Skip to main content

A novel approach for supporting the development cycle of automation systems

Abstract

The growing complexity of current automation applications demand clear methodologies and procedures in order to assure that the system under design meets the requirements. Within the industrial automation field there are several methods, techniques, tools and standards that have captured the experience of designers through years of practice. On the other hand, the software engineering discipline offers different methodologies covering the different phases of the life cycle (analysis, design, test and maintenance). This work pretends to take advantage of both: the maturity of the software engineering discipline and the well-spread methods and standards of the industrial automation field. In particular, the proposed methodological approach uses model based engineering principles for developing automation control systems combining modeling methods of automation field. Specifically, it combines GEMMA (Guide d'Étude des Modes de Marches et d'Arrêts), UML (Unified Modeling Language) use case diagrams and GRAFCET (GRAphe Fonctionnel de Commande, Etapes, Transitions) for assisting the designer during the analysis, design and coding phases. Using GEMMA, the states of the automated process are identified. Use case diagrams allow identifying the actors that participate in the operation modes. Finally, a set of GRAFCET templates assists in the design of use cases. Thus, the user is guided through the development phases in which the concepts used are familiar to him/her. The final step includes the automatic generation of the Program Organization Units (POUs) in PLCopen XML interface. The proposed methodology is illustrated by means of a simple but illustrative mechatronic case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. IEC International Standard IEC 61131–3 (2003) Programmable Controllers, Part 3: Programming Languages”. International Electrotechnical Commission

  2. John KH, Tiegelkamp M (2001) Programming industrial automation systems. Berlin:Springer

  3. PLCopen (1992). Available at: http://www.plcopen.org. Accessed 25 July 2012

  4. Kandare G, Strmcnik S, Godena G (2010) Domain specific model-based development of software for programmable logic controllers. Comput Ind 61:419–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt D (2006) Model driven engineering. IEEE Computer Society 39:25–31

    Google Scholar 

  6. Selic B (2010) The pragmatics of model-driven development. IEEE Softw 20(5):19–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Streitferdt D, Wendt G, Nenninger P, Nyßen A, Lichter H (2008) Model driven development challenges in the automation domain. Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference. Turku, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  8. OMG (2003) MDA Guide Version 1.0.1. Available at: http://www.omg.org/news/whitepapers/index.htm#MDA. Accessed 25 July 2012

  9. Panjaitan S, Frey G (2007) Operation modes handling in distributed automation systems. Proc. of the 1st IFAC Workshop on Dependable Control of Discrete Systems (DCDS'07), Cachan (France), June 13–15

    Google Scholar 

  10. Booch G, Rumbaugh J, Jacobson I (2005) The Unified Modeling Language user guide. Addison-Wesley Educational Publishers

  11. Panjaitan S, Frey G (2007) Development process for distributed automation systems combining UML and IEC 61499. Int J Manuf Res 2(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. AFCET (1977) Normalisation de la Représentation du Cahier des Charges d'un Automatisme Logique. Technical report, AFCET Commission

  13. ADEPA (1981) GEMMA (Guide d'Étude des Modes de Marches et d'Arrêts). Agence nationale pour le DEveloppment de la Production Automatisée

  14. Ponsa P, Vilanova R (2005) Automatización de procesos mediante la guía GEMMA. Edicions UPC (in Spanish)

  15. Ponsa P, Vilanova R, Díaz M, Gomŕ A (2007) Application of a guideline for design improvement in supervisory control. Int J Hum Comput Interact 1:21–36

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ponsa P, Vilanova R, Amante B (2011) Human intervention and interface design in automation systems. Int J Comput Comm Contr 6(1):166–174

    Google Scholar 

  17. González VM, Mateos F, Ng A (2004) MLAV: the object-oriented methodology of the Virtual Automation Lab. Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2004), New Orleans, LA, USA, pp 5153–5158

    Google Scholar 

  18. Machado J, Seabra E (2010) A systematized approach to obtain dependable controllers specifications. ABCM Symp Series Mechatronics 4:408–417

    Google Scholar 

  19. IEC 60848 (2002) GRAFCET specification language for sequential function charts. International Electrotechnical Commission

  20. Estévez E, Marcos M, Gangoiti U (2005) A tool integration framework for industrial distributed control systems. Proc. of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp 8373–8378

  21. Beremiz (2007). Available at: http://www.beremiz.org. Accessed 25 July 2012

  22. Hästbacka D, Vepsäläinena T, Kuikka S (2011) Model-driven development of industrial process control applications. J Syst Softw 84(7):1100–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Tranoris C, Thramboulidis K (2006) A tool supported engineering process for developing control applications. Comput Ind 57(5):462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thramboulidis K, Perdikis D, Kantas S (2007) Model driven development of distributed control applications. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 33(3–4):233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Vyatkin V, Hanisch HM, Pang C, Yang CH (2009) Closed-loop modeling in future automation system engineering and validation. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 39(1):17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chiron F, Kouiss K (2007) Design of IEC 61131–3 function blocks using SysML. Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  27. Thramboulidis K, Frey G (2011) Towards a model-driven IEC 61131-based development process in industrial automation. J Softw Eng Appl 4:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Reinhartz-Berger I, Sturm A (2009) Utilizing domain models for application design and validation. Inform Software Tech 51(8):1275–1289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Estévez E, MarcosM (2008) Model-driven design of industrial control systems. Proc. of IEEE Multi-Conference on Systems and Control, 9th IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Aided Control System Design (CACSD), pp1253–1258

  30. Estévez E, Marcos M, Orive D (2007) Automatic generation of PLC automation projects from component-based models. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 35(6):527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lüder A, Estévez E, Hundt L, Marcos M (2010) Automatic transformation of logic models within engineering of embedded mechatronical units. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 54(9–12):1077–1089

    Google Scholar 

  32. IEC (1988) Preparation of Function Charts for Control Systems. No 848. Technical report. International Electrotechnical Commission

  33. SFCEdit (2012) Available at: http://stephane.dimeglio.free.fr/. Accessed 25 July 2012

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. L. Alvarez or A. Burgos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alvarez, M.L., Estévez, E., Sarachaga, I. et al. A novel approach for supporting the development cycle of automation systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 68, 711–725 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4793-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-4793-4

Keywords

  • Industrial automation systems
  • Design methodology
  • GEMMA
  • GRAFCET
  • PLCopen