Abstract
In this paper, a heuristic threshold policy is developed to detect and classify the states of a multivariate quality control system. In this approach, a probability measure called belief is first assigned to the quality characteristics and then the posterior belief of out-of-control characteristics is updated by taking new observations and using a Bayesian rule. If the posterior belief is more than a decision threshold, called minimum acceptable belief determined using a heuristic threshold policy, then the corresponding quality characteristic is classified out-of-control. Besides using a different approach, the main difference between the current research and previous works is that the current work develops a novel heuristic threshold policy, in which in order to save sampling cost and time or when these factors are constrained, the number of the data gathering stages is assumed limited. A numerical example along with some simulation experiments is given at the end to demonstrate the application of the proposed methodology and to evaluate its performances in different scenarios of mean shifts.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
References
Williams JD, Woodall WH, Birch JB, Sullivan JH (2006) Distribution of Hotelling’s T 2 statistic based on the successive differences estimator. J Qual Technol 38:217–229
Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2005) Fault diagnosis in multivariate control charts using artificial neural networks. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21:825–840
Niaki STA, Ostadsharif-Memar A (2009) A new statistical process control method to monitor and diagnose bivariate normal mean vectors and covariance matrices simultaneously. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 43:964–981
Kuo Y (2006) Optimal adaptive control policy for joint machine maintenance and product quality control. Eur J Oper Res 171:586–597
Fallahnezhad MS, Niaki STA (2009) A Bayesian inference and stochastic dynamic programming approach to determine the best binomial distribution. Commun Stat Theory Methods 38:2379–2397
Eshragh-J A, Modarres M (2001) A new approach to distribution fitting: decision on beliefs. Proceedings of the 53rd ISI Session, Seoul, Korea.
Monfared MAS, Ranaiefar F (2007) Further analysis and developments of the Eshragh–Modarres (E–M) algorithm on statistical estimation. Scientia Iranica 14:425–434
Fallahnezhad MS, Niaki STA (2011) A multi-stage two-machines replacement strategy using mixture models, Bayesian inference and stochastic dynamic programming. Commun Stat Theory Methods 40:702–725
Niaki STA, Fallahnezhad MS (2009) Designing an optimum acceptance plan using Bayesian inference and stochastic dynamic programming. Scientia Iranica 16:19–25
Fallahnezhad MS, Niaki STA, Eshragh-Jahromi AH (2007) A one-stage two-achines replacement strategy based on the Bayesian inference method. J Ind Syst Eng 1:235–250
Makis V (2009) Multivariate Bayesian process control for a finite production run. Eur J Oper Res 194:795–806
Niaki STA, Fallahnezhad MS (2009) A new control chart to monitor mean-shifts of bi-variate quality control processes. Iran J Oper Res 1:85–95
Niaki STA, Fallahnezhad MS (2009) Decision-making in detecting and diagnosing faults in multivariate statistical quality control environments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:713–724
Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (1992) A multivariate EWMA control chart. Technometrics 34:46–53
Fasso A (1999) One-sided MEWMA control charts. Commun Stat Theory Methods 28:381–401
Yeh AB, Lin DKJ, Zhou H, Venkataramani C (2003) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart for monitoring process variability. J Appl Stat 30:507–536
Pignatiello JJ, Runger GC (1990) Comparisons of multivariate CUSUM charts. J Qual Technol 22:173–186
Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2007) Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23:517–543
Mason RL, Tracy ND, Young JC (1995) Decomposition of T 2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. J Qual Technol 27:99–108
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Conditional mean and variance of the variables
Conditional mean of variables gr and sm can be evaluated using the following equation.
Where,
- Σ :
-
The covariance matrix of the process
- Σ xx :
-
Submatrix of the covariance matrix Σ for variables j = gr, sm
- Σ xX :
-
Submatrix of the covariance matrix Σ between variables j = gr, sm and j ≠ gr, sm
- Σ XX :
-
Submatrix of the covariance matrix Σ for variables j ≠ gr, sm
Further, the conditional covariance matrix of variables j = gr, sm on variables j ≠ gr, sm is obtained as \( {{\varvec{\varSigma}}_{{\bf xx}}}-\varvec{\varSigma}_{{\bf xX}}^{{\bf T}}\varvec{\varSigma}_{{\bf XX}}^{{-{\bf 1}}}{{\varvec{\varSigma}}_{{\bf xX}}} \).
Appendix 2: Evaluating the optimal value of d gr,sm(k)
Assume \( {{\left( {\mu_j } \right)}_{{j\in \left\{ {1,2, \ldots, m} \right\}}}}=0 \) and \( {{\left( {\sigma_j } \right)}_{{j\in \left\{ {1,2, \ldots, m} \right\}}}}=1 \). Then,
Now since (T k , sm ,T k,gr| sm) follow a standard normal distribution \( {{\left( {\mu_j } \right)}_{{j\in \left\{ {\mathrm{gr}\text{,}\mathrm{sm}} \right\}}}}=0 \) and \( {{\left( {\sigma_j } \right)}_{{j\in \left\{ {\mathrm{gr}\text{,}\mathrm{sm}} \right\}}}}=1 \), hence (T k,gr| sm)2 and (T k ,sm)2 follow a χ 2 distribution with one degree of freedom. Then, if we assume that (T k,sm)2 is approximately equal to its mean, we have
Thus,
Now, since \( {{\left( {{T_{{k,\left. {\mathrm{gr}} \right|\mathrm{sm}}}}} \right)}^2}\propto {\chi^2}(1) \), we have
Hence,
Similarly
Replacing the above equations in Eq. () results in
Now by solving the equation \( \frac{{\delta {V_{i,j }}(N)}}{{\delta {d_{\mathrm{gr}\text{,}\mathrm{sm}}}(k)}}=0 \), the following equation is obtained.
Finally, the optimal value of d gr,sm(k) is determined by solving this equation numerically or by a search algorithm.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nezhad, M.S.F., Niaki, S.T.A. A heuristic threshold policy for fault detection and diagnosis in multivariate statistical quality control environments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 1231–1243 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4561-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4561-x