Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Mathematical modeling of a vehicle crash test based on elasto-plastic unloading scenarios of spring-mass models

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper investigates the usability of spring which exhibit nonlinear force-deflection characteristic in the area of mathematical modeling of vehicle crash. We present a method which allows us to obtain parameters of the spring-mass model basing on the full-scale experimental data analysis. Since vehicle collision is a dynamic event, it involves such phenomena as rebound and energy dissipation. Three different spring unloading scenarios (elastic, plastic, and elasto-plastic) are covered and their suitability for vehicle collision simulation is evaluated. Subsequently we assess which of those models fits the best to the real car’s behavior not only in terms of kinematic responses but also in terms of energy distribution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pawlus W, Nielsen JE, Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG (2010) Mathematical modeling and analysis of a vehicle crash. In: The 4th European computing conference, Bucharest, Romania

  2. Pawlus W, Nielsen JE, Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG (2010) Development of mathematical models for analysis of a vehicle crash. WSEAS Trans Appl Theor Mech 5(2):156–165

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pawlus W, Nielsen JE, Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG (2010) Further results on mathematical models of vehicle localized impact. In: The 3rd international symposium on systems and control in aeronautics and astronautics, Harbin, China

  4. Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG (2010) Wavelet-based signal analysis of a vehicle crash test with a fixed safety barrier. In: WSEAS 4th European computing conference, Bucharest, Romania

  5. Šušteršič G, Grabec I, Prebil I (2007) Statistical model of a vehicle-to-barrier collision. Int J Impact Eng 34(10):1585–1593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Trusca D, Soica A, Benea B, Tarulescu S (2009) Computer simulation and experimental research of the vehicle impact. WSEAS Trans Comput 8(1):1185–1194

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vangi D (2009) Energy loss in vehicle to vehicle oblique impact. Int J Impact Eng 36(3):512–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giavotto V, Puccinelli L, Borri M, Edelman A, Heijer T (1983) Vehicle dynamics and crash dynamics with minicomputer. Comput Struct 16(1):381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harmati IA, Rovid A, Szeidl L, Varlaki P (2008) Energy distribution modeling of car body deformation using LPV representations and fuzzy reasoning. WSEAS Trans Syst 7(1):1228–1237

    Google Scholar 

  10. Omar T, Eskandarian A, Bedewi N (1998) Vehicle crash modelling using recurrent neural networks. Math Comput Model 28(9):31–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pawlus W, Nielsen JE, Karimi HR, Robbersmyr KG (2010) Comparative analysis of vehicle to pole collision models established using analytical methods and neural networks. In: The 5th IET international system safety conference, Manchester, UK

  12. Várkonyi-Kóczy AR, Rövid A, Várlaki P (2004) Intelligent methods for car deformation modeling and crash speed estimation. In: The 1st Romanian–Hungarian joint symposium on applied computational intelligence, Timisoara, Romania

  13. van der Laan E, Veldpaus F, de Jager B, Steinbuch M (2008) LPV modeling of vehicle occupants. In: AVEC ’08 9th international symposium on advanced vehicle control, Kobe, Japan

  14. Elmarakbi AM, Zu JW (2006) Crash analysis and modeling of two vehicles in frontal collisions using two types of smart front-end structures: an analytical approach using IHBM. Int J Crashworthiness 11(5):467–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fang H, Rais-Rohani M, Liu Z, Horstemeyer MF (2005) A comparative study of metamodeling methods for multiobjective crashworthiness optimization. Comput Struct 83(25–26):2121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Conroy C, Tominaga GT, Erwin S, Pacyna S, Velky T, Kennedy F, Sise M, Coimbra R (2008) The influence of vehicle damage on injury severity of drivers in head-on motor vehicle crashes. Accident Anal Prev 40(4):1589–1594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Niu Y, Shen W, Stuhmiller JH (2007) Finite element models of rib as an inhomogeneous beam structure under high-speed impacts. Med Eng Phys 29(7):788–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JK, Ulfarssonn GF, Shankar VN, Mannering FL (2010) A note on modeling pedestrian-injury severity in motor-vehicle crashes with the mixed logit model. Accident Anal Prev 42(6):1751–1758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ma J, Kockelman KM, Damien P (2008) A multivariate Poisson-lognormal regression model for prediction of crash counts by severity, using Bayesian methods. Accident Anal Prev 40(3):964–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbersmyr KG (2004) Calibration test of a standard ford fiesta 1.1l, model year 1987, according to NS - EN 12767. Technical Report 43/2004, Agder Research, Grimstad

  21. Huang M (2002) Vehicle crash mechanics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamid Reza Karimi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pawlus, W., Karimi, H.R. & Robbersmyr, K.G. Mathematical modeling of a vehicle crash test based on elasto-plastic unloading scenarios of spring-mass models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 55, 369–378 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3056-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-3056-x

Keywords

Navigation