Skip to main content
Log in

How microtool dimension influences electrochemical micromachining

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent innovations in the area of electrochemical micromachining (μECM) have created a unique opportunity for fabricating microproducts in the micron scale. A significant constraint in attaining improved machining effectiveness in μECM applications is that of achieving the correct microtool geometry for a specified workpiece profile. This study focuses on the influences of microtool dimension on machining characteristics of electrochemical microdrilling on nickel plate. During microtool fabrication, tungsten microshafts are electrochemically etched to make desired cylindrical microtools of different lengths and diameters to investigate the effects of tool dimension on electrochemical micromachining. The shape and size of the fabricated microholes, material removal rate, machining time, and taper angle formed in the fabricated microholes are considered as response factors. After machining, the shape and size of microdrilled holes are measured and compared to tool geometry. From the experiment, it is found that the material removal rate, machining time, and the size of fabricated microhole are significantly influenced by the microtool dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bhattacharyya B, Doloi B, Sridhar PS (2001) Electrochemical micro-machining: new possibilities for micro-manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 113:301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fan ZW, Hourng LW (2010) Electrochemical micro-drilling of deep holes by rotational cathode tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(5–8):555–564

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharyya B, Munda J, Malapati M (2004) Advancement in electrochemical micro-machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44:1577–1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Park BJ, Kim BH, Chu CN (2006) The effects of tool electrode size on characteristics of micro electrochemical machining. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 55(1):197–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang MH, Zhu D (2009) Fabrication of multiple electrodes and their application for micro-holes array in ECM. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kurita T, Chikamori K, Kubota S, Hattori M (2006) A study of three-dimensional shape machining with an ECμM system. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:1311–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahn SH, Ryu SH, Choi DK, Chu CN (2004) Electro-chemical micro drilling using ultra short pulses. Precis Eng 28:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ryu SH (2009) Micro fabrication by electrochemical process in citric acid electrolyte. J Mater Process Technol 209:2831–2837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang J (2006) Analytical electrochemistry, 3rd edn. Wiley, New Jersey

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Luo YF (2006) Differential equations for the ultra-fast transient migration in electrolytic dissolution. Electrochem Commun 8:353–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fan ZW, Hourng LW (2009) The analysis and investigation on the microelectrode fabrication by electrochemical machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kozak J, Gulbinowicz D, Gulbinowicz Z (2008) The mathematical modeling and computer simulation of pulse electrochemical micromachining. Eng Lett 16(4):556–561

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mithu MAH, Fantoni G, Ciampi J (2011) The effect of high frequency and duty cycle in electrochemical microdrilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55(9–12):921–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. de Silva AKM, McGeough JA (1998) Process monitoring of electrochemical micromachining. J Mater Process Technol 76:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bhattacharyya B, Malapati M, Munda J (2005) Experimental study on electrochemical micromachining. J Mater Process Technol 169:485–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mithu MAH, Fantoni G, Ciampi J (2011) A step towards the in-process monitoring for electrochemical microdrilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(9–12):969–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. A. H. Mithu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mithu, M.A.H., Fantoni, G. & Ciampi, J. How microtool dimension influences electrochemical micromachining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70, 1303–1312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5346-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5346-6

Keywords

Navigation