Abstract
Wireless sensors emerge as a promising candidate for supporting a wide range of plant floor monitoring applications in manufacturing; nevertheless, manufacturing environments are notoriously harsh for radio propagation. Usually abundant of stationary and moving objects, manufacturing environments may cause transmission errors among wireless sensors due to blocking, scattering, and multipath effects. This study aims to experimentally investigate the nature of such transmission errors due to common stationary and moving obstacles in small-scale manufacturing environments inside a machine shop and with a moving forklift, respectively. The measurement study was performed using the commonly adopted IEEE 802.15.4-based 2.4 GHz Zigbee radio. The measurements show that the occurrence of transmission errors closely depends on the received signal strength in both stationary and moving settings, and the transmission errors can be mostly avoided by controlling the transmit power to assure the received signal strength above the radio receiving sensitivity level. It is also found that electromagnetic noise due to the typical machinery has negligible effects on the transmission error.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abhay G, Tennefoss MR (2005) Radio frequency control networking: why poor reliability today hampers what could be a viable technology in the future. Technology Assessment 005-0171-01B, Echelon Corporation:1–11
Miettinen J, Salemenperä P, Järvinen V, Hirvonen M (2002) Wireless operation monitoring system for polymer covered cylinders in rolling contact. Proceedings of ASME Engineering. Technology Conference on Energy. Pet Div 2:1019–1023
Krishnamurthy L, Adler R, Buonadonna P, Chhabra J, Flanigan M, Kushalnagar N, Nachman L, Yarvis M (2005) Design and deployment of industrial sensor networks: experiences from a semiconductor plant and the North Sea. Proc ACM SenSys 05:64–75
Werb J, Newman M, Berry V, Lamb S, Sexton D, Lapinski M (2005) Improved quality of service in IEEE 802.15.4 mesh networks. Proceedings of International Workshop on Wireless and Industrial Automation., pp 1–6
Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y, Gu, F (2006) Radio channel characteristics of zigbee wireless sensors in machine shop for plant floor process monitoring. Proc. of the 2006 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC 2006), MSEC2006-21115:1–8
Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y, Gu F (2007) Channel characterization and link quality assessment of IEEE 802.15.4-compliant radio for factory environments. IEEE Trans Ind Inform 3(2):99–110
Tang L, Wang KC, Huang Y (2009) Performance evaluation and reliable implementation of data transmission for wireless sensors on rotating mechanical structures. Struct Health Monit Int J 8(2):113–124
Wright PK, Dornfeld DA, Hillaire RG, Ota NK (2006) A wireless sensor for tool temperature measurement and its integration within a manufacturing system. Trans North Amer Manuf Res Inst 34:63–70
Suprock CA, Fussell BK, Hassan RZ, Jerard RB (2008) A low cost wireless tool tip vibration sensor for milling. Proc. of the 2008 ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC 2008), Evanston, Illinois, USA, MSEC_ICMP2008-72492:1–10
IEEE (2003) IEEE Standard 802 Part 15.4: wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks
Proakis J, Salehi M (2002) Communication systems engineering. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Rappaport TS (1989) Indoor radio communications for factories of the future. IEEE Commun Mag 27(5):15–24
Rappaport TS (1989) Characterization of UHF multipath radio channels in factory buildings. IEEE Trans Antenna Propag 37(8):1058–1069
Ganesan D, Krishnamachari B, Woo A, Culler D, Estrin D, Wicker S (2002) Complex behaviour at scale: an experimental study of low-power wireless sensor networks. Technical report CSD-TR 02-0013. University of California, Los Angeles, pp 1–11
Lal D, Manjeshwar A, Herrmann F, Uysal-Biyikoglu E, Keshavarzian A (2003) Measurement and characterization of link quality metrics in energy constrained wireless sensor networks. Proceedings of Globecom., pp 1–7
Reijers N, Halkes G, Langendoen K (2004) Link layer measurements in sensor networks. Proceedings of the 1st IEEE International Conference on Mobile Ad-hoc and Sensor Systems., pp 224–234
Tang L, Wang KC, Liu M, Huang Y, Gu F (2008) Multipath effect and design considerations for wireless sensors in plant floor environments. Proc. of 2008 ISFA, 2008 International Symposium on Flexible Automation, Atlanta, GA, ISFA2008U_134:1–7
Goldsmith A (2005) Wireless communication. Cambridge University Press, New York
Rappaport TS (1996) Wireless communication—principles and practice, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Jabbar MA, Rahman MA (1989) Radio frequency interference of electric motors and controls. Proc Ind Appl Soc Ann Meet 1:207–212
Staub O, Zurcher JF, Morel P, Croisier A (1997) Indoor propagation and electromagnetic pollution in an industrial plant. Proceedings of international conference on industrial electronics, control and instrumentation., pp 1198–1203
Papadakis N, Economou A, Fotinopoulou J, Constantinou P (1999) Radio propagation measurements and modeling of indoor channels at 1,800 MHz. Wirel Pers Commun 9(2):95–111
Gaertner G, Cahill V (2004) Understanding link quality in 802.11 Mobile ad hoc networks. IEEE Internet Comput 8(1):55–60
Sklar B (1997) Rayleigh fading channels in mobile digital communication systems part I: characterization. IEEE Commun Mag 35(7):90–100
Wang KC, Tang L, Huang Y (2007) Wireless sensors on rotating structures: performance evaluation and radio link characterization. Proc. of the Second ACM International Workshop on Wireless Network Testbeds, Experimental evaluation and Characterization (ACM WiNTECH 2007), Montreal, Quebec, Canada:3–10
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, L., Liu, M., Wang, KC. et al. Study of path loss and data transmission error of IEEE 802.15.4 compliant wireless sensors in small-scale manufacturing environments. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63, 659–669 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3928-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-3928-3