Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of Kaizen on safety in modular home manufacturing

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High injury and fatality rates prevalent in all types of construction in the USA may be addressed by combining safety initiatives with process improvement through Lean. This study evaluated the impact on worker safety when Kaizen (a Lean tool) was used at a modular homebuilder. Twelve students who had completed a safety course and four safety experts rated the probability and severity of hazards (as determined by a job safety analysis, or JSA) present in three workstations; base-framing, sheet rock hanging, and painting. These ratings were provided after viewing a series of photographs taken before and after a Kaizen event performed at each workstation. The rating tool showed high reliability for all safety experts' ratings but only for students' ratings from the sheet rock hanging station. Students' and experts' ratings showed a significant reduction in risk in the base-framing station after the Kaizen, and student's ratings showed significantly reduced risk in the sheet-rock hanging station. Kaizen has the potential to improve safety in modular homebuilding and possibly, other manufacturing and construction activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2012) Number and rate of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses by selected industry. Available from: http://www.bls.gov/iif/oshsum.htm. Accessed 21 Jun 2012.

  2. Kumar M, Antony J, Singh RK, Tiwari MK, Perry D (2006) Implementing the Lean Sigma framework in an Indian SME: a case study. Prod Plan Control 17(4):407–423. doi:10.1080/09537280500483350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ikuma LH, Nahmens I, James J (2011) Use of safety and lean integrated kaizen to improve performance in modular homebuilding. J Constr Eng Management 137(7):551–560. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Nahmens I, Ikuma L (2009) An empirical examination of the relationship between lean construction and safety in the industrial housing industry. Lean Constr J pp1-12. Available from: http://www.leanconstruction.org/lcj/paper.html

  5. Ballard B, Howell G (1998) Implementing lean construction: Understanding and action. Proceedings IGLC. Guaruja Brazil

  6. Womack JP, Jones D (1996) Beyond Toyota: how to root out waste and pursue perfection. Harvard Bus Rev 74(5):140–158

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ohno T (1988) Toyota production system: beyond large-scale production. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ballard G, Howell G (1994) Implementing lean construction: Stabilizing work flow. Proceedings IGLC. Santiago, Chile

  9. Hook M, Stehn L (2008) Lean principles in industrialized housing production:the need for a cultural change. Lean Constr J 20–35. Available from: http://www.leanconstruction.org/lcj/paper.html

  10. Landsbergis PA, Cahill J, Schnall P (1999) The impact of lean production and related new systems of work organization on worker health. J Occup Health Psychol 4(2):108–130. doi:10.1037/1076-8998.4.2.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Womack S, Armstrong T, Liker J (2009) Lean job design and musculoskeletal disorder risk: A two plant comparison. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf 9(4):279–293. doi:10.1002/hfm.20159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wong YC, Wong KY, Ali A (2009) A study on lean manufacturing implementation in the Malaysian electrical and electronics industry. Eur J Sci Res 38(4): 521–535. Available from: http://www.europeanjournalofscientificresearch.com/

  13. Saurin T, Ferreira C (2009) The impacts of lean production on working conditions: a case study of a harvester assembly line in Brazil. Int J Industrial Ergon 39:403–412. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Reniers G, Dullaertb W, Alec B, Soudana K (2005) The use of current risk analysis tools evaluated towards preventing external domino accidents. J Loss Prev Process Ind 18:119–126. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2005.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rozenfeld O, Sacks R, Rosenfeld Y, Baum H (2010) Construction job safety analysis. Saf Sci 48:491–498. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Friend MA, Kohn JP (2010) Fundamentals of occupational safety and health, 5th edn. Government Institutes, Scarecrow Press, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marhavilas PK, Koulouriotis D (2008) A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data: Application in an aluminum extrusion industry. J Loss Prev Process Ind 21:596–603. doi:10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brunet AP, New S (2003) Kaizen in Japan: an empirical study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(12):1426–1446. doi:10.1108/01443570310506704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Team PPD (2002) Kaizen for the shop floor. Productivity Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Farris JA, Van Aiken EM, Doolen TL, Worley J (2008) Learning from less successful kaizen events: a case study. Eng Management J 20(3):10–20

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leonard D (2010) Quality management practices in the US homebuilding industry. TQM J 22(1):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shang G, Pheng LS (2013) Understanding the application of Kaizen methods in construction firms in China. J Tech Manag China 8(1):18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Yu H, Al-Hussein M, Al-Jibouri S, Telyas A (2013) Lean transformation in a modular building company: a case for implementation. J Management Eng (ASCE) 29(1):103–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Carlson D (1991) Automated builder: dictionary/encyclopedia of industrialized housing. CMN Associates, Carpinteria, CA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL (1979) Interclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 86(2):420–428. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.86.2.420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chicchetti DV, Sparrow SA (1981) Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: application to assessment of adaptive behavior. American J Ment Defic 86:127–137

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nahmens I, Ikuma LH (2012) Effects of lean on sustainability of modular homebuilding. ASCE J Archit Eng 18(2):155–163. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman JN, Crowe J, Postma J, Ybarra V, Keiffer MC (2009) Perceptions of environmental and occupational health hazards among agricultural workers in Washington state. Am Assoc Occup Health Nurses (AAOHN) J 57(9):359–371. doi:10.3928/08910162-20090817-01

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lombardi DA, Verma SK, Brennan MJ, Perry MJ (2009) Factors influencing worker use of personal protective eyewear. Accid Anal Prev 41:755–762. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.03.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laura H. Ikuma.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

James, J., Ikuma, L.H., Nahmens, I. et al. The impact of Kaizen on safety in modular home manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70, 725–734 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5315-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5315-0

Keywords

Navigation