Skip to main content
Log in

Monitoring of grinding wheel defects using recursive estimation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In production engineering, highest surface qualities and low tolerances are produced by grinding processes. Defects of the grinding wheel caused by unbalance, wrong dressing cycles, cavities, or waviness result in vibrations and damage of workpiece or spindle. Therefore, monitoring of the tool is important in practical use. In order to avoid scrap, small faults of the grinding wheel and very small amplitudes of the resulting vibrations are of major interest. This paper presents a new monitoring method, which estimates the defects recursively during the grinding process. Different sensors are analyzed using this method. Among sensors for academic purposes, typical sensors in grinding machines such as the displacement, acceleration, motor current, and acoustic emission are in use for monitoring. Compared to monitoring in the frequency domain and signal feature extraction by filtering, the recursive estimation can reduce noise. In cylindrical plunge grinding, wavy tool defects may result in unequal wear and self-exiting waviness of the wheel over a long period of grinding and start at very low amplitudes. This regenerative chatter is subject of monitoring of highest productivity of grinding processes and is therefore analyzed in this paper as well as the strongly depending selection of dressing cycles initiated by the monitoring algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aurich J, Linke B, Hauschild M, Carrella M, Kirsch B (2013) Sustainability of abrasive processes. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 62(2):653–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wegener K, Hoffmeister H-W, Karpuschewski B, Kuster F, Hahmann W-C, Rabiey M (2011) Conditioning and monitoring of grinding wheels. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 60(2):757–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Badger J, Murphy S, O’Donnell G (2011) The effect of wheel eccentricity and run-out on grinding forces, waviness, wheel wear and chatter. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(10–11):766–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biermann D, Feldhoff M (2011) Influence of controlled tool orientation on pattern formation and waviness in surface grinding. Prod Eng Res Dev 5:31–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Oliveira JFG, Silva E, Guo C, Hashimoto F (2009) Industrial challenges in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58(2):663–680

  6. Teti R, Jemielniak K, O’Donnell G, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(1):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tonshoff HK, Friemuth T, Becker JC (2002) Process monitoring in grinding. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 51(2):551–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karpuschewski B, Inasaki I (2005) Monitoring systems for grinding processes. In: Wang L, Gao RX (Eds) Condition monitoring and control for intelligent manufacturing. Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, pp. 83–107

  9. Litwinski K-M (2011) Sensorisches Spannsystem zur Überwachung von Zerspanprozessen in der Einzelteilfertigung. Dr. -Ing. Diss., Leibniz Universität Hannover

  10. Yang Z, Yu Z (2012) Grinding wheel wear monitoring based on wavelet analysis and support vector machine. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62:107–121

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahrens M, Fischer R, Dagen M, Denkena B, Ortmaier T (2013) Abrasion monitoring and automatic chatter detection in cylindrical plunge grinding. Procedia CIRP 8:374–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fahrmeir L, Kneib T, Lang S (2009) Regression—Modelle, Methoden und Anwendungen. Springer Heidelberg, Dordrecht

  13. Moschytz G, Hotbauer M (2000) Adaptive filter. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Folkerts W (1993) Dynamische Prozesskennwerte des Schleifens und deren Einfluss auf das Prozessverhalten. Dr. -Ing. Diss. RWTH Aachen

  15. Lee D, Hwang I, Valente C, Oliveira JFG, Dornfeld D (2005) Precision manufacturing process monitoring with acoustic emission. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46(2):176–188

  16. Oliveira JFG, Dornfeld DA (2001) Application of ae contact sensing in reliable grinding monitoring. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50:217–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Inasaki I, Karpuschewski B, Lee H-S (2001) Grinding chatter—origin and suppression. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 50:515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruben Fischer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Denkena, B., Ortmaier, T., Ahrens, M. et al. Monitoring of grinding wheel defects using recursive estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 1005–1015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6170-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6170-3

Keywords

Navigation