Skip to main content
Log in

Application of axiomatic design, TRIZ, and mixed integer programming to develop innovative designs: a locomotive ballast arrangement case study

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we present a method incorporating axiomatic design, TRIZ, and mixed integer programming (MIP) to solve engineering design problems. Axiomatic design decomposes the problem into several mutually independent sub-problems, TRIZ generates all feasible design concepts, and MIP optimizes cost and the numerical configuration among available design options. The method is illustrated on a locomotive ballast arrangement case study. Ballast arrangement is a key process for a locomotive assembly, which determines the carrying capacity. Due to the unsophisticated technology requirements, the ballast arrangement process has received little attention. The trend of mass customization, however, demands locomotive manufacturers to provide diverse products with affordable cost and reduced time. Thus, a flexible and easy to implement ballast arrangement process design is sought. The proposed method determines what material combinations, in what quantity, and where in the limited cavities should the ballast be allocated to minimize cost. Using the case study, we demonstrate the advantages in cost reduction and time savings. The synergy of these improvements not only can enhance productivity and agility but also competitive advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jugulum R, Sefik M (1998) Building a robust manufacturing strategy. Comput Ind Eng 35(1/2):225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shirwaiker RA, Okudan GE (2008) TRIZ and axiomatic design: a review of case-studies and a proposed synergistic use. J Intell Manuf 19(1):33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Low MK, Lamvik T, Walsh K, Myklebust O (2001) Manufacturing a green service: engaging the TRIZ model of innovation. IEEE Trans Electron Packag Manuf 24(1):10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akay D, Demiray A, Kurt M (2008) Collaborative tool for solving human factors problems in the manufacturing environment: the theory of inventive problem solving technique (TRIZ) method. Int J Prod Res 46(11):2913–2925

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamashina H, Ito T, Kawada H (2002) Innovative product development process by integrating QFD and TRIZ. Int J Prod Res 40(5):1031–1050

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Li T-S, Huang H-H (2009) Applying TRIZ and Fuzzy AHP to develop innovative design for automated manufacturing systems. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):8302–8312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Li T (2010) Applying TRIZ and AHP to develop innovative design for automated assembly systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46:301–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bariani PF, Berti GA, Lucchetta G (2004) A combined DFMA and TRIZ approach to the simplification of product structure. Proc Ins Mech Eng Part B: J Eng Manuf 218(8):1023–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nix, A.A., Sherrett, B. and Stone, R.B. 2011. A function based approach to TRIZ. Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences, August 29–31, Washington, D.C

  10. Okudan GE, Ogot M, Shirwaiker R (2002) An Investigation on the Effectiveness Design Ideation Using TRIZ. Proceedings of IDETC/CIE 2006 Design Education Conference, September 10–13, 2006, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Okudan G.E., Chiu M-C, Lin C., Schmidt L., Vargas N, and Linsey J. "A pilot exploration of systematic ideation methods and tools on design learning" Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET), April 29th - May 1 2010

  12. Suh NP (1995) Designing-in of quality through axiomatic design. IEEE Trans Reliab 44(2):256–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mann, D., 1999. Axiomatic design and TRIZ: compatibilities and contradictions. The TRIZ Journal (http://www.triz-journal.com)

  14. Ruihong, Z., Runhua, T.,and Guozhong, C., 2004. Case study in AD and TRIZ:A papermachine. TRIZ Journal (http://www.trizjournal.com)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gül Okudan Kremer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kremer, G.O., Chiu, MC., Lin, CY. et al. Application of axiomatic design, TRIZ, and mixed integer programming to develop innovative designs: a locomotive ballast arrangement case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61, 827–842 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3752-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3752-1

Keywords

Navigation