Skip to main content
Log in

An improved methodology for the experimental evaluation of tool runout in peripheral milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The modeling of cutting forces plays an important role in the progress of research and technology in most machining processes. In particular, peripheral milling is a cutting process difficult to model due to the large number of variables involved. Among these variables, tool runout affects process performance by modifying milling force patterns, shortening the tool life and machine components, and by degrading workpiece quality. In this paper, a methodology to evaluate tool runout in peripheral milling is presented. The use of a boring toolholder is proposed to make controllable changes in the tool offset that modifies tool runout. In addition, the proposed methodology has been validated by means of a piezoactuator-based system that allows tool runout compensation through controlling workpiece displacement. Experimental and simulated results presented in this paper reveal the practical applications of this methodology for researchers and engineers involved in the practice of milling and its modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Li HZ, Li XP (2005) A numerical study of the effects of cutter runout on milling process geometry based on true tooth trajectory. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:435–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kumanchik LM, Schmitz TL (2007) Improved analytical chip thickness model for milling. Precis Eng 31:317–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kline WA, DeVor RE (1983) The effect of runout on cutting geometry and forces in end milling. Int J Mach Tool D R 23:123–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang J-J, Liang SY (1996) Chip load kinematics in milling with radial cutter runout. J Eng for Industry 118:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Liu X, Cheng K, Webb D, Longstaff AP, Widiyarto MH (2004) Improved dynamic cutting force model in peripheral milling. Part II: experimental verification and prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:794–805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wan M, Zhang WH (2006) Calculations of chip thickness and cutting forces in flexible end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fu HJ, DeVor RE, Kapoor SG (1984) A mechanistic model for the prediction of the force system in face milling operations. J Eng for Industry 106:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Seethaler RJ, Yellowley I (1999) The identification of radial runout in milling operations. J Manuf Sci Eng 121:524–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sutherland JW, DeVor RE (1986) An improved method for cutting force and surface error prediction inflexible end milling systems. J Eng for Industry 108:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wan M, Zhang W, Dang J, Yang Y (2010) A unified stability prediction method for milling process with multiple delays. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Schmitz TL, Couey J, Marsh E, Mauntler N, Hughes D (2007) Runout effects in milling: surface finish, surface location error, and stability. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:841–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hekman KA, Liang SY (1997) In-process monitoring of end milling cutter runout. Mechatronics 7:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Liang SY, Wang JJJ (1994) Milling force convolution modeling for identification of cutter axis offset. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 34:1177–1190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang J-J, Zheng CM (2003) Identification of cutter offset in end milling without a prior knowledge of cutting coefficients. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43:687–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivière-Lorphèvre E, Filippi E (2009) Mechanistic cutting force model parameters evaluation in milling taking cutter radial runout into account. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:8–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang J-J, Huang C (2004) A force-model-based approach to estimating cutter axis offset in ball end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:910–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ko JH, Cho D (2005) Determination of cutting-condition-independent coefficients and runout parameters in ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26:1211–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang SY, Perry SA (1994) In-process compensation for milling cutter runout via chip load manipulation. J Eng for Industry 116:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diez Cifuentes E, Pérez García H, Guzmán Villaseñor M, Vizán Idoipe A (2010) Dynamic analysis of runout correction in milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 50:709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduardo Diez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diez, E., Perez, H., Guzman, M. et al. An improved methodology for the experimental evaluation of tool runout in peripheral milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 65, 283–293 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4168-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4168-2

Keywords

Navigation