Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation-based optimization of ecological leasing: a step toward extended producer responsibility (EPR)

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, due to severe environmental legislations and extended producer responsibility, leasing has been recommended as a strategy for increasing resources productivity and minimizing waste generation during consumption and product end-of-life (EOL) phase. Hence, it is essential to develop a model that can help leasing company for achieving sustainable production management. In this paper, a model is developed which optimizes the environmental and economical impact of product during leasing and its EOL phase from customers and leasing company point of view. To solve the problem, simulation-based optimization approach is investigated and the integrated mathematical and simulation model is developed for incorporating uncertainty during leasing period. Finally a case study with data from industry is used to validate the approach and potential applications of the developed model are illustrated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fishbein BK, McGarry LS, Dillon PS (2000) Leasing: a step toward producer responsibility. INFORM, New York

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mont OK (2002) Clarifying the concept of product-service system. J Clean Prod 10:237–245. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00039-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Robert KH, SchimdtBleek B, deLarderel JA, Basile G, Jansen JL, Kuehr R (2002) Strategic sustainable development—selection, design and synergies of applied tools. J Clean Prod 10:197–214. doi:10.1016/S0959-6526(01)00061-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Stahel WR (1997) The function economy: cultural and organizational change. In: Richards DJ (ed) The industrial green game, implications for environmental design and management. National Academy Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mont O (2000) Product-service systems. The International Institute of Industrial Environmental Economics. Lund University, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency

  6. Aras N, Güllü R, Yürülmez S (2011) Optimal inventory and pricing policies for remanufacturable leased products. Int J Product Econ 133(1):262–271. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.01.024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Steers K (2004) Hardware tips: complete PC preventive maintenance guide. http://www.pcworld.com/article/116583/hardware_tips_complete_pc_preventive_maintenance_guide.html. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  8. Pongpech J, Murthy DNP, Boondiskulchock R (2006) Maintenance strategies for used equipment under lease. J Qual Maint Eng 12(1):52–67. doi:10.1108/13552510610654538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chien YH (2005) Determining optimal warranty periods from the seller’s perspective and optimal out-of-warranty replacement age from the buyer's perspective. Int J Syst Sci 36:631–637. doi:10.1080/00207720500219054

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Erkoyuncu JA, Roy R, Shehab E, Cheruvu K (2011) Understanding service uncertainties in industrial product–service system cost estimation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:1223–1238. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2767-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clark TM (1978) Leasing. McGraw-Hill, London

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mangun DC, Thurston DL (2002) Incorporating component reuse, remanufacture, and recycle into product portfolio design. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49:479–490. doi:10.1109/TEM.2002.807292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thurston DL, Delatorre JP (2007) Leasing and extended producer responsibility for personal computer component reuse. Int J Environ Pollut 29:104–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao Y, Pandey V, Kim H, Thurston D (2010) Varying lifecycle lengths within a product take-back portfolio. J Mech Des 132:1–10. doi:10.1115/1.4002142

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma M (2004) Reverse logistics and environmental considerations in equipment leasing and asset management. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology

  16. Kuo T (2011) Simulation of purchase or rental decision-making based on product service system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52:1239–1249. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2768-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hanafiah, Chen LY, Narita H, Fujimoto H (2003) Remanufacturing in developing countries concentrated at leasing or selling—a case study of Indonesia. Proceedings Third International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and inverse Manufacturing, Tokyo

  18. Subramanian R, Guptay S, Talbot B (2005) Remanufacturable product design and contracts under extended producer responsibility, working paper

  19. Intlekofer K, Bras B, Ferguson M (2010) Energy implications of product leasing. Environ Sci Technol 44:4409–4415. doi:10.1021/es9036836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Azadivar F (1999) Simulation optimization methodologies. Proceedings of the 1999 Winter Simulation Conference, Arizona

  21. Carson Y, Maria A (1997) Simulation optimization: methods and applications. Proceedings of the 1997 Winter Simulation Conference, Atlanta

  22. Rockwell Automation Technologies, Inc. (2011) http://www.Arenasimulation.com. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  23. Kleijnen JPC, Wan J (2007) Optimization of simulated systems: OptQuest and alternatives. Simul Model Pract Theory 15:354–362. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2006.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jun HB, Cusin M, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P (2007) A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study. Int J Prod Res 45:4573–4594. doi:10.1080/00207540701440071

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Itiran (2011) Iran information technology data. http://www.itiran.com/?type=article&id=13822. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  26. Dell sustainability report fiscal year 2007 in review (2007) http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/corporate/environ/report07.pdf. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  27. Environmental Vision of Sony (2000) http://www.sony.net/SonyInfo/News/Press_Archive/200010/00-1006E/. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  28. Choi B-C, Shin H-S, Hur T (2006) Life cycle assessment of a personal computer and its effective recycling rate. Int J Life Cycle Assess 11(2):122–128. doi:10.1065/lca2004.12.196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Iranrahjoo (2011) Service provider for Sony notebook. www.iranrahjoo.com. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  30. Simapro (2011) Software for environmental assessment. www.pre.nl/simapro. Accessed 1 Aug 2011

  31. Lu LT, Wernick IK, Hsiao TY, Yu YH, Yang YM, Ma HW (2006) Balancing the life cycle impacts of notebook computers: Taiwan’s experience. Resour Conserv Recycl 48:13–25. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Dehghanian F, Mansour S (2009) Designing sustainable recovery network of end-of-life products using genetic algorithm. Resour Conserv Recycl 53:559–570. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Agrawal V, Ferguson M, Thomas V (2009) Is leasing greener than selling? Working Paper, Georgia Institute of Technology College of Management

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seed Mansour.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shokohyar, S., Mansour, S. & Karimi, B. Simulation-based optimization of ecological leasing: a step toward extended producer responsibility (EPR). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66, 159–169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4315-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4315-9

Keywords

Navigation