Skip to main content
Log in

Continuous variable feed rate: a novel method for improving infeed grinding processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a novel method for improving infeed grinding processes based on the application of continuous variable feed rate (CVFR). Nowadays, infeed cycle configuration is defined by selecting constant feed rates and stock removals for each consecutive stage, normally roughing, finishing, and a final spark-out, for the purpose of achieving required workpiece tolerances in a fixed time while avoiding process limitations and instabilities. CVFR leads to more efficient cycles without the difficulty of defining feed rate and stock removal values. To that end, CVFR has been implemented in a time-domain simulation of infeed grinding processes to analyze theoretically the influence of variation parameters in process forces, workpiece roughness, roundness and size tolerance, or dynamic behavior. Then, tests have been performed to validate the simulation approach, comparing CVFR cycles with equivalent conventional ones. Different types of downward variations for the feed rate have been applied, concluding that grinding processes can be improved with this method regarding productivity and workpiece geometrical and surface tolerances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology: theory and applications of machining with abrasives. SME, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  2. Saljé E, Mushardt H, Sherf E (1980) Optimization of short grinding cycles. CIRP Ann 29(2):477–495

    Google Scholar 

  3. Peters J, Aerens R (1980) Optimization procedure of three phase grinding cycles of series without intermediate dressing. CIRP Ann 29:195–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Amitay G, Malkin S, Koren Y (1981) Adaptive control optimization of grinding. ASME J Ind 103(1):102–111

    Google Scholar 

  5. Xiao G, Malkin S, Danai K (1993) Autonomous system for multi-stage cylindrical grinding. ASME J Dyn Syst Meas Control 115(4):667–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiao G, Malkin S (1996) On-line optimization for internal plunge grinding. CIRP Ann 45(1):287–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gallego I (2007) Intelligent centerless grinding: global solution for process instabilities and optimal cycle design. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 56:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hashimoto F, Lahoti G (2004) Optimization of set-up conditions for stability of the centerless grinding process. CIRP An-Manuf Technol 53:271–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrenetxea D, Marquinez JI, Alvarez J, Fernandez R, Gallego I, Maradiaga J, Garitaonandia I (2012) Model-based assistant tool for the setting-up and optimization of centerless grinding process. Mach Sci Technol 16:510–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y, Jones B (1992) An optimum size and roundness adaptive control method for the plunge grinding process. J Syst Control Eng 206:107–116

    Google Scholar 

  11. Allason DR, Rowe WB, Chen X, Boyle A (1997) Automatic dwell control in computer numerical control plunge grinding. Proc Inst Mech Eng 211(B):565–575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Malkin S, Koren Y (1984) Optimal infeed control for accelerated spark-out in plunge grinding. J Eng Ind 106:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dong S, Danai K, Malkin S, Deshmukh A (2004) Continuous optimal infeed control for cylindrical plunge grinding, part 1: methodology. J Manuf Sci Eng 126:327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Inasaki I, Karpuschewski B, Lee H (2001) Grinding chatter—origin and suppression. CIRP Ann-Manuf Tech 50:515–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Barrenetxea D, Marquinez JI, Bediaga I, Uriarte L (2009) Continuous workpiece speed variation (CWSV): model based practical application to avoid chatter in grinding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Tech 58:319–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Alvarez J, Barrenetxea D, Marquinez JI, Bediaga I, Gallego I (2011) Effectiveness of continuous workpiece speed variation (CWSV) for chatter avoidance in throughfeed centerless grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:911–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramos JC, Vinolas J, Nieto FJ (2001) A simplified methodology to determine the cutting stiffness and the contact stiffness in the plunge grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Alvarez J, Zatarain M, Barrenetxea D, Ortega N, Gallego I (2013) Semi-discretization for stability analysis of in-feed cylindrical grinding with continuous workpiece speed variation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hecker R, Liang S (2003) Predictive modeling of surface roughness in grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:755–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gopal AV, Rao PV (2004) A new chip-thickness model for performance assessment of silicon carbide grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:816–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge Alvarez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvarez, J., Barrenetxea, D., Marquinez, J.I. et al. Continuous variable feed rate: a novel method for improving infeed grinding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 73, 53–61 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5771-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5771-1

Keywords

Navigation