Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Framework to evaluate manufacturing capability using analytical hierarchy process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Manufacturing capability of a firm is given by the level of output generated by the production system employed which in turn decides the competitiveness in the market. The pattern of structural and infrastructural decisions in the manufacturing affects the capability of the production system. Therefore, it is crucial to know the overall manufacturing capability of a firm and the contribution of each decision in it. This paper presents quantification of manufacturing capability based on multi-criteria approach. A total of 33 decisions (criteria) and their corresponding choices have been identified from the literature analysis to quantify the manufacturing capability. These decisions are then classified into six decision areas (group criteria), and the manufacturing capability evaluation problem is modeled by using analytical hierarchy process (AHP) framework. The approach facilitates computation of manufacturing capability index by evaluating the decisions taken in the manufacturing, which is then mapped into four levels, namely, infant, industry average, adult, and world class as proposed by the Miltenburg. The methodology is illustrated with a numerical example for a job shop manufacturing system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1979) Link manufacturing process and product life cycles. Harv Bus Rev 57(1):133–140

    Google Scholar 

  2. Miltenburg J (2005) Manufacturing strategy—how to formulate and implement a winning plan, 2nd edn. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Haas, E. A., (1987) Breakthrough manufacturing. Harv Bus Rev 75–81

  4. Choudhari SC, Adil GK, Usha A (2012) Choices in manufacturing strategy decision areas in batch production system—six case studies. Int J Prod Res 50(14):3698–3717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Choudhari SC, Adil GK, Usha A (2012) Exploratory case studies on manufacturing decision areas in the job shop productions system. Int J Oper Prod Manag 32(11):1337–1361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Roy M, Platts KW (1997) Manufacturing vision and competitiveness. Integr Manuf Syst 8(5):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wheelwright, S. C. and Hayes, R. H., (1985). Competing through manufacturing. Harv Bus Rev 99–109

  8. Vinod S, Balaji SR (2011) Fuzzy logic based leanness assessment and its decision support system. Int J Prod Res 49(13):4027–4041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vinod S, Devadasan SR, Vasudeva Reddy B, Kusuma R (2010) Agility index measurement using multi-grade fuzzy approach integrated in a 20 criteria agile model. Int J Prod Res 48(23):7159–7176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hallgren M, Olhager J (2006) Quantification of manufacturing strategy: a methodology and illustration. Int J Prod Econ 104:113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Skinner W (1969) Manufacturing—missing link in corporate strategy. Harv Bus Rev 47(3):136–145

    Google Scholar 

  12. Skinner W (1974) The focused factory. Harv Bus Rev 54(3):113–119

    Google Scholar 

  13. Santos FCA (2000) Integration of human resource management and competitive priorities of manufacturing strategy. Int J Oper Prod Manag 20(5):610–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes RH, Wheelwright SC (1984) Restoring our competitive edge: competing through manufacturing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hill A, Hill T (2009) Manufacturing operations strategy. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dangayach GS, Deshmukh SG (2001) Manufacturing strategy: literature review and some issues. Int J Oper Prod Manag 21(7):884–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leong K, Snyder D, Ward P (1990) Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy. Omega 18(2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giovani JC, Silveira DA (2005) Improving trade-offs in manufacturing: methods and illustration. Int J Prod Econ 95:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Choudhari SC, Adil GK, Usha A (2010) Congruence of manufacturing decision areas in a production system: a research framework. Int J Prod Res 48(20):5963–5989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miltenburg J (2008) Setting manufacturing strategy for factory within factory. Int J Prod Econ 113:307–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jayaram J, Cornelia D, Vickery SK (1999) The impact of human resource management practices on manufacturing performance. J Oper Manag 18:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slack N, Lewis M (2011) Operations strategy. Prentice Hall, UK

    Google Scholar 

  23. Safisadeh MH, Ritzman LP (1997) Linking performance drivers in production planning and inventory control to process choice. J Oper Manag 15(4):389–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kraljic P. (1983) Purchasing must become supply management. Harv Bus Rev 109–117

  25. Vaidya OS, Sushil K (2006) Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications. CEJOR 169:1–29

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Subramanian N, Ramanathan R (2012) A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. Int J Prod Econ 138:215–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ho W, Xiaowei X, Dey PK (2010) Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):16–24

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Korpela J, Tuominen M (1996) Benchmarking logistics performance with an application of the analytic hierarchy process. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 43(3):323–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Felix T, Chan S, Chan H, Henry K, Lau CW, Ralph WLIP (2006) An AHP approach in benchmarking logistics performance of the postal industry. Benchmarking: Int J 13(6):636–661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Partovi, Hopton (1994) The analytic hierarchy process as applied to the inventory types of inventory problem. Prod Invent Manag J 35:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  31. Khalid H, Zhang YB, Malak N (2002) Determining key capabilities of a firm using analytic hierarchy process. Int J Prod Econ 76:39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Akarte MM, Ravi B (2007) Casting product-process-producer compatibility evaluation and improvement. Int J Prod Res 45(21):4917–4936

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Services Sciences 1(1):83–98

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. R. Lekurwale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lekurwale, R.R., Akarte, M.M. & Raut, D.N. Framework to evaluate manufacturing capability using analytical hierarchy process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 565–576 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6284-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6284-7

Keywords

Navigation