Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real-time fuzzy-clustering and CART rules classification of the characteristics of emitted acoustic emission during horizontal single-grit scratch tests

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the unit event of material iteraction in grinding three phenomena are involved, namely: rubbing, ploughing and cutting. Where ploughing and rubbing essentially mean the energy is being applied less efficiently in terms of material removal. Such phenomena usually occurs before or after cutting. Based on this distinction, it is important to identify the effects of these different phenomena experienced during grinding. Acoustic emission (AE) of the material grit interaction is considered the most sensitive monitoring process to investigate such miniscule material change. For this reason, two AE sensors were used to pick up energy information (one verifying the other) correlated to material measurements of the horizontal scratch groove profiles. Such material measurements would display both the material plastic deformation and material removal mechanisms. Accurate material surface profile measurements of the cut groove were made using the Fogale Photomap Profiler which enables the comparison between the corresponding AE signal scratch data. By using short-time Fourier transforms (STFT) and filtration, the salient features for identifying and classifying the phenomena were more distinct between the three different levels of single-grit (SG) phenomena. Given such close data segregation between the phenomenon data sets, fuzzy clustering/genetic algorithm (GA) classification techniques were used to classify and verify the demarcation of SG phenomena. After the cutting, ploughing and rubbing gave a high confidence in terms of classification accuracy, the results from the unit/micro-event to the multi/macro-event, both 1-μm and 0.1-mm grinding test data, were applied to the named classifier for classification. Interesting output results correlated for the classifier signifying a distinction that there is more cutting utilisation than both ploughing and rubbing as the interaction between grit and workpiece become more involved (measured depth of cut increases). With the said classifier technique it is possible to get a percentage utilisation of the grit and material interaction phenomena. In addition, optimised fuzzy clustering was verified against a classification and regression tree (CART) rule-based system giving transparent rule classification. Such findings were then realised into a Simulink model as a potential control system for a micro-grinding simulation or, for real-time industrial control purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Royer D, Dieulesaint E (2000) Elastic waves in solids I, II. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith SW (1997) The Scientist and Engineer’s Guide to Digital Signal

  3. Griffin J, Chen X (2009) Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests—part 1 characteristics and identification. International Journal Abrasive Technologies—Special Issue on: “Micro/Meso Mechanical Manufacturing (M4 Process)”. Vol., 1, No 4

  4. Chen X, Griffin J, Liu Q (2007) Mechanical and thermal behaviours of grinding acoustic emission. Int J Manuf Technol Manag (IJMTM) 12(1~3):184–199

    Google Scholar 

  5. Webster J, Marinescu I, Bennett R (1994) Acoustic emission for process control and monitoring of surface integrity during grinding. Ann CIRP 43(1):299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Coman R, Marinescu ID et al (1999) Acoustic emission signal—an effective tool for monitoring the grinding process. Abrasives

  7. Chen M, Xue BY (1999) Study on acoustic emission in the grinding process automation. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Manufacturing Engineering Division, MED Manufacturing Science and Engineering—1999 (The ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition), Nov 14–Nov 19 1999, Nashville, TN, USA, ASME, Fairfield, NJ, USA

  8. Holford KM (2000) Acoustic emission—basic principles and future directions. Strain 36(2):51–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li X (1998) Tool wear monitoring with wavelet packet transform-fuzzy clustering method. Wear 219(2):145–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Subhash G, Loukus JE, Pandit SM (2001) Application of data dependent systems approach for evaluation of fracture modes during single-grit scratching. Mech Mater 34:25–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang H, Subhash G (2002) An approximate upper bound approach for single-grit rotating scratch with a conical tool on pure metal. Wear 252:911–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamed MS (1977) Grinding mechanics—single grit approach. Ph,D. thesis, Leicester Polytechnic

  13. Clausen R, Wang CY, Meding M (1996) Characteristics of acoustic emission during single diamond scratching of granite. Ind Diam Rev 3:96–99

    Google Scholar 

  14. Xiaoli L, Yingxue Y, Zhejun Y (1997) On-line tool condition monitoring system with wavelet fuzzy neural network. J Intell Manuf 8:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ren Q, Balazinski M, Baron L (2012) Fuzzy identification of cutting acoustic emission with extended subtractive cluster analysis. Nonlinear Dynamics. 67(4), pp 2599–2608. Processing California Technical Publishing, ISBN 0-9660176-3-3

  16. Ren Q, Balazinski M, Jemielniak K, Baron L, Achiche S (2013) Experimental and fuzzy modelling analysis on dynamic cutting force in micro milling. Soft Comput 17:1687–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strang G, Nguyen T (1996) Wavelets and filter banks. Wesley Cambridge Press, ISBN 0-9614088-7-1, pp 1–29 61–68

  18. Griffin J, Chen X (2009), Characteristics of the acoustic emission during horizontal single grit scratch tests—part 2 classification and grinding tests. International Journal Abrasive Technologies—Special Issue on: “Micro/Meso Mechanical Manufacturing (M4 Process)”. Vol., 1, No 4

  19. Barbezat M, Brunner AJ, Flueler P, Huber C, Kornmann X (2004) Acoustic emission sensor properties of active fibre composite elements compared with commercial acoustic emission sensors. Sensors Actuators 114:13–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Boczar T, Lorenc M (2006) Time-frequency analysis of the calibrating signals generated in the Hsu–Nielsen system. Phys Chem Solid State 7(3):585–588

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hwang TW, Whitenton EP, Hsu NN, Blessing GV, Evans CJ (2000) Acoustic emission monitoring of high speed grinding of silicon nitride. Ultrasonics 38:614–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kalpakjian S, Schmid SR (2003) Manufacturing process for engineering materials. Prentice Hall, ISBN 0-13-040871-9, pp 510–520

  23. Opoz T, Chen X (2012) Experimental investigation of material removal mechanism in single grit grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 63:32–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Griffin J, Chen X (2009) Multiple classification of the acoustic emission signals extracted during burn and chatter anomalies using genetic programming. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(11–12):1152–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cuevas A, Febrero M, Fraiman R (2001) Cluster analysis: a further approach based on density estimation. Comput Stat Data Anal 36:441–459

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Hartigan J (1985) Statistical theory in clustering. J Classif 2:63–76

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C (1984) Classification and regression trees. Wadsworth, Belmont

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Coppersmith D, Hong SJ, Hosking JRM (1999) Partitioning nominal attributes in decision trees. Data Min Knowl Disc 3:197–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Huang-Cheng C, Wang JJ (2008) A stochastic grinding force model considering random grit distribution. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(12–13):1335–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Griffin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffin, J., Chen, X. Real-time fuzzy-clustering and CART rules classification of the characteristics of emitted acoustic emission during horizontal single-grit scratch tests. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 74, 481–502 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5959-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5959-4

Keywords

Navigation