Skip to main content
Log in

Influences of dressing lead on surface roughness of ultrasonic-assisted grinding

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the surface characteristics of the grinding wheel as well as its correlation with the grinding performance are largely influenced by dressing lead in conventional grinding (CG), little focus is placed on dressing lead in ultrasonic-assisted grinding (UAG). In this research, the effects of dressing lead and ultrasonic vibration on ultrasonic-assisted grinding are studied. Longitudinal vibration at ultrasonic frequency range is applied to the workpiece. The surface roughness and the characteristics of the three-dimensional ground surface morphology are compared between CG and UAG at several dressing leads and vibration amplitudes. The kinematics of the peak of the grinding wheel is employed for the theoretical analysis. The results show that the surface roughness has been improved for all UAG experiments and that the vibration amplitudes have exerted different influences on the surface roughness at different dressing leads. The dressing lead is an optimum one when it is four times the amplitude, at which minimal surface roughness is produced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tawakoli T, Azarhoushang B (2008) Influence of ultrasonic vibration on dry grinding of soft steel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 48(14):1585–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tawakoli T, Azarhoushang B (2009) Effects of ultrasonic assisted grinding on CBN grinding wheels performance. Proceedings of the ASME 2009 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference

  3. Nik MG, Movahhedy MR, Akbari J (2012) Ultrasonic-assisted grinding of Ti6Al4V alloy. Procedia CIRP 1:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhaduri D, Soo SL, Aspinwall DK, Novovic D, Harden P, Bohr S, Martin D (2012) A study on ultrasonic assisted creep feed grinding of nickel based superalloys. Procedia CIRP 1:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Denkena B, Frienmuth T, Reichstein M (2003) Potentials of different process kinematics in micro grinding. CIRP Ann-Manufactur Technol 52(1):463–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yanyan Y, Bo Z, Junli L (2008) Ultraprecision surface finishing of nano-ZrO2 ceramics using two-dimensional ultrasonic assisted grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43(5–6):462–467

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zapp M (1998) Ultraschallunterrstutztes Schleifen von Hochleistungskeramik-Ein Beitrag zur gezielten Beeinflussung der Eigenschaften von Bauteilen durch eine ganzheitliche Prozekettenbetrachtung, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Kaiserslautern

  8. Malkin S (1998) Grinding Technology. Ellis Horwood, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nguyen AT, Butler DL (2008) Correlation of grinding wheel topography and grinding performance: a study from a viewpoint of three-dimensional surface characterization. J Mater Process Technol 208(1–3):14–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen HF, Tang JY, Zhou W (2013) An experimental study of the effects of ultrasonic vibration on grinding surface roughness of C45 carbon steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68(9–12):2095–2098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen X, Brian Rowe W (1996) Analysis and simulation of the grinding process. Part I: generation of the grinding wheel surface. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36(8):871–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinyuan Tang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, H., Tang, J., Lang, X. et al. Influences of dressing lead on surface roughness of ultrasonic-assisted grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71, 2011–2015 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5636-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-5636-7

Keywords

Navigation