Skip to main content
Log in

Improved feature-based test statistic for assessing suitability of the preliminary samples for constructing control limits of \( \bar{X} \) chart

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of using a large number of subgroups (m) of small samples (n), the estimated control limits of \( \bar{X} \)chart in phase I can be erroneous unless the preliminary samples are drawn from a stable process. As a result, the performance of the chart in phase II can be significantly affected. The pattern in the \( \bar{X} \)chart, exhibited by the plots of the subgroup averages of the preliminary samples, will be different depending on stability and instability of the process while the preliminary samples were collected. Based on this concept, a new feature-based test statistic (FTS) is proposed for evaluating suitability of the preliminary samples for the designing of the \( \bar{X} \)chart. The FTS, for given m, approximately follows \( N[1,{\text{ SD(}}m{)]} \), where SD(m) is a function of m. The goodness of the approximation and effectiveness of the test are evaluated using simulated data. The results show that both are satisfactory for m > =48. The proposed statistic is also quite effective in detecting unstable process condition resulting in a cyclic pattern. The computation of FTS involves some complexities. However, now-a-days computers are widely available and so computation difficulty may not be a problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Page ES (1954) Continuous inspection scheme. Biometrika 41:100–114

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Page ES (1961) Cumulative sum charts. Technometrics 3:1–9

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Woodall WH, Adams BM (1993) The statistical design of CUSUM charts. Qual Eng 5:559–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving averages. Technometrics 1:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lucus JM, Saccucci MS (1990) Exponentially weighted moving average control schemes: properties and enhancements. Technometrics 32:1–12

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Domangue R, Patch SC (1991) Some omnibus exponentially weighted moving average statistical process monitoring schemes. Technometrics 33:299–313

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Grant EL, Leavenworth RS (1988) Statistical quality control. McGraw-Hill, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ryan TP (1989) Statistical methods for quality improvement. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quesenberry CP (1993) The effect of sample size on estimated limits for \( \bar{X} \) and X control charts. J Qual Technol 25:237–247

    Google Scholar 

  11. DelCastillo E (1996) Run length distributions and economic design of \( \bar{X} \) charts with unknown process variance. Metrika 43:189–201

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen G (1997) The mean and standard deviation of the run length distribution of \( \bar{X} \) charts when control limits are estimated. Stat Sin 7:789–798

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chakraborti S (2000) Run length, average run length and false alarm rate of Shewhart \( \bar{X} \) chart: exact derivations by conditioning. communications in statistics. Simul Comptab 29:61–81

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Electric W (1956) Statistical quality control handbook. AT&T, Indianapolis

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nelson LS (1984) The Shewhart control chart—test for special causes. J Qual Technol 16:237–239

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nelson LS (1985) Interpreting Shewhart \( \bar{X} \) control chart. J Qual Technol 17:114–117

    Google Scholar 

  17. Champ CW, Woodall WH (1987) Exact results for Shewhart control chart for supplementary runs rules. Technometrics 29:393–399

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker E, Philpot JW, Clement J (1991) False signal rates for the Shewhart control chart with supplementary runs tests. J Qual Technol 23:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yang C, Tse SK, Li G (2006) False signal rates for the \( \bar{X} \) control charts with runs tests when process parameters are estimated. Commun Stat Simul Comput 35:1045–1056

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gauri SK (2010) A Test for suitability of the preliminary samples for constructing control limits of \( \bar{X} \) chart. J Stat Comput Simul 80:689–705

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pham DT, Wani MA (1997) Feature-based control chart pattern recognition. Int J Prod Res 35:1875–1890

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gauri SK, Chakraborty S (2007) A study on the various features for effective control chart pattern recognition. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34:285–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gauri SK, Chakraborty S (2009) Recognition of control chart patterns using improved selection of features. Comput Ind Eng 56:1577–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Matlab 7.0.1. (2004) The MathWorks Inc. Natick, MA

  25. Conover WJ (1980) Practical nonparametric statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanta Kumar Gauri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gauri, S.K. Improved feature-based test statistic for assessing suitability of the preliminary samples for constructing control limits of \( \bar{X} \) chart. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58, 1171–1187 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3440-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3440-1

Keywords

Navigation