Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critical analysis of processes and apparatus for industrial surface peening technologies

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to review and evaluate the applications of surface peening processes that can significantly contribute to surface property enhancement and prevent surface-induced failures. In the study, taking account of industrial applications, the current advantages, limitations, technological barriers and future prospects of peening technologies for industrial applications is assessed. Detailed explanations of the recent developments in the main components of peening processes are given. Factors such as peening media, peening process, component geometry, manufacturing method and mechanical properties of the base material are studied using experimental data. Developments in peening processes improved fatigue, corrosion and fretting behaviours of high performance components such as titanium alloy connecting rods for titanium alloy connecting rods for sports car. The results of the study conclude that peening processes have no geometry limitations and produce results that are usually economical.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Azhari A, Schindler C, Li B (2013) Effect of waterjet peening on aluminum alloy 5005. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67:785–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Jinu GR, Sathiya P, Ravichandran G, Rathinam A (2009) Investigation of the fatigue behaviour of butt-welded joints treated by ultrasonic peening process and compared with fatigue life assessment standards. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:74–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar H, Singh S, Kumar P (2013) Modified shot peening process—a review. IJESET 5:12–19

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Metal Improvement Company (2014) Shot peening. Metal Improvement Company web.http://www.metalimprovement.co.uk/controlled-shot-peening.html#section1. Accessed 20 March 2007

  5. Fard SB, Guagliano M (2009) Effects of surfaces nanocrystallization induced by shot peening on material properties: a review. Frattura ed Integrità Strutturale 7:3–16. doi:10.3221/IGF-ESIS.07.01

    Google Scholar 

  6. Shaw MC (1972) New developments in grinding. Carnegie-Mellon University Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  7. Metallurgical Associates Inc (1999) Minutes. Metallurgical Associates Inc, Milwaukee

    Google Scholar 

  8. Metal Improvement Company (2005) Shot peening applications. Metal Improvement Company, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  9. Black JT, Kohser RA, DeGarmos (2008) Materials and processes in manufacturing. Wiley, USA

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shot peening overview. COMCO Web http://www.comcoinc.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/Shot-Peening-Overview.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2014

  11. Shot peening applications. Metal Improvement Company web. Accessed 19 March 2007 http://www.metalimprovement.com//premium/PDF/greenbook_v9/english/Chapter%202.pdf

  12. Chan CY, Lee WB, Wang H (2013) Enhancement of surface finish using water-miscible nano-cutting fluid in ultra-precision turning. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 73:62–70. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2013.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guernic YL (1988) Shot peening retards fretting. Metal lmprovement Company 11.nd conference on shot peening CETlM, Senlis

  14. Higounenc O (2005) Correlation of shot peening parameters to surface characteristic. ICSP9 : SHOT PEENING, Montargis

  15. Behal J (2004) life extension of fatigued steel specimens by shot peening. 3rd Youth Symposium on Experimental Solid Mechanics Web http://www.ysesm.ing.unibo.it/ysesm2004/Abstracts/Behal.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2014

  16. Technical review, progress in the application of shot-peening technology for automotive engine components, Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd., 1998

  17. How is shot peening intensity measured? Saranindustries Web. http://www.saranindustries.com/shot-peening/how-is-shot-peening-measured.asp. Accessed 21 March 2014

  18. Mahagaonkar SB, Brahmankar PK, Seemikeri CY (2008) Effect of shot peening parameters on microhardness of AISI 1045 and 316L material: an analysis using design of experiment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:563–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sara B, Ramin G, Guagliano M (2012) On the shot peening surface coverage and its assessment by means of finite element simulation: a critical review and some original developments. Appl Surf Sci 259:186–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Leon FP (2001) Determination of the coverage of shot peened surfaces. In Brebbia C (ed) Surface treatment V: computer methods and experimental measurements, Wessex Inst Technol, SEVILLE pp 323–332

  21. Meguid S (1991) Effect of partial-coverage upon the fatigue fracture-behavior of peened components. Fatigue Fract Eng M 14:515–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohara P (1984) A note on the use of dyescan tracers as a quality-control tool for coverage determination in controlled shot-peening. J Mech Work Technol 10:187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zheng C, Sun S, Ji Z, Wang W, Liu J (2010) Numerical simulation and experimentation of micro scale laser bulge forming. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 50:1048–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang X, Du D, Zhang H, Shen Z, Liu H, Zhou J, Liu H, Hu Y, Gu C (2013) Investigation of microscale laser dynamic flexible forming process—simulation and experiment. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 67:8–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ulutan D, Ozel T (2011) Machining induced surface integrity in titanium and nickel alloys: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 51:250–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Trškoa L, Boku O, Novy´ F, Guagliano M (2014) Effect of severe shot peening on ultra-high-cycle fatigue of a low-alloy steel. Mater Design 57:103–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. WPC treatment (2014) Reduced friction. Metal surface treatment for motor sports web. http://www.wpctreatment.com. Accessed 25 March 2014

  28. Marsh R (2011), Experimental analysis of oil based cavitation peening in air. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  29. Deguchi D, Mouri M, Hara J, Kano D, Shimoda T, Inamura F, Fukuoka T, Koshio K (2012) Fatigue strength improvement for ship structures by ultrasonic peening. J MAR SCI TECHNOL17:360–369

  30. Hirano S, Hamasaki K, Okimura K, Maintenance activities for Alloy 600 in PWR plants. E-J Adv Maint l2:1–3

  31. Todaka Y, Umemoto M, Tsuchiya K (2005) Comparison of nanocrystalline surface layer in steels formed by air blast and ultrasonic shot peening. Mater Trans 45:376–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Toyo Seiko Co. Ltd. (2014)Ultrasonic shot peening. Toyo Seiko Co Web. www.toyoseiko.co.jp

  33. Yoda M, Newton B (2008) Underwater laser peening. Welding and Repair Technology for Power Plants Eighth International EPRI Conference. Fort Myers, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  34. Im J, Grandhi RV, Ro Y (2012) Residual stress behaviours induced by laser peening along the edge of curved models. J Mech Sci Technol 26:3943–3952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Toparlı MB, Fitzpatrick ME, Gungor S (2013) Improvement of the contour method for measurement of near-surface residual stresses from laser peening. Exp Mech 53:1705–1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Satihyajith S, Kalainathan S, Swaroop S (2013) Laser peening without coating on aluminium alloy Al-6061-T6 using low energy Nd:YAG laser. Opt Laser Technol 45:389–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Maawad E, Sano Y, Wagner L, Brookmeier HG, Genzel C (2012) Investigation of laser shock peening effects on residual stress state and fatigue performance of titanium alloys. Mater Sci Eng:A 536:82–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Soyama H (2004) Introduction of compressive residual stress using a cavitating jet in air. J Eng Mater Technol Trans 126:123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Soyama H, Homma K (2004) Cavitation peening by using cavitating jet in air. 3rd Youth Symposium on Experimental Solid Mechanics Web. http://www.ysesm.ing.unibo.it/ysesm2004/Abstracts/Behal.pdf. Accessed 21 March 2014

  40. Mitsubishi Havy Industries Ltd (2014) Water jet peening technology for preventing stress corrosion cracking by using cavitations. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries web. http://www.jsm.or.jp/ejam/Vol.1.No.2/NT/7/article.html. Accessed 25 March 2014

  41. Ormond Inc (20014) Cavitation peening. Ormond Inc Web. http://www.ormondllc.com/#cavitation_peening

  42. Gao Y, Wu B, Liu Z, Zhou Y, Shen N, Ding H (2013) Ultrasonic cavitation peening of stainless steel and nickel alloy. J Manuf Sci Eng 136:1–5. doi:10.1115/1.4025756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Grinspan AS, Gnanamoorthy R (XXXX) Development of a novel oil cavitation jet peening system and cavitation jet erosion in aluminum alloy, AA 6063-T6. J. Fluids Eng 131:1–6. doi:10.1115/1.3129134

  44. Yildirim HC, Marquis GB (2013) Fatigue strength improvement factors for high strength steel welded joints treated by high frequency mechanical impact. Int J Fatigue. doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2012.05.002

    Google Scholar 

  45. Lechner C, Bleicher F, Habersohn C, Bauer C, Goessinger S (2012) The use of machine hammer peening technology for smoothening and structuring of surfaces. In: Katalinic B (ed) Proceedings of the 23rd International DAAAM Symposium. DAAAM International, Vienna, pp 331–336

    Google Scholar 

  46. http://accurapuls.de/Verfahrensbeschreibung%20_englisch.html, (2010). Website accurapuls GmbH, Accessed on: 2012-07-02

  47. Bleicher F, Lechner C, Habersohn C, Kozeschnik E, Adjassoho B, Kaminski H (2012) Mechanism of surface modification using machine hammer peening technology. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 61:375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Tenaglia RD, Lahrman DE (2003) Preventing fatigue failures with laser peening. AMPTIAC 7:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  49. Yu H, Dong JL, Yoo DH, Shin K (2009) Effect of ultrasonic and air blast shot peening on the microstructural. J Korean Phys Soc 54:1161–1166

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manufacturing Engineering Department, Institute of Applied and Natural Sciences, Mersin University, 33480, Tarsus, Mersin, Turkey

    Mustafa Kemal Kulekci & Ugur Esme

  2. Faculty of Tarsus Technology, Mersin University, 33480, Tarsus, Mersin, Turkey

    Mustafa Kemal Kulekci & Ugur Esme

Authors
  1. Mustafa Kemal Kulekci
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ugur Esme
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Kemal Kulekci.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kulekci, M.K., Esme, U. Critical analysis of processes and apparatus for industrial surface peening technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74, 1551–1565 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6088-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6088-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation