Abstract
Surface quality is a very important factor to be considered in determining part build orientation in rapid prototyping (RP) processes. Previous research has shown that parts built with inclined planes or curved surfaces along the build orientation have large staircase effect, thus have higher surface roughness compared to parts built with only vertical surfaces. However, as layers are getting thinner in rapid prototyping processes, the opposite might be true. In this study, a number of experiments and measurements are conducted first. In a single machine setup, two cylinders are built, one along axial direction and the other along transverse direction using an Objet® machine. Measurements have shown that surface roughness of RP parts built along the transverse direction is better than those from the axial direction. Through analysis and observation, the authors can conclude that when layers are small enough, surface curvature or slope along the build orientation may no longer be a major concern for RP part surface quality. Instead, the authors have observed that on-the-layer contour layout may cause even more serious surface quality problem. In other words, surface quality is not only dependent on build orientation, but more on scanning orientation on layers.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Gibson I, Rosen DW, Stucker B (2010) Additive manufacturing technologies: rapid prototyping to direct digital manufacturing. Springer, New York
Cheng W, Fuh JYH, Nee AYC, Wong YS, Loh HT, Miyazawa T (1995) Multi-objective optimization of part building orientation in stereolithography. Rapid Prototyping J 1(4):12–23
Fadel GM, Kirschman C (1996) Accuracy issues in CAD to RP translation. Rapid Prototyping J 2(2):4–17
Reeves PE, Cobb RC (1997) Reducing the surface deviation of stereolithography using in-process techniques. Rapid Prototyping J 3(1):20–31
Hur J, Lee K (1998) The development of a CAD environment to determine the preferred build-up direction for layered manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 14(4):247–254
Pham DT, Dimov DT, Gault RS (1999) Part orientation in stereo-lithography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(9):674–682
Xu F, Loh HT, Wong YS (1999) Considerations and selection of optimal orientation for different rapid prototyping systems. Rapid Prototyping J 5(2):54–60
Campbell RI, Artorelli M, Lee HS (2002) Surface roughness visualization for rapid prototyping models. Comput Aided Des 34:717–725
Kulkarni P, Marsan A, Dutta D (2000) A review of process planning techniques in layered manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping J 6(1):18–35
Byun HS, Lee KH (2006) Determination of the optimal build direction for different rapid prototyping processes using multi-criterion decision making. Robot Comput Integrated Manuf 22:69–80
Ahn DK, Kim HC, Lee SH (2007) Fabrication direction optimization to minimize post-machining in layered manufacturing. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47(3–4):593–606
Galantucci LM, Lavecchia F, Percoco G (2009) Experimental study aiming to enhance the surface finish of fused deposition modeled parts. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:189–192
Canellidis V, Giannatsis J, Dedoussis V (2009) Genetic-algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of the build orientation in stereolithography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:714–730
Objet Geometries. http://www.objet.com/. Accessed in December 2011
3D Systems. http://www.3dsystems.com/. Accessed in December 2011
Chen YH, Chen ZZ (2011) Joint analysis in rapid fabrication of non-assembly mechanisms. Rapid Prototyping J 17(6):408–417
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, Y., Lu, J. RP part surface quality versus build orientation: when the layers are getting thinner. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 377–385 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4491-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4491-7