marton D (2013) Investigation of the influence of technological parameters on surface color of plastic parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:1757–1764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sadeghi BHM (2000) A BP-neural network predictor model for plastic injection molding process. J Mater Proc Technol 103:411–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kwak TS, Suzuki T, Bae WB, Uehara Y, Ohmori H (2005) Application of neural network and computer simulation to improve surface profile of injection molding optic lens. J Mater Proc Technol 170:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lee KS, Lin JC (2006) Design of the runner and gating system parameters for a multi-cavity injection mould using FEM and neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:1089–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Yen C, Lin JC, Li W, Huang MF (2006) An abductive neural network approach to the design of runner dimensions for the minimization of warpage in injection mouldings. J Mater Proc Technol 174:22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shie JR (2008) Optimization of injection molding process for contour distortions of polypropylene composite components by a radial basis neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:1091–1103CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen WC, Wang MW, Chen CT, Fu GL (2009) An integrated parameter optimization system for MISO plastic injection molding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:501–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chen CC, Su PL, Lin YC (2009) Analysis and modeling of effective parameters for dimension shrinkage variation of injection molded part with thin shell feature using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:1087–1095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yin F, Mao H, Hua L (2011) A hybrid of back propagation neural network and genetic algorithm for optimization of injection molding process parameters. Mater Des 32:3457–3464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Huang CN, Chang CC (2011) Optimal-parameter determination by inverse model based on MANFIS: the case of injection molding for PBGA. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 19:1596–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Tzeng CJ, Yang YK, Lin YH, Tsai CH (2012) A study of optimization of injection molding process parameters for SGF and PTFE reinforced PC composites using neural network and response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63:691–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Myers RH, Montgomery DC (2002) Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bas D, Boyaci IH (2007) Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J Food Eng 78:836–845CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lizotte DJ, Greiner R, Schuurmans D (2012) An experimental methodology for response surface optimization methods. J Glob Optim 53:699–736CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chiang KT, Chang FP (2007) Analysis of shrinkage and warpage in an injection-molded part with a thin shell feature using the response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:468–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wang G, Zhao G, Li H, Guan Y (2011) Research on optimization design of the heating/cooling channels for rapid heat cycle molding based on response surface methodology and constrained particle swarm optimization. Expert Syst Appl 38:6705–6719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wua L, Yick KL, Ng SP, Yip J, Kong KH (2012) Parametric design and process parameter optimization for bra cup molding via response surface methodology. Expert Syst Appl 39:162–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kurtaran H, Erzurumlu T (2006) Efficient warpage optimization of thin shell plastics parts using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27:468–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Brient A, Brissot M, Rouxel T, Sangleboeuf JC (2011) Influence of grinding parameters on glass workpieces surface finish using response surface methodology. J Manuf Sci Eng 133, doi: 10.1115/1.4004317
  34. 34.
    Pradhan MK (2013) Estimating the effect of process parameters on surface integrity of EDMed AISI D2 tool steel by response surface methodology coupled with grey relational analysis. J Adv Manuf Technol 67:2051–2062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsai KM, Tang BH (2014) Determination of injection molding process window based on form accuracy of lens using response surface methodology. J Adv Manuf Technol 75:947–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Chin-Yi University of TechnologyTaichungRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations