Skip to main content
Log in

Deformation and stress of a composite–metal assembly

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Compliant structures, e.g. automobile body panel and airplane wing box are widely used. A compliant structure consists of one or more flexible parts, and these parts share the mating features among them. Because of process-induced deformation and part-to-part variations, external forces are applied during the assembly process and the parts are deformed. As a result, the final assembly is pre-stressed and its geometrical shape may deviate from the designed shape. Therefore, the assembly variation and residual stress need to be analysed in order to evaluate the structure performance. In this study, a new approach based on response surface methodology is developed. A number of organised virtual experiments are conducted with the aid of finite element analysis and regression models are fitted to the resulting data. These regression models relate part variations to assembly variation and residual stress. Monte Carlo simulation can be conveniently done using these simple regression models. The effectiveness of this method was illustrated using a composite–metal assembly. It is shown that the method presented in this paper provides a practical and reliable solution to the analysis of compliant structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ouyang PR et al (2008) Micro-motion devices technology: the state of arts review. J Adv Manuf Technol 38(5–6):463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ouyang PR, Zhang WJ, and Gupta MM (2005) Design of a new compliant mechanical amplifier, in 2005 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference. Long Beach, CA, USA

  3. Liu SC, Hu SJ (1997) Variation simulation for deformable sheet metal assemblies using finite element methods. ASME J Manuf Sci Eng 119(3):368–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu SC, Hu SJ, Woo TC (1996) Tolerance analysis for sheet metal assemblies. ASME J Mech Des 118(1):62–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Camelio J, Hu SJ, Ceglarek D (2003) Modeling variation propagation of muti-station assembly system with compliant parts. ASME J Mech Des 125(4):673–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chase KW, Greenwood WH (1988) Design issues in mechanical tolerance analysis. Manuf Rev ASME 1(1):50–59

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dong Z, Hu W, Xue D (1994) New production cost-tolerance models for tolerance synthesis. ASME J Eng Ind 116:119–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee B et al (2007) Variation analysis of three dimensional non-rigid assemblies, in Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing. IEEE, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. p. 13–18

  9. Tonks MR, Chase KW, Smith C (2007) In: Davidson JK (ed) Predicting deformation of compliant assemblies using covariant statistical tolerance analysis, in models for computer aided tolerancing in design and manufacturing. Springer, Netherlands, pp 321–330

    Google Scholar 

  10. Montgomery DC (2009) Design and analysis of experiments, 7th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chensong Dong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dong, C., Kang, L. Deformation and stress of a composite–metal assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61, 1035–1042 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3757-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3757-9

Keywords

Navigation