Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of formabilities of stainless steel 316L bipolar plates using static and dynamic load stamping

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, SUS316L is selected as an ideal material because of its easy workability and excellent corrosion resistance. The press equipment used in this study is a material testing system with a rated load of 25 t. Bipolar plates are manufactured, and their formabilities are evaluated according to various parameters (type of load, load size, die radius (R), and number of cycles) for dynamic load stamping. The bipolar plate formed using a sine-wave dynamic load (17 cycles, load of 50–120 kN) with a die radius of 0.3 mm has 15.0 % deeper channels than one formed with a static load of 120 kN. Moreover, when R is 0.1 mm, the bipolar plate formed using a square-wave dynamic load has 26 % deeper channels than one formed with a static load. Plates formed using sine-wave dynamic loads with R values of 0.1 and 0.3 mm have channel depths of 0.320 and 0.445 mm, respectively. Compared to an R value of 0.1 mm, the use of an R value of 0.3 mm produces channels that are 28 % deeper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hamilton PJ, Pollet BG (2010) Polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) flow field plate: Design, materials and characterisation. Fuel Cells 10:489–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang Y, Chen KS, Mishler J, Cho SC, Adroher XC (2011) A review of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells: Technology, applications, and needs on fundamental research. Appl Energy 88:981–1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mehta V, Cooper JS (2003) Review and analysis of PEM fuel cell design and manufacturing. J Power Sources 114:32–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang H, Turner JA (2010) Reviewing metallic PEMFC bipolar plates. Fuel Cells 10:510–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Middelman E, Kout W, Vogelaar B, Lenssen J, Waal E (2003) Bipolar plates for PEM fuel cells. J Power Sources 118:44–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dihrab SS, Sopian K, Alghoul MA, Sulaiman MY (2009) Review of the membrane and bipolar plates materials for conventional and unitized regenerative fuel cells. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13:1663–1668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hung JC, Yang TC, Li KC (2011) Studies on the fabrication of metallic bipolar plates-using micro electrical discharge machining milling. J Power Sources 196:2070–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kwon HJ, Jeon YP, Kang CG (2013) Effect of progressive forming process and processing variables on the formability of aluminium bipolar plate with microchannel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64:681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mahabunphachai S, Cora ÖN, Koç M (2010) Effect of manufacturing processes on formability and surface topography of proton exchange membrane fuel cell metallic bipolar plates. J Power Sources 195:5269–5277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peng L, Lai X, Liu D, Hu P, Ni J (2008) Flow channel shape optimum design for hydroformed metal bipolar plate in PEM fuel cell. J Power Sources 178:223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Y, Hua L (2010) Fabrication of metallic bipolar plate for proton exchange membrane fuel cells by rubber pad forming. J Power Sources 195:3529–3535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeong MG, Jin CK, Hwang GW, Kang CG (2014) Formability evaluation of stainless steel bipolar plate considering draft angle of die and process parameters by rubber forming. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 15:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jin CK, Jeong MG, Kang CG (2014) Fabrication of titanium bipolar plates by rubber forming and performance of single cell using TiN-coated titanium bipolar plates. Int J Hydrog Energy. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2014.03.013

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lim SS, Kim YT, Kang CG (2013) Fabrication of aluminum 1050 micro-channel proton exchange membrane fuel cell bipolar plate using rubber-pad-forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65:231–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee SJ, Chen YP, Huang CH (2005) Electroforming of metallic bipolar plates with micro-featured flow field. J Power Sources 145:369–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jin CK, Kang CG (2011) Fabrication process analysis and experimental verification for aluminum bipolar plates in fuel cells by vacuum die-casting. J Power Sources 196:8241–8249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin CK, Kang CG (2012) Fabrication by vacuum die casting and simulation of aluminum bipolar plates with micro-channels on both sides for proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells. Int J Hydrog Energy 37:1661–1676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jin CK, Jung MG, Kang CG (2014) Fabrication of aluminum bipolar plates by semi-solid forging process and performance test of TiN coated aluminum bipolar plates. Fuel Cells. doi:10.1002/fuce.201300137

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jin CK, Jang CH, Kang CG (2014) Effect of the process parameters on the formability, microstructure, and mechanical properties of thin plates fabricated by rheology forging process with electromagnetic stirring method. Metall Mater Trans B 45:193–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chung Gil Kang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, MJ., Jin, CK. & Kang, C.G. Comparison of formabilities of stainless steel 316L bipolar plates using static and dynamic load stamping. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 75, 651–657 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5986-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5986-1

Keywords

Navigation