Skip to main content
Log in

Restraint of tool path ripple based on the optimization of tool step size for sub-aperture deterministic polishing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tool path ripple error (TPR_error) is one of the main reasons due to the medium-high spatial frequency error on the surface of aspheric optics. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the effect of the tool step size to the TPR_error in sub-aperture deterministic polishing (SDP) and study a method which can optimize the tool step size to restrain this error. Three groups of simulation experiments were conducted using three different tool influence functions to simulate the uniform removal of the material. As the TPR_error is influenced by three factors, which are full width at half maximum (FWHM) of tool influence function (TIF), tool step size, and depth of material removed, each group of the experiments was conducted under the fixed TIF and depth of material removed. It turns out that both peak-to-valley (PV) and root-mean-square (RMS) values of the TPR_error become larger with the increase of the tool step size, and the variation tendency likes a reversed “L” shape curve. And, the method adopted in the simulation was further validated by the experiment. Therefore, the tool step size at the inflection point would be optimal to restrain the TPR_error together with saving the polishing time to a certain extent. This method could be used to determine the best-suited tool step size in SDP whose typical TIF is a Gaussian or Gaussian-like shape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hall PR (1990) Role of asphericity on optical design. Proc SPIE 1320:384–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kordonski W, Golini D, Dumas P, Hogan SJ, Jacobs SD (1998) Magnetorheological suspension-based finishing technology. Proc SPIE 3326:527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kordonski W, Gorodkin S (2011) Material removal in magnetorheological finishing of optics. Appl Opt 50(14):1984–1994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allen LN, Romig HW (1990) Demonstration of an ion figuring process. Proc SPIE 1333:22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jiao C, Li S, Xie X (2009) Algorithm for ion beam figuring of low-gradient mirrors. Appl Opt 48(21):4090–4096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Walker DD, Freeman R, Morton R, McCavana G, Beaucamp A (2006) Use of the ‘Precessions’TM process for prepolishing and correcting 2D & 2(1/2)D form. Opt Express 14(24):11787–11795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walker DD, Brooks D, King A, Freeman R, Morton R, McCavana G, Kim SW (2003) The ‘Precessions’ tooling for polishing and figuring flat, spherical and aspheric surfaces. Opt Express 11(8):958–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang C, Wang Z, Pan R, Peng Y, Liang K, Guo Y (2013) Effect analysis of the residual error evaluation method used in bonnet polishing process for aspheric lens. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2505–2511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhan J (2013) Study on the manufacturing process controlling for aspheric surface ballonet polishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(1–4):171–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fähnle OW, Brug H, Frankena HJ (1998) Fluid jet polishing of optical surfaces. Appl Opt 37(28):6771–6773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li Z, Li S, Dai Y, Peng X (2010) Optimization and application of influence function in abrasive jet polishing. Appl Opt 49(15):2947–2953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiou FJ, Loc PH, Dang NH (2013) Surface finish of bulk metallic glass using sequential abrasive jet polishing and annealing processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1523–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YH, Wu KL, Jhou JH (2013) Two-dimensional vibration-assisted magnetic abrasive finishing of stainless steel SUS304. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2723–2733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tsai FC, Yan BH, Kuan CY (2009) Investigation into superficial embedment in mirror-like machining using abrasive jet polishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(5–6):500–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jones RA (1977) Optimization of computer controlled polishing. Appl Opt 16(1):218–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Schinhaerl M, Rascher R, Stamp R, Smith L, Smith G, Sperber P, Pitschke E (2008) Utilization of time-variant influence functions on the computer controlled polishing. Prec Eng 32(1):47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghigo M, Canestrari R, Spiga D, Novi A (2007) Correction of high spatial frequency errors on optical surfaces by means of ion beam figuring. Proc SPIE 6671:667114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lawson JK, Aikens DM, English RE (1996) Power spectral density specifications for high-power laser systems. Proc SPIE 2775:345–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lawson JK, Auerbach JM, English RE, Henesian MA, Hunt JT, Sacks RA, Trenholme JB, Williams WH, Shoupe MJ, Kelly JH, Cotton CT (1998) NIF optical specifications: the importance of the RMS gradient. Proc SPIE 3492:336–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai Y, Shi F, Peng X, Li S (2009) Restraint of mid-spatial frequency error in magnetorheological finishing (MRF) process by maximum entropy method. Sci China Ser E: Technol Sci 52(10):3902–3097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu H, Dai Y, Peng X (2010) Restraint of tool path ripple based on surface error distribution and process parameters in deterministic finishing. Opt Express 18(22):22973–22981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yu G, Li H, Walker DD (2011) Removal of mid spatial-frequency features in mirror segments. J Eur Opt Soc, Rapid Publ 6:11044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dunn CR, Walker DD (2008) Pseudo-random tool paths for CNC sub-aperture polishing and other applications. Opt Express 16(23):18942–18949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker DD, Beaucamp ATH, Bingham RG, Brooks D, Freeman R, Kim RS, King A, McCavana G, Morton R, Riley D, Simms J (2003) The precessions process for efficient production of aspheric optics for large telescopes and their instrumentation. Proc SPIE 4842:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wu J, Lu Z, Zhang H, Wang T (2009) Dwell time algorithm in ion beam figuring. Appl Opt 48(20):3930–3937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li H, Zhang W, Yu G (2009) Study of weighted space deconvolution algorithm in computer controlled optical surfacing formation. Chin Opt Lett 7(7):627–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Fang H, Guo P, Yu J (2006) Dwell function algorithm in fluid jet polishing. Appl Opt 45(18):4291–4296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Song C, Dai Y, Peng X (2010) Model and algorithm based on accurate realization of dwell time in magnetorheological finishing. Appl Opt 49(19):3676–3683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang C, Wang Z, Yang X, Sun Z, Peng Y, Guo Y, Xu Q (2014) Modeling of the static tool influence function of bonnet polishing based on FEA. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74(1–4):341–349

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Yang, W., Ye, S. et al. Restraint of tool path ripple based on the optimization of tool step size for sub-aperture deterministic polishing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 1431–1438 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6223-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6223-7

Keywords

Navigation