Skip to main content
Log in

Composite error prediction of multistage machining processes based on error transfer mechanism

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays, modern manufacturing enterprises are paying more and more attention to machining process quality control in order to ensure the product quality. Since machining quality fluctuation is performed as composite error, then error control is becoming the key point in product quality assurance. However, as a prevention method, error prediction is not used effectively. In this paper, a new method of composite error prediction based on error transfer mechanism is proposed to help control the error sources (man, machine, material, method, measurement and environment, namely 5M1E) in multistage machining processes in order to improve the product quality. Firstly, the formation process of quality fluctuation is introduced, and the quality fluctuation network is established. Secondly, after two kinds of error are defined, the single process independent error formation process and the multistage error transfer mechanism are then analyzed deeply. Thirdly, the single process independent error prediction model is established by using the LS-SVM method and error separation principle, according to which, the composite error of multistage processes is predicted based on error transfer function. Finally, an example of the real specific machining process is given to illustrate the effectiveness and correctness of this methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang GB, Ran Y, Ren XL (2011) Study on product quality tracing technology in supply chain. Comput Ind Eng 60(4):863–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel Y, Fong T, Lawless JF (1998) The analysis of process variation transmission with multivariate measurement. Statistician Sinica 8:47–54

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fenner JS, Jeong MK, Jye-Chyi L (2005) Optimal automatic control of multistage production processes. IEEE Trans Semicond Manuf 18:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun YW, Wang XM, Guo DM, Liu J (2009) Machining localization and quality evaluation of parts with sculptured surfaces using SQP method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11–12):1131–1139

    Google Scholar 

  5. Du SC, Huang DL, Lv J (2013) Recognition of concurrent control chart patterns using wavelet transform decomposition and multiclass support vector machines. Comput Ind Eng 66(4):683–695

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ceglarek D, Shi J (1996) Fixture failure diagnosis for autobody assembly using pattern recognition. ASME J Eng Ind 1:55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Grzesik Z (2005) Experimental errors in studying the defect mobility in nonstoichiometric metal oxide. Defect Diff Forum 237–240:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Qin YT, Zhao LP, Yao YY, Xu DM (2011) Multistage machining processes variation propagation analysis based on machining processes weighted network performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(5–8):487–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luo ZB, Wang JS (1994) Machining error model in manufacturing process. Chin J Mech Eng 30(1):112–118

    Google Scholar 

  10. Du S, Xi L, Pan E (2008) Analysis of product quality with consideration of influence of manufacturing errors indiscrete-product machining systems. Int J Comput Appl Tech 33(1):3–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine inmachine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Process 21(6):2560–2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Abellan-Nebot JV, Liu J, Romero Subiron F (2012) Quality prediction and compensation in multi-station machining processes using sensor-based fixtures. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 28:208–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fan KG, Yang JG, Jiang H, Wang W, Yao XD (2012) Error prediction and clustering compensation on shaft machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(5–8):663–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang PY, Wang Y, Wang HF, Zheng M (2013) Quality prediction of multistage machining processes based on assigned error transfer network. J Mech Eng 49(6):160–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Han CH, Kim MJ, Yoon ES (2008) A hierarchical decision procedure for productivity innovation in large-scale petrochemical processes. Comput Chem Eng 32(4–5):1029–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferreira RJP, Almeida AT, Cavalcante CAV (2008) A multi-criteria decision model to determine inspection intervals of condition monitoring based on delay time analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 24(6):905–912

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang GB, Liu LK, Ren XL, Ji FY, Wang GQ (2010) Key process extraction model based on FAHP and quality house in manufacturing process. ICIME 2010-2010 2nd IEEE Int Conf Inf Manag Eng 3:688–693

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genbao Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, G., Ran, Y., Wang, Y. et al. Composite error prediction of multistage machining processes based on error transfer mechanism. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 271–280 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6253-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6253-1

Keywords

Navigation