Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of inclination angles on geometrical features of machined surface in five-axis milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of manufacturing technology, five-axis milling has been one of the most important solution strategies in machining field. To deepen the understanding of multi-axis processing and improve the application level of the technology, the current work was carried out. This paper investigated the effects of tilt and lead angle on the scallop height, surface roughness, surface topography, and surface damages in five-axis ball-end milling process. Both geometrical analysis and experiment research are conducted to investigate the scallop height after five-axis milling, and variation of the surface roughness and surface topography with tool inclination angle obtained from the experiments was analyzed. Surface damages under the different inclination angles were also observed and analyzed with optical profiler. Several conclusions are made as follows. The inclination angles of the ball-end mill have no effect on the scallop height when only the spherical part of the cutter participates in the cutting process according to the geometrical analysis. Surface roughness with regard to tilt angles presents symmetrical characteristic around 0°. Surface texture feature, especially the texture direction, is closely related with the tool posture. The surface concave pits, convex marks, microscopic cracks, and spot corrosions are mainly the damage forms of the machined surface. More surface blemishes appeared when small inclination angles are adopted in cutting. As a result, the recommendatory inclination angle values for inclination angle are proposed. A better understanding of the five-axis machining process would be given by the detailed analysis of generation reason of the machined surface features, and the results could provide support for process parameter optimization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhong Y, Zhou J, Chen T (2002) Determination of cutter orientation for five-axis sculptured surface machining with a filleted-end cutter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(10):735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Routara BC, Bandyopadhyay A, Sahoo P (2008) Roughness modeling and optimization in CNC end milling using response surface method: effect of workpiece material variation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(11–12):1166–1180

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dabade UA, Joshi SS, Ramakrishnan N (2003) Analysis of surface roughness and chip cross-sectional area while machining with self-propelled round inserts milling cutter. J Mater Process Tech 132(1–3):305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kyun Baek D, Jo Ko T, Sool Kim H (1997) A dynamic surface roughness model for face milling. Precis Eng 20(3):171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baek DK, Ko TJ, Kim HS (2001) Optimization of feedrate in a face milling operation using a surface roughness model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(3):451–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Korkut I, Donertas MA (2007) The influence of feed rate and cutting speed on the cutting forces, surface roughness and tool-chip contact length during face milling. Mater Design 28(1):308–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Arizmendi M, Campa FJ, Fernández J, López de Lacalle LN, Gil A, Bilbao E, Veiga F, Lamikiz A (2009) Model for surface topography prediction in peripheral milling considering tool vibration. CIRP Annals Manuf Technol 58(1):93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bilalis N, Petousis M, Antoniadis A (2008) Model for surface-roughness parameters determination in a virtual machine shop environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(11–12):1137–1147

    Google Scholar 

  9. Colak O, Kurbanoglu C, Kayacan M (2007) Milling surface roughness prediction using evolutionary programming methods. Mater Design 28(2):657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cakir M, Ensarioglu C, Demirayak I (2009) Mathematical modeling of surface roughness for evaluating the effects of cutting parameters and coating material. J Mater Process Tech 209(1):102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brecher C, Quintana G, Rudolf T, Ciurana J (2010) Use of NC kernel data for surface roughness monitoring in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53(9–12):953–962

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zain AM, Haron H, Sharif S (2010) Prediction of surface roughness in the end milling machining using artificial neural network. Expert Syst Appl 37(2):1755–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Quintana G, Garcia-Romeu ML, Ciurana J (2009) Surface roughness monitoring application based on artificial neural networks for ball-end milling operations. J Intell Manuf 22(4):607–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Toh C (2004) Surface topography analysis in high speed finish milling inclined hardened steel. Precis Eng 28(4):386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Savas V, Ozay C (2007) Analysis of the surface roughness of tangential turn-milling for machining with end milling cutter. J Mater Process Tech 186(1–3):279–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Saklakoglu IE, Kasman S (2010) Investigation of micro-milling process parameters for surface roughness and milling depth. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(5–8):567–578

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dhokia V, Kumar S, Vichare P, Newman S (2008) An intelligent approach for the prediction of surface roughness in ball-end machining of polypropylene. Robot CIM-INT Manuf 24(6):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Costes JP, Moreau V (2011) Surface roughness prediction in milling based on tool displacements. J Manuf Processes 13(2):133–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jung TS, Yang MY, Lee KJ (2005) A new approach to analysing machined surfaces by ball-end milling, part I: Formulation of characteristic lines of cut remainder. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(9–10):833–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jung TS, Yang MY, Lee KJ (2005) A new approach to analysing machined surfaces by ball-end milling, part II: Roughness prediction and experimental verification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25(9–10):841–849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gani EA, Kruth JP, Vanherck P, Lauwers B (1997) A geometrical model of the cut in five-axis milling accounting for the influence of tool orientation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 13(10):677–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bouzakis KD, Aichouh P, Efstathiou K (2003) Determination of the chip geometry, cutting force and roughness in free form surfaces finishing milling, with ball-end tools. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(5):499–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barakchi Fard MJ, Feng H-Y (2008) Effect of tool tilt angle on machining strip width in five-axis flat-end milling of free-form surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(3–4):211–222

    Google Scholar 

  24. Quinsat Y, Lavernhe S, Lartigue C (2011) Characterization of 3D surface topography in 5-axis milling. Wear 271(3–4):590–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quinsat Y, Sabourin L, Lartigue C (2008) Surface topography in ball-end milling process: description of a 3D surface roughness parameter. J Mater Process Tech 195(1–3):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Zhao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, X., Zhao, J., Dong, Y. et al. Effects of inclination angles on geometrical features of machined surface in five-axis milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65, 1721–1733 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4293-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4293-y

Keywords

Navigation