Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Study of path loss and data transmission error of IEEE 802.15.4 compliant wireless sensors in small-scale manufacturing environments

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless sensors emerge as a promising candidate for supporting a wide range of plant floor monitoring applications in manufacturing; nevertheless, manufacturing environments are notoriously harsh for radio propagation. Usually abundant of stationary and moving objects, manufacturing environments may cause transmission errors among wireless sensors due to blocking, scattering, and multipath effects. This study aims to experimentally investigate the nature of such transmission errors due to common stationary and moving obstacles in small-scale manufacturing environments inside a machine shop and with a moving forklift, respectively. The measurement study was performed using the commonly adopted IEEE 802.15.4-based 2.4 GHz Zigbee radio. The measurements show that the occurrence of transmission errors closely depends on the received signal strength in both stationary and moving settings, and the transmission errors can be mostly avoided by controlling the transmit power to assure the received signal strength above the radio receiving sensitivity level. It is also found that electromagnetic noise due to the typical machinery has negligible effects on the transmission error.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abhay G, Tennefoss MR (2005) Radio frequency control networking: why poor reliability today hampers what could be a viable technology in the future. Technology Assessment 005-0171-01B, Echelon Corporation:1–11

  2. Miettinen J, Salemenperä P, Järvinen V, Hirvonen M (2002) Wireless operation monitoring system for polymer covered cylinders in rolling contact. Proceedings of ASME Engineering. Technology Conference on Energy. Pet Div 2:1019–1023

    Google Scholar 

  3. Krishnamurthy L, Adler R, Buonadonna P, Chhabra J, Flanigan M, Kushalnagar N, Nachman L, Yarvis M (2005) Design and deployment of industrial sensor networks: experiences from a semiconductor plant and the North Sea. Proc ACM SenSys 05:64–75

    Google Scholar 

  4. Werb J, Newman M, Berry V, Lamb S, Sexton D, Lapinski M (2005) Improved quality of service in IEEE 802.15.4 mesh networks. Proceedings of International Workshop on Wireless and Industrial Automation., pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y, Gu, F (2006) Radio channel characteristics of zigbee wireless sensors in machine shop for plant floor process monitoring. Proc. of the 2006 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC 2006), MSEC2006-21115:1–8

  6. Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y, Gu F (2007) Channel characterization and link quality assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-compliant radio for factory environments. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 3(2):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y (2009) Performance evaluation and reliable implementation of data transmission for wireless sensors on rotating mechanical structures. Struct Health Monit Int J 8(2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright PK, Dornfeld DA, Hillaire RG, Ota NK (2006) A wireless sensor for tool temperature measurement and its integration within a manufacturing system. Trans North Amer Manuf Res Inst 34:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  9. Suprock CA, Fussell BK, Hassan RZ, Jerard RB (2008) A low cost wireless tool tip vibration sensor for milling. Proc. of the 2008 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC 2008), Evanston, Illinois, USA, MSEC_ICMP2008-72492:1–10

  10. IEEE (2003) IEEE Standard 802 Part 15.4: wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks

    Google Scholar 

  11. Proakis J, Salehi M (2002) Communication systems engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rappaport TS (1989) Indoor radio communications for factories of the future. IEEE Commun Mag 27(5):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rappaport TS (1989) Characterization of UHF multipath radio channels in factory buildings. IEEE Trans Antenna Propag 37(8):1058–1069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ganesan D, Krishnamachari B, Woo A, Culler D, Estrin D, Wicker S (2002) Complex behaviour at scale: an experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Technical report CSD-TR 02-0013. University of California, Los Angeles, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lal D, Manjeshwar A, Herrmann F, Uysal-Biyikoglu E, Keshavarzian A (2003) Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of Globecom., pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  16. Reijers N, Halkes G, Langendoen K (2004) Link layer measurements in sensor networks. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems., pp 224–234

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tang L, Wang KC, Liu M, Huang Y, Gu F (2008) Multipath effect and design considerations for wireless sensors in plant floor environments. Proc. of 2008 ISFA, 2008 International Symposium on Flexible Automation, Atlanta, GA, ISFA2008U_134:1–7

  18. Goldsmith A (2005) Wireless communication. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rappaport TS (1996) Wireless communication—principles and practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jabbar MA, Rahman MA (1989) Radio frequency interference of electric motors and controls. Proc Ind Appl Soc Ann Meet 1:207–212

    Google Scholar 

  21. Staub O, Zurcher JF, Morel P, Croisier A (1997) Indoor propagation and electromagnetic pollution in an industrial plant. Proceedings of international conference on industrial electronics, control and instrumentation., pp 1198–1203

    Google Scholar 

  22. Papadakis N, Economou A, Fotinopoulou J, Constantinou P (1999) Radio propagation measurements and modeling of indoor channels at 1,800 MHz. Wirel Pers Commun 9(2):95–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaertner G, Cahill V (2004) Understanding link quality in 802.11 Mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Internet Comput 8(1):55–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sklar B (1997) Rayleigh fading channels in mobile digital communication systems part I: characterization. IEEE Commun Mag 35(7):90–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang KC, Tang L, Huang Y (2007) Wireless sensors on rotating structures: performance evaluation and radio link characterization. Proc. of the Second ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation and Characterization (ACM WiNTECH 2007), Montreal, Quebec, Canada:3–10

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Huang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tang, L., Liu, M., Wang, KC. et al. Study of path loss and data transmission error of IEEE 802.15.4 compliant wireless sensors in small-scale manufacturing environments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63, 659–669 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3928-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3928-3

Keywords

Navigation