Advertisement

Quality monitoring of a closed-loop system with parametric uncertainties and external disturbances: a fault detection and isolation approach

  • M. A. Rahim
  • Haris M. KhalidEmail author
  • Muhammad Akram
  • Amar Khoukhi
  • L. Cheded
  • Rajamani Doraiswami
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Due to aging and environmental factors, system components may either fail or not function as expected, which causes unprecedented changes in the quality of the system. A timely detection of the onset of a fault in a component is crucial to a quality monitoring of a process if costly failures are to be avoided. However, finding the source of the failure is not trivial in systems with a large number of components and complex component relationships. In this paper, an efficient scheme to detect adverse changes in system reliability and find the failed component is proposed in order to have an effective process quality monitoring. The monitoring scheme has been made effective by implementing first the techniques of fixed-parameter Shewhart, MEWMA and Hotelling’s T2 control chart, and then the adaptive versions of Shewhart Chart, MEWMA and T2 control chart for counter checking the precision of quality reports. Once detected, the fault isolation scheme uses a Bayesian decision strategy based on the maximum correlation between the residual and one of a number of hypothesized residual estimates to generate a fault report. By doing so, the critical information about the presence or absence of a fault, and its isolation, is gained in a timely manner, thus making the quality monitoring system an effective tool for a variety of maintenance programs, especially of the preventive type. The proposed scheme is evaluated extensively on simulated examples, and on a physical fluid system exemplified by a benchmarked laboratory scale two-tank system to detect and isolate faults including sensor, actuator, and leakage ones.

Keywords

Quality monitoring Fault detection Adaptive Shewhart chart Adaptive EWMA Adaptive T2 chart Benchmarked laboratory-scaled two-tank system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Doguc O, Ramirez-Marquez JE (2009) An efficient fault diagnosis method for complex system reliability. In: 7th annual conference on systems engineering research (CSER 2009), Loughborough, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pudar RS, Ligget JA (1992) Leaks in pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng 118(7):1031–1046CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ligget JA, Chen LC (1994) Inverse transient analysis in pipe networks. J Hydraul Eng 120(8):934–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liou JCP, Tian J (1995) Leak detection-transient flow simulation approaches. J Energy Resour Technol 117(3):243–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Liou CP (1998) Pipeline leak detection by impulse response extraction. J Fluids Eng 120(4):833–838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mpesha W, Gassman SL, Chaudhry MH (2001) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method. J Hydraul Eng 127(2):134–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mpesha W, Gassman SL, Chaudhry MH (2002) Leak detection in pipes by frequency response method using a step excitation. J Hydraul Res 40(7):55–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mukherjee J, Narasimhan S (1996) Leak detection in networks of pipelines by generalized likelihood ratio method. Ind Eng Chem J 35(6):1886–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arreguín-Cortes FI, Ochoa-Alejo LH (1997) Evaluation of water losses in distribution networks. J Water Resour Plan Manage 123(5):284–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andersen JH, Powell RS (2000) Implicit state-estimation technique for water network monitoring. Urban Water J 2:123–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wikström C, Albano C, Eriksson L, Fridén H, Johansson E, Nordahl Å, Rännar S, Sandberg M, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wold S (1998) Multivariate process and quality monitoring applied to an electrolysis process. Part I. Process supervision with multivariate control charts. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 42(1–2):221–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Albert S, Kinley RD (2001) Multivariate statistical monitoring of batch processes: an industrial case study of fermentation supervision. Trends Biotechnol 19(2):53–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lieftucht D, Kruger U, Irwin GW (2006) Improved reliability in diagnosing faults using multivariate statistics. Comput Chem Eng 30(5):901–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Aguado D, Rosen C (2008) Multivariate statistical monitoring of continuous wastewater treatment plants. Eng Appl Artif Intell 21(7):1080–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Misra M, Yu HH, Qin SJ, Ling C (2002) Multivariate process monitoring and fault diagnosis by multi-scale PCA. Comput Chem Eng 26(9):1281–1293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ogunnaike BA, Ray WH (1994) Process dynamics, modelling, and control. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kourti T, MacGregor JF (1995) Process analysis, monitoring and diagnosis, using multivariate projection methods. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 28(1):3–21Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Crosier RB (1988) Multivariate generalizations of cumulative sum quality control schemes. Technometrics 30:291–303MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (1992) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 34:46–53zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grigoryan A, He D (2005) Multivariate double sampling S charts for controlling process variability. Int J Prod Res 43(5):715–730zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Daudin JJ (1992) Double sampling X-bar charts. J Qual Technol 24(2):78–87Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    He D, Grigoryan A (2005) Multivariate multiple sampling charts. IIE Trans 37(6):509–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    He D, Grigoryan A (2006) Statistical design of joint double sampling X and S charts. Eur J Oper Res 168(1):122–142MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuchar JT (1996) Methodology for alerting-system performance evaluation. J Guid Control Dyn 19(2):438–444MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. A. Rahim
    • 1
  • Haris M. Khalid
    • 2
    Email author
  • Muhammad Akram
    • 2
  • Amar Khoukhi
    • 2
  • L. Cheded
    • 2
  • Rajamani Doraiswami
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationUniversity of New Brunswick, FrederictonNew BrunswickCanada
  2. 2.Department of Systems EngineeringKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsDhahranSaudi Arabia
  3. 3.Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringUniversity of New Brunswick, FrederictonNew BrunswickCanada

Personalised recommendations