Skip to main content
Log in

Interactive influence of linked characteristics during machining of thin-walled parts

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Today, characteristic-based quality analysis has been popular in academia and industry with its ability to show the error evolution of parts during manufacturing. To date, research on characteristics mainly focuses on characteristic sequence, characteristic extraction, characteristic deflection, and characteristic identification, which are all for individual characteristics. However, a key characteristic is not only influenced by each machining itself but also by further machining linked-characteristics. This paper analyzes manufacturing characteristic interactions and presents algorithms, simulation, and experiment for linked characteristic interactions in manufacturing process planning. Firstly, a geometric model shows the tolerance/datum interactions. Secondly, thin-walled parts of aluminum alloy are used to analyze and simulate the machining interactions based on ANSYS system. By analyzing the simulation and experiment results, discussion and evaluation of the results and conclusions are submitted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen W, Xue J, Tang D, Chen H, Qu S (2009) Deformation prediction and error compensation in multilayer milling processes for thin-walled parts. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(11):859–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liao YG, Hu SJ (2001) An integrated model of a fixture–workpiece system for surface quality prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 17:810–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Qin G, Zhang W, Wu Z, Wan M (2007) Systematic modeling of workpiece-fixture geometric default and compliance for the prediction of workpiece machining error. J Manuf Sci Eng 129:789–801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu S, Zheng L, Zhang Z, Li Z, Liu D (2007) Optimization of the number and positions of fixture locators in the peripheral milling of a low-rigidity workpiece. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang MY (2003) Contact force prediction and force closure analysis of a fixtured rigid workpiece with friction. J Manuf Sci Eng 125:325–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wan XJ, Xiong CH, Wang XF, Zhang XM, Xiong YL (2010) A machining-feature-driven approach to locating scheme in multi-axis milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:42–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heo E-Y, Kim DW, Lee JY, Lee CS, Chen FF (2011) High speed pocket milling planning by feature-based machining area partitioning. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27:706–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hayes C (1990) Machining planning: a model of an expert level planning process, Ph.D. Dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University, USA

  9. Sormaz D (2000) Modeling of manufacturing feature interactions for automated process planning. J Manuf Syst 19:28–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen CLP, Le Clair SR (1994) Integration of design and manufacturing: solving setup generation and feature sequencing using an unsupervised learning approach. Comput Aided Des 26:59–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dipper T, Xu X, Klemm P (2011) Defining, recognizing and representing feature interactions in a feature-based data model. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27(1):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Deja M, Siemiatkowski MS (2013) Feature-based generation of machining process plans for optimised parts manufacture. J Intell Manuf 24:831–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sunil VB, Pande SS (2009) Automatic recognition of machining features using artificial neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:932–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hart AJ, Slocum A, Willoughby P (2004) Kinematic coupling interchangeability. Precis Eng 28:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang Q, Shi J, Yuan J (2003) Part dimensional error and its propagation modeling in multi-operational machining processes. J Manuf Sci Eng 125(2):255–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding Y, Ceglarek D, Shi J (2002) Fault diagnosis of multistage manufacturing processes by using state space approach. J Manuf Sci Eng 124(2):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Camelio JA, Hu SJ, Marin S (2004) Compliant assembly variation analysis using components geometric covariance. J Manuf Sci Eng 126(2):355–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Wang L (2007) Sequencing of interacting prismatic machining features for process planning. Comput Ind 58:295–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bravo U, Altuzarra O, Lo´pez de Lacalle LN, Sa´nchez JA, Campa FJ (2005) Stability limits of milling considering the flexibility of the workpiece and the machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1669–1680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to XiaoYan Zuo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, B., Zuo, X., Yang, J. et al. Interactive influence of linked characteristics during machining of thin-walled parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 72, 1727–1734 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5797-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5797-4

Keywords

Navigation