Skip to main content

Experimental comparison of dynamic tracking performance of iGPS and laser tracker

Abstract

External metrology systems are increasingly being integrated with traditional industrial articulated robots, especially in the aerospace industries, to improve their absolute accuracy for precision operations such as drilling, machining and jigless assembly. While currently most of the metrology assisted robotics control systems are limited in their position update rate, such that the robot has to be stopped in order to receive a metrology coordinate update, some recent efforts are addressed toward controlling robots using real-time metrology data. The indoor GPS is one of the metrology systems that may be used to provide real-time 6DOF data to a robot controller. Even if there is a noteworthy literature dealing with the evaluation of iGPS performance, there is, however, a lack of literature on how well the iGPS performs under dynamic conditions. This paper presents an experimental evaluation of the dynamic measurement performance of the iGPS, tracking the trajectories of an industrial robot. The same experiment is also repeated using a laser tracker. Besides the experiment results presented, this paper also proposes a novel method for dynamic repeatability comparisons of tracking instruments.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Kayani A, Jamshidi J (2007) Measurement assisted assembly for large volume aircraft wing structures. Proceedings of DET2007, 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology, Bath

  2. Rooks B (2001) Automatic wing box assembly developments. Ind Rob 28(4):297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Eastwood SJ, Webb P, Mckeown C (2003) The use of the TI2 manufacturing system on a double-curvature aerospace panel. Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical Engineers Part B. Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol 217, pp 849

  4. Webb P, Eastwood SJ (2004) An evaluation of the TI2 manufacturing system for the machining of airframe subassemblies. Proceedings of Institute of Mechanical Engineers Part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacture, vol 218, p 819

  5. Alici G, Shirinzadeh B (2003) Laser interferometry based robot position error modelling for kinematic calibration. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE/RSJ, International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Las Vegas, Nevada, 27–31 October 2003

  6. Maisano D, Jamshidi J, Franceschini F, Maropoulos PG, Mastrogiacomo L, Mileham AR, Owen GW (2008) Indoor GPS: system functionality and initial performance evaluation. IJMR 3:335–349 (no. 3)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Muelaner JE, Wang Z, Jamshidi J, Maropoulos PG, Mileham AR, Hughes EB, Forbes AB (2008) iGPS—an initial assessment of technical and deployment capability. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering (ICMEN), Chalkidiki, Greece

  8. Wang Z, Jamshidi J, Maropoulos P, Owen G, Mileham T (2008) “Experimental deployment of the indoor gps large volume metrology system in a large scale production facility” Proceedings of the 3 rd International Conference on Manufacturing Engineering (ICMEN), Chalkidiki, Greece

  9. Muelaner J, Hughes B, Forbes A, Maropoulos P, Jamshidi J, Wang Z, Sun W (2008) iGPS capability assessment. Large Volume Metrology Conference, Liverpool

  10. VIM (2004) International vocabulary of basic and general terms in metrology, third edition. ISO/DG 99999. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  11. ARCSecond (2002) Indoor GPS technology for Metrology. White Paper 071502, ARCSecond, Dulles

  12. ASME B89.4.19 (2006) Performance evaluation of laser-based spherical coordinate measurement systems http://catalog.asme.org/Codes/PrintBook/B89419_2006_Performance.cfm

  13. Estler WT, Edmundson KL, Peggs GN, Parker DH (2002) Large scale metrology—an update. CIRP Annals, NIST Technipubs

  14. FARO Europe GmbH & Co. KG (2004) New faro laser tracker SI. 2: tougher with exclusive features. Faro UK technical specification sheet

  15. Wang Z (2008) “KUKA KR240 robot repeatability study”, Airbus ALCAS internal report

  16. Street JO, Carroll RJ, Ruppert D (1988) A note on computing robust regression estimates via iteratively reweighted least squares. Am Stat 42:152–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. KUKA Roboter GmbH, Germany (2002) KR 240-2–KR 240 L210-2 –KR 240 L180-2 (Series 2000) Technical data. KWM–Nr. 841612–86/D+E/3/04.05

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luca Mastrogiacomo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Mastrogiacomo, L., Franceschini, F. et al. Experimental comparison of dynamic tracking performance of iGPS and laser tracker. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56, 205–213 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3166-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3166-0

Keywords

  • Indoor GPS
  • Laser tracker
  • Dynamic performance