Skip to main content

An agent-based modeling approach to analyze the impact of warehouse congestion on cost and performance

Abstract

This article discusses a novel agent-based modeling (ABM) approach to analyze the impact of warehouse congestion and presents results indicating the significant effect of congestion on cost and performance in various scenarios. In particular, the simulation represents the behaviors of the order pickers in a picker-to-part, low picking warehouse and focuses on representing the traffic and movements of the pickers. The key motivation for simulating this system is the lack of literature discussing models or simulations capable of representing the congestion component of order pickers, a component important in actual warehouse operations. The conceptual model of the simulation is described and justified using the Conceptual Model for Simulation Diagram™ and the simulation is constructed using the simulation software AnyLogic®. The simulation is operationally validated via a series of experiments performed to test the simulation’s results against the expected dynamics of the system as described in (Tompkins et al. 2003). After operationally validating the simulation, key results are discussed and it is shown that the ABM simulation paradigm is capable of quantitatively capturing new and traditionally difficult to explore dynamics in warehouse operations, including components of congestion not considered in literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. 1.

    Bazzan ALC, Klugl F (2005) Case studies on the Braess Paradox: simulating route recommendation and learning in abstract and microscopic models. Transp Res C 13:299–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    de Koster R, Le-Duc T, Roodbergen KJ (2007) Design and control of warehouse order picking: a literature review. Eur J Oper Res 182:481–501

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gue KR, Meller RD, Skufca JD (2006) The effects of pick density on order picking areas with narrow aisles. IIE Trans 38:859–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Harel D (1988) On visual formalisms. Commun ACM 31(5):514–530

    MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Harel D (1987) Statecharts: a visual formalism for complex systems. Sci Comput Program 8(3):231–274

    MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Heath BL (2006) Developing engineered standards for powered trucks. Thesis, Kettering University

  7. 7.

    Heath BL (2010) The history, philosophy, and practice of agent-based modeling and the development of the conceptual model for simulation diagram. Dissertation, Wright State University

  8. 8.

    Hsieh L, Tsai L (2006) The optimum design of a warehouse system on order picking efficiency. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 28:262–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Hwang HS, Cho GS (2006) A performance evaluation model for order picking warehouse design. Comput Ind Eng 51:335–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Pan JC, Shih P (2008) Evaluation of the throughput of a multiple-picker order picking system with congestion consideration. Comput Ind Eng 55:379–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Parikh PJ, Meller RD (2009) Estimating picker blocking in wide-aisle order picking systems. IIE Trans 41:232–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Parikh PJ, Meller RD (2008) Selecting between batch and zone order picking strategies in a distribution center. Transp Res E 44:696–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Peeta S, Zhang P, Zhou W (2005) Behavior-based analysis of freeway car–truck interactions and related mitigation strategies. Transp Res B 39:417–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Petersen CG, Aase G (2004) A comparison of picking, storage, and routing policies in manual order picking. Int J Prod Econ 92:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Roodbergen KJ, Koster RD (2001) Routing order pickers in a warehouse with a middle aisle. Eur J Oper Res 133:32–43

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Rouwenhorst B, Reuter B, Stockrahm V, Mantel G, Zijm WHM (2000) Warehouse design and control: framework and literature review. Eur J Oper Res 122:515–533

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Takama T, Preston J (2008) Forecasting the effects of road user charge by stochastic agent-based modelling. Transp Res A 42:738–749

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tompkins JA, White JA, Bozer YA, Tanchoco JMA (2003) Facilities planning. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian L. Heath.

Additional information

Article note

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the US Air Force, the Department of Defense, or the US Government. No endorsement intended.

Appendix

Appendix

The CM4S Diagram for this simulation is available for download at http://www.cecs.wright.edu/~fciarall/IJAMT/Heath_Ciarallo_Hill_IJAMT_Appendices.pdf

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Heath, B.L., Ciarallo, F.W. & Hill, R.R. An agent-based modeling approach to analyze the impact of warehouse congestion on cost and performance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 563–574 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4505-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Agent-based modeling
  • Distribution center
  • Warehouse
  • Congestion
  • Simulation