Skip to main content
Log in

Software development for prediction of the weld bead in CMT and pulsed-MAG processes

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of weld bead shapes prior to welding has been a challenge for researchers in recent years. The assurance of a weld shape with adequate penetration and dilution, good wetting angles and no undercuts leads to less repairing and reworking and thus, lower cost and time consumed. CMT is a variant of MIG/MAG welding process recently introduced in the market. Software control for bead-shape prediction helps the user to get familiar with this modern technology. In the present paper, two approaches were undertaken for software development. These were applied to CMT and pulsed-MAG welding and the results were compared. The graphical interface was built to help the user choose the welding parameters and get the representation of the weld bead profile. The two approaches used to predict the weld bead profiles are neural networks and interpolation method. The data entries for the two different methods are: welding process (CMT and MAG-pulsed), plate thickness, travel speed and wire feed speed. The output data is the complete welding profile defined by X and Y coordinates of the points on the welding profile. The neural networks were trained with different numbers of neurons, multiple layers and different networks, and welding data bases with different structures were used, in order to find the best fitting neural network. The final results for each method were checked against real profiles and it was concluded that the neural network method was more flexible and the accuracy of each methods was nearly the same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Furukawa K (2006) New CMT arc welding process—welding of steel to aluminium dissimilar metals and welding of super-thin aluminium sheets. Weld Int 20:440–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pires I, Quintino L, Amaral V, Rosado T (2010) Reduction of fume and gas emissions using innovative gas metal arc welding variants. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 50:557–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lorenzin G, Rutili G (2009) The innovative use of low heat input in welding: experiences on “cladding” and brazing using the CMT process. Weld Int 23:622–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Thao DT, Jeong JW, Kim IS, Kim JWHJ (2008) Predicting lap-joint bead geometry in GMA welding process. Arch Mater Sci Eng 32:121–124

    Google Scholar 

  5. Palani PK, Murugan N (2006) Development of mathematical models for prediction of weld bead geometry in cladding by flux cored arc welding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 30:669–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murugan N, Gunaraj V (2000) Prediction and optimization of weld bead volume for the submerged arc process—part 1. Weld J 79:286–294

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dey V, Pratihar DK, Datta GL, Jha MN, Saha TK, Bapat AV (2009) Optimization and prediction of weldment profile in bead-on-plate welding of Al-1100 plates using electron beam. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Karray FO, Silva CWD (2004) Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems Design: Theory, Tools and Applications. Addison Wesley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen K, Cook GE, Karsai G, Ramaswamy K (1990) Artificial neural networks applied to arc welding process modeling and control. IEEE Trans Ind Appl 26:824–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pal S, Samantaray A (2008) Artificial neural network modeling of weld joint strength prediction of a pulsed metal inert gas welding process using arc signals. J Mater Process Technol 202:464–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim I, Son J, Park C, Lee C, Prasad YKD (2002) A study on prediction of bead height in robotic arc welding using a neural network. J Mater Process Technol 131:229–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jeng J-Y, Mau T-F, Leu S-M (2000) Prediction of laser butt joint welding parameters using back propagation and learning vector quantization networks. J Mater Process Technol 99:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Manikya Kanti K, Srinivasa Rao P (2008) Prediction of bead geometry in pulsed GMA welding using back propagation neural network. J Mater Process Technol 200:300–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nagesh DS, Datta GL (2002) Prediction of weld bead geometry and penetration in shielded metal-arc welding using artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 123:303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sathiya P, Jinu GR, Singh N (2009) Simulation of weld bead geometry in GTA welded duplex stainless steel (DSS). Sch Res Exch 2009:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shanmugam NS, Buvanashekaran G, Sankaranarayanasamy K, Ramesh Kumar S (2010) A transient finite element simulation of the temperature and bead profiles of T-joint laser welds. Mater Des 31:4528–4542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chapman SJ (2003) Programação em MatLab para engenheiros. Cengage Learning, São Paulo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kou S (2002) Welding metallurgy. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Demuth H (2009) Neural Network Toolbox TM 6 User’ s Guide

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Quintino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meco, S., Pardal, G., Eder, A. et al. Software development for prediction of the weld bead in CMT and pulsed-MAG processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 171–178 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3990-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3990-x

Keywords

Navigation