Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrated supervised learning solution for monitoring process mean vector

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When an out-of-control condition is detected by a control chart, a search begins to identify and eliminate the source(s) of the signal. Identification of the time when a process first changed is an important step in root cause analysis which helps a process engineer to eliminate the source(s) of assignable cause effectively. The time when a change takes place in the process is referred to as the change point. In multivariate environment, since there is more than one variable involved, then root cause analysis is relatively harder compared to the case of univariate because it is not clear exactly which variable has contributed to the out-of-control condition and in what direction its mean has shifted. Hence, a procedure that identifies the change point, performs diagnostic analysis, and specifies the direction of the shift in the mean of the contributing variable(s) all simultaneously could help to conduct root cause analysis effectively. Although different multivariate methods exist in the literature that allow to either estimate change point in the process mean vector or identify the contributing variables leading to the out-of-control condition, but in this research, an integrated supervised learning solution is proposed, which helps to (1) detect of an out-of-control condition, (2) identify the change point leading to shift in the mean vector, (3) specify the variable(s) contributing to the out-of-condition, and (4) identify the direction of the shift in the mean of each contributing variable simultaneously. A real case study is used to evaluate and compare the performance of the proposed integrated approach to existing methods in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pignatielo JR, Samuel TR (1988) Identifying the time of a step change with XBar control charts. J Qual Eng 10(3):521–527

    Google Scholar 

  2. Perry MB, Pignatielo JJ (2006) Estimation of the change point of a normal process mean with a linear trend disturbance. QTQM 3(3):101–115

    Google Scholar 

  3. Noorossana R, Shademan A (2009) Estimating the change point of a normal process mean with a monotonic change. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(1):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sullivan JH, Woodall WH (2000) Change-point detection of mean vector or covariance matrix shifts using multivariate individual observation. IIE Trans 32(6):537–549

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nedumaran G, Pignatiello JJ, Calvin JA (2000) Identifying the time of a step-change with χ2 control charts. Qual Eng 13(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li F, Runger GC, Tun E (2006) Supervised learning for change-point detection. Int J Prod Res 44(14):2853–2868

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hotelling H (1947) Multivariate quality control illustrated by the air testing of sample bombsights. In: Eisenhart C, Hastay MW, Wallis WA (eds) Techniques of statistical analysis. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Crosier RB (1988) Multivariate generalization of cumulative sum quality control schemes. Technometrics 30(3):291–302

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Pignatiello JJ, Runger GC (1990) Comparison of multivariate CUSUM charts. J Qual Technol 22(2):173–186

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (1992) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 34(1):46–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Runger GC, Testik MC (2004) Multivariate extensions to cumulative sum control charts. Qual Reliab Int 20(6):587–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Srivastava MS, Worsley KJ (1986) Likelihood ratio tests for a change in the multivariate normal mean. J Am Stat Assoc 81(393):199–204

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chua MK, Montgomery DC (1992) Investigation and characterization of a control scheme for multivariate quality control. Qual Reliab Eng Int 8(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wade MR, Woodall WH (1993) A review and analysis of cause-selecting control charts. J Qual Technol 25(3):161–170

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hawkins DM (1993) Regression adjustment for variables in multivariate quality control. J Qual Technol 25(3):170–182

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hayter AJ, Tsui KL (1994) Identification and quantification in multivariate quality control problems. J Qual Technol 26(3):197–208

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mason RL, Tracy ND, Young JC (1995) Decomposition of T 2 for multivariate control chart interpretation. J Qual Technol 27(2):99–108

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kourti T, MacGregor JF (1996) Multivariate SPC methods for process and product monitoring. J Qual Technol 28(4):409–428

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mason RL, Tracy ND, Young JC (1997) A practical approach for interpreting multivariate T 2 control chart signals. J Qual Technol 29(4):396–406

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nottingham QJ, Cook DF, Zobel CW (2001) Visualization of multivariate data with radial plots using SAS. Comput Ind Eng 41(1):17–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maravelakis PE, Bersimis S, Panaretos J, Psarakis S (2002) On identifying the out of control variable in a multivariate control chart. Commun Stat- Theory Methods 31(12):2391–2408

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Niaki STA, Abbasi B (2005) Fault diagnosis in multivariate control charts using artificial neural network. Qual Reliab Eng Int 21(8):825–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bersimis S, Psarakis S, Panaretos J (2007) Multivariate statistical process control chart: an overview. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(5):517–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hwang HB, Hubele NF (1993) Back-propagation pattern recognizers for \( \overline X \) control charts: methodology and performance. Comput Ind Eng 24(2):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cheng C (1995) A multi-layer neural network model for detecting changes in the process mean. Comput Ind Eng 28(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chang SI, Aw CA (1996) A neural fuzzy control chart for detecting and classifying process mean shifts. Int J Prod Res 34(8):2265–2278

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng CS (1997) A neural network approach for the analysis of control chart patterns. Int J Prod Res 35(3):667–697

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Guh RS, Tannock TD (1997) A neural network approach to characterize pattern parameters in process control charts. J Intell Manuf 10(5):449–462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Noorossana R, Farrokhi M, Saghaei A (2003) Using neural networks to detect and classify out-of-control signals in autocorrelated processes. Qual Reliab Eng Int 19(6):493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zorriassatine F, Tannockb JDT, O’Brienb C (2003) Using novelty detection to identify abnormalities caused by mean shifts in bivariate processes. Comput Ind Eng 44(3):385–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hwarng HB (2004) Detecting process mean shift in the presence of autocorrelation: a neural network based monitoring scheme. Int J Prod Res 42(3):573–595

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Guh RS (2007) On-line identification and quantification of mean shifts in bivariate processes using a neural network-based approach. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(3):367–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hwarng HB (2008) Toward identifying the source of mean shifts in multivariate SPC: a neural network approach. Int J Prod Res 46(20):5531–5559

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Atashgar K, Noorossana R (2011) An integrating approach to root-cause analysis of a bivariate mean vector with a linear trend disturbance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1):407–420

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zorriassatine F, Tannock JDT (1998) A review of neural networks for statistical process control. J Intell Manuf 9(3):209–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hwarng HB (2005) Simultaneous identification of mean shift and correlation change in AR(1) processes. Int J Prod Res 43(9):1761–1783

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Guo Y, Dooley KJ (1992) Identification of change structure in statistical process control. Int J Prod Res 30(7):1655–1669

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran, 16846-13114

    Rassoul Noorossana & Karim Atashgar

  2. Industrial Engineering Department, Islamic Azad University-Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran

    Abbas Saghaei

Authors
  1. Rassoul Noorossana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karim Atashgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Abbas Saghaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karim Atashgar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noorossana, R., Atashgar, K. & Saghaei, A. An integrated supervised learning solution for monitoring process mean vector. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56, 755–765 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3188-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3188-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation