Skip to main content
Log in

CHMM for tool condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To solve the problems of tool condition monitoring and prediction of remaining useful life, a method based on the Continuous Hidden Markov Model (CHMM) is presented. With milling as the research object, cutting force is taken as the monitoring signal, analyzed by wavelet packet theory to reduce noise and extract the energy feature of the signal as a basis for diagnosis. Then, CHMM is used to diagnose tool wear state. Finally, a Gaussian regression model is proposed to predict the milling tool’s remaining useful life after the test sample data are verified to be consistent with the Gaussian distribution based on a reliable identification of the milling tool wear state. The probability models of tool remaining useful life prediction could be established for tools with different initial states. For example, when an unknown state of milling force signal is delivered to the milling tool online diagnostic system, the state and the existing time of this state could be predicted by the established prediction model, and then, the average remaining useful life from the present state to the tool failure state could be obtained by analyzing the transfer time between each state in the CHMM. Compared to the traditional probabilistic model, which requires a large amount of test samples, the experimental cost is effectively reduced by applying the proposed method. The results from the experiment indicate that CHMM for tool condition monitoring has high sensitivity, requires less training samples and time, and produces results quickly. The method using the Gaussian process to accurately predict remaining life has ample potential for application to real situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Goode KB, Moore J, Roylance BJ (2000) Plant machinery working life prediction method utilizing reliability and condition-monitoring data. Proc IME E J Process Mech Eng 214(2):109–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Panda SS, Chakraborty D, Pal SK (2006) Monitoring of drill flank wear using fuzzy back-propagation neural network. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34(3–4):227–235

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wang GVP (2001) Fault prognostics using dynamic wavelet neural networks. Autotestcon Proc IEEE Syst Readiness Technol Conf 15(4):349–365

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Palanisamy P, Rajendran I, Shanmugasundaram S (2008) Prddiction of tool wear using regression and ANN models in end-milling operation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rabiner LR (1989) A tutorial on Hidden Markov Models and selected application in speech recognition. Proc IEEE 77(2):257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miao Q, Huang H-Z, Fan X (2007) A comparison study of support vector machines and Hidden Markov Models in machinery condition monitoring. J Mech Sci Technol 21:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ocak H, Loparo KA (2001) A new bearing fault detection and diagnosis scheme based on Hidden Markov Modeling of vibration signals. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing(ICASSP 2001), 7–11 May 2001, pp 3141–3144

  8. Dong M, He D (2007) A segmental hidden semi-Markov model (HSMM)-based diagnostics and prognostics framework and methodology. Mech Syst and Signal Process 21:2248–2266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Neal RM (1996) Bayesian learning for neural networks. Springer, New York, pp 29–51

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2006) Gaussian processes for machine learning. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 7–30

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang M (2010) A study of tool wear condition identification and tool remain useful life prediction. Sichuan University, Chengdu, pp 59–97

    Google Scholar 

  12. Willams CKI (1997) Prediction with Gaussian processes: from linear regression to linear prediction and beyond. Birmingham, Aston University, pp 599–621

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jun W, Fuzhi C, Yufong Z (1994) Research on the power monitoring method for milling cutter failure. Journal of Tsinghua University 2:58–63

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seeman M, Ganesan G, Karthikeyan R, Velayudham A (2010) Study on tool wear and surface roughness in machining of particulate aluminum metal matrix composite-response surface methodology approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 48:613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He Zheng Jia (2001) The application of the principles about fault diagnosis for nonstationary signal of machine design. Higher Education Press, Beijing, pp 102–112

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2008) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, pp 149–195

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mei Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, M., Wang, J. CHMM for tool condition monitoring and remaining useful life prediction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59, 463–471 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3536-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3536-7

Keywords

Navigation