Skip to main content
Log in

A semi-automatic mold cost estimation framework based upon geometry similarity

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The automation of cost estimation for manufacturing processes is a challenging task in computer-aided manufacturing. In this paper, we introduce a two-step analogy and mathematical approach to estimate the cost of injection molding. In the analogy step, data of molds are partitioned into homogeneous groups based on mold type and mold design. In the prediction step, regression models based upon geometry, topology, and other inherent shape properties are constructed within each group. The variables in the regression models within each group are extracted automatically from one orthographic two-dimensional (2D) image of the injection-molded part. Mean and variance estimates are calculated on a subset of relevant molds so that the risk of an inaccurate bid can be assessed on a subset of relevant molds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. El-Mehalawi M (1999) A geometric similarity case-based reasoning system for cost estimation in net-shape manufacturing. Ohio State University

  2. Kwong DCK, Smith GF (1998) A computational system for process design of injection moulding: combining blackboard-based expert system and case-based reasoning approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(4):239–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong TS (1998) Evaluation of a software package to estimate cost of an injection mold. University of Massachusetts, Lowell

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wang H, Ruan X-Y, Zhou XH (2003) Research on injection mould intelligent cost estimation system and key technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21(3):215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergmann R, Althoff K-D, Breen S, Göker M, Manago M, Traphöner R, Wess S (2004) Developing industrial case-based reasoning applications: the INRECA methodology. Springer, Berlin

  6. Shehab E, Abdalla H (2002) An intelligent knowledge-based system for product cost modelling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Nagahanumaiah K, Mukherjee NP, Ravi B (2005) An integrated framework for die and mold cost estimation using design features and tooling parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(9–10):1138–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Raviwongse R, Allada V (1997) Artificial neural network based model for computation of injection mould complexity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(8):577–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shehab EM, Abdalla HS (2002) A design to cost system for innovative product development. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 216(7):999–1019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chan SF, Law CK, Chan KK (2003) Computerised price quoting system for injection mould manufacture. J Mater Process Technol 139(1–3):212–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sapene C (2007) Cost analysis of plastic injection molds. Lulu.com

  12. Latecki L, Lakamper R (2000) Shape similarity measure based on correspondence of visual parts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 22(10):1185–1190

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tangelder JWH, Veltkamp RC (2004) A survey of content based 3D shape retrieval methods. In: Shape Modeling Applications, 2004. Proceedings, pp. 145–156

  14. Lou K, Ramani K, Prabhakar S (2004) Content-based three-dimensional engineering shape search. In: 20th International Conference on Data Engineering, 2004. Proceedings, pp. 754–765

  15. Belongie S, Malik J, Puzicha J (2002) Shape matching and object recognition using shape contexts. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 24(4):509–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loncaric S (1998) A survey of shape analysis techniques. Pattern Recogn 31(8):983–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iyer N, Jayanti S, Lou K, Kalyanaraman Y, Ramani K (2005) Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends. Computer Aided Des 37(5):509–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cardone A, Gupta RK, Karnik M (2003) A survey of shape similarity assessment algorithms for product design and manufacturing applications. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 3:109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bustos B, Keim DA, Saupe D, Schreck T, Vranić DV (2005) Feature-based similarity search in 3D object databases. ACM Comput Surv 37(4):345–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker JS (1999) A primer on wavelets and their scientific applications. CRC, Boca Raton

  21. Matthews I, Xiao J, Baker S (2007) 2D vs. 3D deformable face models: representational power, construction, and real-time fitting. Int J Comput Vis 75(1):93–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kluz J, D. & P. M. A. National Tool, and National Tooling and Machining Association (U.S.) (1981) Moldmaking & die cast dies for metalworking trainees: machine tool operators, machinists, toolmakers, diemakers, moldmakers, special machine builders. National Tooling & Machining Association, Washington

  23. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, Eddins SL (2004) Digital image processing using MATLAB. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cyrus Hillsman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hillsman, C., Wang, Y. & Nazzal, D. A semi-automatic mold cost estimation framework based upon geometry similarity. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68, 1387–1399 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4929-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4929-6

Keywords

Navigation