Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To reduce the usage of grinding fluid, nanofluid has recently been applied to grinding process with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique. In this study, surface grinding of hardened AISI 52100 steel under different spraying parameters was carried out. Grinding performance was investigated and compared in terms of grinding forces, surface roughness, and grinding temperature. Experimental results show that the MQL nozzle spraying direction has important effects on the application of the nanofluid mist, and then on the lubrication and cooling of the grinding zone. It is found that an optimal grinding performance can be obtained when the nozzle is positioned angularly toward the grinding wheel. Furthermore, it is shown that air pressure and spraying distance are also critical in order to enhance the nanofluid mist to be penetrated into the grinding zone. Grinding forces, surface roughness, and grinding temperature are decreased with the increase of air pressure, and grinding performance in shorter spraying distance is better than that in longer spraying distance. The influence mechanism of the spraying parameters on the grinding performance was discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kompella S, Moylan SP, Chandrasekar S (2001) Mechanical properties of thin surface layers affected by material removal processes. Surf Coat Technol 146–147:384–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mao C, Zhou ZX, Zhang J, Huang XM, Du DY (2011) An experimental investigation of affected layers formed in grinding of AISI 52100 steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54:515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aurich JC, Herzenstiel P, Sudermann H, Magg T (2008) High-performance dry grinding using a grinding wheel with a defined grain pattern. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 57:357–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Malkin S, Guo C (2008) Grinding technology: theory and application of machining with abrasives. Industrial Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weiner K, Inasaki I, Sutherland JW, Wakabayashi T (2004) Dry machining and minimum quantity lubrication. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 53:511–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barczak LM, Batako ADL, Morgan MN (2010) A study of plane surface grinding under minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) condition. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 50:977–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Fusse RY, Catai RE, Franca TV, Aguiar PR (2007) Analysis of surface integrity for minimum quantity lubricant-MQL in grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 47:412–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silva LR, Bianchi EC, Catai RE, Fusse RY, Franca TV, Aguiar PR (2005) Study on the behavior of the minimum quantity lubricant-MQL technique under different lubricating and cooling conditions when grinding ABNT 4340 steel. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng 200:192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hafenbraedl D, Malkin S (2000) Environmentally-conscious minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) for internal cylindrical grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 28:149–154

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sanchez JA, Pombo I, Alberdi R, Izquierdo B, Ortega N, Plaza S, Toledano JM (2010) Machining evaluation of a hybid MQL-CO2 grinding technology. J Clean Prod 18:1840–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH (2010) Influence of oil mist parameters on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 50:521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tawakoli T, Hadad MJ, Sadeghi MH, Daneshi A, Stöckert S, Rasifard A (2009) An experimental investigation of the effects of workpiece and grinding parameters on minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 49:924–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Alves JAC, Fernandes UB, Junior CES, Bianchi EC, Aguiar PR (2009) Application of the minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) technique in the plunge cylindrical grinding operation. J Braz Soc Mech Sci Eng XXXI:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ding YL, Wen DS (2005) Particle migration in a flow of nanoparticle suspensions. Powder Technol 149:84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sankar N, Mathew N, Sobhan CB (2008) Molecular dynamics modeling of thermal conductivity enhancement in metal nanoparticle suspensions. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer 35:867–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wu JH, Phillips BS, Jiang W, Sanders JH, Zabinski JS, Malshe AP (2006) Bio-inspired surface engineering and tribology of MoS2 overcoated CBN-TiN composite coating. Wear 261:592–599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shen B, Shih AJ, Tung SC (2008) Application of nanofluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Tribol Trans 51:730–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shen B, Malshe AP, Kalita P, Shih AJ (2008) Performance of novel MoS2 nanoparticles based grinding fluids in minimum quantity lubrication grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 36:357–364

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sridharan U, Malkin S (2009) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) with nanofluid on grinding behavior and thermal distortion. Trans NAMRI/SME 37:629–636

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kalita P, Malshe AP, Jiang W, Shih AJ (2010) Tribological study of nano lubricant integrated soybean oil for minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) grinding. Trans NAMRI/SME 38:137–144

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee P, Nam TS, Li C, Lee SW (2010) Environmentally-friendly nano-fluid minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) meso-scale grinding process using nano-diamond particles. Proceedings of the International Conference on Manufacturing Automation, Hong Kong, pp 44–49

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ebbrell S, Woolley NH, Tridimas YD, Allanson DR, Rowe WB (2000) The effects of cutting fluid application methods on the grinding process. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 40:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Akiyama T, Shibata J, Yonetsu S (1984) Behaviour of grinding fluid in the gap of the contact area between a grinding wheel and workpiece. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Production Engineering, Tokyo, pp 52–57

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schmidt J, Boye H (2001) Influence of velocity and size of the droplets on the heat transfer in spray cooling. Chem Eng Technol 24(3):255–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. An QL, Fu YC, Xu JH, Xu HJ (2006) The cooling effects of cryogenic pneumatic mist jet impinging in grinding of titanium alloy. Key Eng Mater 305:575–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mundo C, Sommerfeld M, Tropea C (1995) Droplet-wall collisions: experimental studies of the deformation and breakup process. Int J Multiphase Flow 21(2):151–173

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Carsten B (2006) mixture formation in internal combustion engines. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kamata K, Obikawa T, Shinozuka J (2004) Analysis of mist flow in MQL grinding. Key Eng Mater 227–258:339–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cong Mao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mao, C., Zou, H., Huang, X. et al. The influence of spraying parameters on grinding performance for nanofluid minimum quantity lubrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 1791–1799 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4143-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4143-y

Keywords

Navigation