Skip to main content

Selection of optimal process parameters in WEDM while machining Al7075/SiCp metal matrix composites

The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology volume 73, pages 299–314 (2014)Cite this article

Abstract

Aluminium metal matrix composites (MMCs) reinforced with silicon carbide particulate (SiCp) find several applications due to their improved mechanical properties over the conventional metals for a wide variety of aerospace and automotive applications. However, the presence of discontinuously distributed hard ceramic in the MMCs made them as difficult-to-cut materials for conventional machining methods. The wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM), as a widely adopted non-traditional machining method for difficult-to-cut precision components, found an appropriate metal removal process for MMCs to enhance quality of cut within the stipulated cost. While machining the advanced materials like MMCs, a clear understanding into the machining performance of the process for its control variables could make the process uncomplicated and economical. In light of the growing industrial need of making high performance-low cost components, the investigation aimed to explore the machining performance characteristics of SiCp reinforced Al7075 matrix composites (Al7075/SiCp) during WEDM. While conducting the machining experiments, surface roughness, metal removal rate, and wire wear ratio are considered the responses to evaluate the WEDM performance. Response surface methodology is used to develop the empirical models for these WEDM responses. SiC particulate size and volume percentages are considered the process variables along with pulse-on time, pulse-off time, and wire tension. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is used to check the adequacy of the developed models. Since the machining responses are conflicting in nature, the problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization problem and is solved using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II to obtain the set of Pareto-optimal solutions. The derived optimal process responses are confirmed by the experimental validation tests, and the results are analyzed by SEM.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

USD 39.95

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

References

  1. Sikder S, Kishawy HA (2012) Analytical model for force prediction when machining metal matrix composite. Int J Mech Sci 59:95–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li X, Seah WKH (2001) Tool wear acceleration in relation to workpiece reinforcement percentage in cutting of metal matrix composites. Wear 247:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahin Y (2003) Preparation and some properties of SiC particle reinforced aluminium alloy composites. Mater Des 24:671–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciftci I, Turker M, Seker U (2004) CBN cutting tool wear during machining of particulate reinforced MMCs. Wear 257:1041–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. E. Kılıçkap, O. Çakır, M. Aksoy, A. İnan, Study of tool wear and surface roughness in machining of homogenised SiC-p reinforced aluminium metal matrix composite, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 164–165 (2005) 862–867

  6. Mannaa A, Bhattacharayya B (2003) A study on machinability of Al/SiC-MMC. J Mater Process Technol 140:711–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heath PJ (2001) Developments in applications of PCD tooling. J Mater Process Technol 116:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paulo Davim J (2002) Diamond tool performance in machining metal–matrix composites. J Mater Process Technol 128:100–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andrewes CJE, Feng H-Y, Lau WM (2000) Machining of an aluminum/SiC composite using diamond inserts. J Mater Process Technol 102:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Muthukrishnan N, Murugan M, Prahlada Rao K (2008) Machinability issues in turning of Al-SiC (10p) metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:211–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanikumar K, Muthukrishnan N, Hariprasad KS (2008) Surface roughness parameters optimization in machining a356/ SiC/20p metal matrix composites by PCD tool using response surface methodology and desirability function. Mach Sci Technol 12:529–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Senthilkumar RC, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R (2009) Study of electrochemical machining characteristics of Al/SiCp composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kok M (2010) Tool life modeling for evaluating the effects of cutting speed and reinforcements on the machining of particle reinforced metal matrix composites. Int J Miner Metall Mater 17(3):353–362

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho KH, Newman ST, Rahimifard S, Allen RD (2004) State of the art in wire electrical discharge machining (WEDM). Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1247–1259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yan BH, Tsai HC, Huang FY, Lee LC (2005) Examination of wire electrical discharge machining of Al2O3p /6061Al composites. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Patil NG, Brahmankar PK (2006) Some investigations into wire electro-discharge machining performance of Al/SiCp composites. Int J Mach Mach Mater 1(4):412–431

    Google Scholar 

  17. Manna A, Bhattacharyya B (2006) Taguchi and Gauss elimination method: A dual response approach for parametric optimization of CNC wire cut EDM of PR AlSiC MMC. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Seo YW, Kim D, Ramulu M (2006) Electrical discharge machining of functionally graded 15–35 vol % SiCp/Al composites. J Mater Manuf Proc 21:479–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sushant D, Rajesh P, Nishant S, Akhil S, Hemath Kumar G (2007) Mathematical modeling of electric discharge machining of cast Al-4Cu-6Si alloy-10 wt. % SiCp composites. J Mater Process Technol 194:24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Karthikeyan R, Lakshmi Narayanan PR, Naagarazan RS (1999) Mathematical modeling for electric discharge machining of aluminium–silicon carbide particulate composites. J Mater Process Technol 87:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Warrier Ashish M, George PM, Raghunath BK, Manocha LM (2004) EDM machining of carbon–carbon composite–A Taguchi approach. J Mater Process Technol 145:66–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Habib SS (2009) Study of the parameters in electrical discharge machining throughresponse surface methodology approach. Appl Math Model 33:4397–4407

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Garg RK, Singh KK, Anish S, Sharma VS, Kuldeep O, Sharanjit S (2010) Review of research work in sinking EDM and WEDM on metal matrix composite materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalyanmoy D, Samir A, Amrit P, Meyarivan T (2002) A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans Evol Comput 6:2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Box GEP, Wilson KB (1951) On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions (with discussion). J R Stat Soc Ser B 13(1):1–45

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kilickap E, Huseyinoglu M, Yardimeden A (2011) Optimization of drilling parameters on surface roughness in drilling of AISI 1045 using response surface methodology and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:79–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Palanikumar K (2007) Modeling and analysis for surface roughness in machining glass fibre reinforced plastics using response surface methodology. Mater Des 28:2611–2618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Palanikumar K, Latha B, Senthilkumar VS, Karthikeyan R (2009) Multiple performance optimization in machining of GFRP composites by a PCD tools using non dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Met Mater Int 15(2):249–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kansal HK, Sehijpal S, Kumar P (2005) Parametric optimization of powder mixed electrical discharge machining by response surface methodology. Int J Mater Proc Technol 169:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yusuf Sahin A, Motorcu R (2005) Surface roughness model for machining mild steel. Mater Des 26(4):321–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghafari S, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Zinatizadeh AA (2009) Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation–flocculation treatment of leachate using poly-aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J Hazard Mater 163:650–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stat-Ease Inc (2001) Design-Expert Software, Educational Version 6.0.9 for Windows, John Wiley & Sons, Inc

  33. Kanagarajan D, Karthikeyan R, Palanikumar K, Paulo Davim J (2008) Optimization of electrical discharge machining characteristics of WC/Co composites using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA-II). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 36:1124–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Saravanan R, Ramabalan S, Godwin Raja Ebenezer N, Natarajan R (2009) Evolutionary bi-criteria optimum design of robots based on task specifications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:386–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mandal D, Pal SK, Partha S (2007) Modelling of electrical discharge machining process using back propagation neural network and multi-objective optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II. J Mate Proc Technol 186:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Deb K (2001) Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. Wiley, Chichester

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Bhushan RK, Kumar S, Das S (2013) Fabrication and characterization of 7075 Al alloy reinforced with SiC particulates. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65(5–8):611–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Palanikumar K, Karthikeyan R (2006) Optimal machining conditions for turning of particulate metal matrix composites using Taguchi and response surface methodologies. Mach Sci Technol: Intern J 10(4):417–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Montgomery DC, Peck EA, Vining GG (2003) Introduction to linear regression analysis, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, GITAM University, Hyderabad Campus, 502 329, India

    Thella Babu Rao

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College of Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada, 533 003, Andhra Pradesh, India

    A. Gopala Krishna

Authors
  1. Thella Babu Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Gopala Krishna
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thella Babu Rao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rao, T.B., Krishna, A.G. Selection of optimal process parameters in WEDM while machining Al7075/SiCp metal matrix composites. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73, 299–314 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5780-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5780-0

Keywords

  • Al7075/SiCp
  • Stir casting
  • WEDM
  • Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II