Advertisement

Multi-objective optimization of green sand mould system using evolutionary algorithms

  • B. Surekha
  • Lalith K. Kaushik
  • Abhishek K. Panduy
  • Pandu R. Vundavilli
  • Mahesh B. Parappagoudar
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

The quality of cast products in green sand moulds is largely influenced by the mould properties, such as green compression strength, permeability, hardness and others, which depend on the input (process) parameters (that is, grain fineness number, percentage of clay, percentage of water and number of strokes). This paper presents multi-objective optimization of green sand mould system using evolutionary algorithms, such as genetic algorithm (GA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO). In this study, non-linear regression equations developed between the control factors (process parameters) and responses like green compression strength, permeability, hardness and bulk density have been considered for optimization utilizing GA and PSO. As the green sand mould system contains four objectives, an attempt is being made to form a single objective, after considering all the four individual objectives, to obtain a compromise solution, which satisfies all the four objectives. The results of this study show a good agreement with the experimental results.

Keywords

Green sand mould system Optimization Genetic algorithm Particle swarm optimization 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Marek CT (1966) Green sand permeability—its significance and control. AFS Trans 74:70–81Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Frost J, Hiller JM (1966) The mechanics of green sand moulding. AFS Trans 74:177–186Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wenninger EC (1968) Green sand processing: an introduction to current fundamental thinking. AFS Trans 76:101–111Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dhindaw KB, Chakraborty M (1974) Study and control of properties and behavior of different sand systems by application of statistical design of experiments. In: Proceedings of the 41st international foundry congress, pp 9–14Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Casalino G, De Filippis LAC, Ludovico A (2005) A technical note on the mathematical and physical characterization of selective laser sintered sand for rapid casting. J Mater Process Technol 166:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Parappagoudar MB, Pratihar DK, Datta GL (2007) Linear and non-linear statistical modeling of green sand mould system. Int J Cast Met Res 20(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parappagoudar MB, Pratihar DK, Datta GL (2007) Non-linear modeling using central composite design to predict green sand mould properties. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manufacture 221:881–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sushil kumar, Satsangi PS, Prajapati DR (2010) Optimization of green sand casting process parameters of a foundry by using Taguchi method. Int J Adv Manuf Tech. doi:  10.1007/s00170-010-3029-0
  9. 9.
    Rosenberg RS (1967) Simulation of genetic populations with biochemical properties. Ph.D. thesis, University of MichiganGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee TS, Ting TO, Lin YJ (2007) An investigation of grinding process optimization via evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE swarm intelligence symposiumGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sardinas RQ, Santana MR, Brindis EA (2006) Genetic algorithm-based multi-objective optimization of cutting parameters in turning process. Eng Appl Artif Intell 19:127–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Datta R, Majumder A (2010) Optimization of turning process parameters using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the IEEE congress on evolutionary computation, Barcelona, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ali-Tavoli M, Nariman-Zadeh N, Khakhali A, Mehran M (2006) Multi-objective optimization of abrasive flow machining process using polynomial neural networks and genetic algorithms. Machining Sci Technol 10(4):491–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kuriakose S, Shanmugam MS (2005) Multi-objective optimization of wire-electro discharge machining process by non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 170:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hong X, Yuan Li, Kaifu Z, Jianfeng Y, Zhenxing L, Jianbin S (2010) Multi-objective optimization method for automatic drilling and riveting sequence planning. Chin J Aeronaut 23:734–742CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rao RV, Pawar PJ, Shankar R (2008) Multi-objective optimization of electrochemical machining process parameters using a particle swarm optimization. Proc IMechE B J Eng Manufacture 222:949–958Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kumar CA, Nair NK (2010) “Multi-objective PID controller based on adaptive weighted PSO with application to steam temperature control in boilers”. Int J Eng Sci Technol 2(7):3179–3184Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hu X, Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2003) Engineering optimization with particle swarm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE swarm intelligence symposium 2003 (SIS 2003), Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, pp. 243–246Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raquel C, Naval P (2005) An effective use of crowding distance in multiobjective particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on genetic and evolutionary computation, Washington DC, USA, pp 257–264Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • B. Surekha
    • 1
  • Lalith K. Kaushik
    • 2
  • Abhishek K. Panduy
    • 2
  • Pandu R. Vundavilli
    • 1
  • Mahesh B. Parappagoudar
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringDVR & Dr. HS MIC College of TechnologyKanchikacherlaIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringRungta College of Engineering & TechnologyBhilaiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringChhatrapati Shivaji Institute of TechnologyDurgIndia

Personalised recommendations