Abstract
In layered manufacturing, geometrical gap occurs between the computer-aided design (CAD) model and the fabricated, due to the stair-stepping effect. It will deteriorate the surface quality of the microstructure. By reducing the stair steps, the surface quality of a layered manufactured microstructure can be improved. In this research, dithering method is introduced to improve the surface quality of a microstructure in projection microstereolithography. The dithering method can represent grayscale effect with monochrome image, so it is applicable to the digital micromirror device for ultraviolet, which allows monochrome image as an input format. By adjusting the beam intensity using the dithered image, it is possible to control the cure depth of the resin within a layer. In a cross-section, the region to be dithered is obtained by the difference of the cross-sections between the current layer and the previous layer. It is called a compensation area (CA) in this research. The gray level to be applied is determined considering the CAD model and the curing characteristics of the resin. The dithered CA is then combined with the current cross-section. The parabola-shaped microstructures, using dithered and non-dithered cross-sectional images, have been fabricated and compared. The dithering method has shown good performance for improving surface quality and reducing the fabrication time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Varadan VK, Jiang X, Varadan VV (2001) Microstereo-lithography and other fabrication techniques for 3D MEMS. Wiley, San Francisco, USA
Jacobs PF (1992) Rapid prototyping and manufacturing: fundamentals of stereolithography. SME, Dearborn
Holzer F, Fadel G (2002) Design of a 3-degrees of freedom platform for stereolithography apparatus. Rap Proto J 8(2):100–115
Arif KM, Murakami T (2009) Slant beam rotation UV scanning to eliminate stair- steps in stereolithography fabrications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41(5–6):527–537
Ng P, Fang W (1998) Motion compensation for five-axis rapid prototyping system. Rap Proto J 4(2):68–76
Murakami T, Yada T, Kobayashi G (2006) Positive direct-mask stereolithography with multi-layer exposure: layered fabrication with stair step reduction. Vir Phys Proto 1(2):73–81
Reeves PE, Cobb RC (1996) Surface roughness investigation of stereolithography ACES components. Proceedings of the 2nd National Conference on Developments in Rapid Prototyping and Tooling, pp. 17–25
Williams RE, Melton VL (1998) Abrasive flow finishing of stereolithography prototypes. Rap Proto J 4(2):56–67
Ahn DK, Lee SH (2007) Improving the surface roughness of SL parts using a coating and grinding process. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 8(3):14–19
Frank D, Fadel G (1995) Expert system-based selection of the preferred direction of build for rapid prototyping processes. J Intell Manuf 6(5):339–345
Cheng W, Fuh JYH, Nee AYC, Wong YS, Loh HT, Miyazawa T (1995) Multi-objective optimization of part-building orientation in stereolithography. Rap Proto J 1(4):12–23
Ahn DK, Kim HC, Lee SH (2007) Fabrication direction optimization to minimize post-machining in layered manufacturing. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(3–4):593–606
Hope RL, Roth RN, Jacobs PA (1997) Adaptive slicing with sloping layer surfaces. Rap Proto J 3(3):89–98
Tata K, Fadel G, Bagchi A, Aziz N (1998) Efficient slicing for layered manufacturing. Rap Proto J 4(4):151–167
Kumar C, Choudhury AR (2005) Volume deviation in direct slicing. Rap Proto J 11(3):174–184
Ciurana J, Arias G, Ozel T (2009) Neural network modeling and particle swarm optimization (PSO) of process parameters in pulsed laser micromachining of hardened AISI H13 steel. Mater Manuf Process 24(3):358–368
Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface rough ness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tool Manu 43(8):833–844
Ho SY, Lee KC, Chen SS, Ho SJ (2002) Accurate modeling and prediction of surface roughness by computer vision in turning operations using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Int J Mach Tool Manu 42(13):1441–1446
Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robot CIM-Int Manuf 18(5–6):343–354
Hayashi T, Shibata T, Kawashima T, Makino E, Mineta T, Masuzawa T (2008) Photolithography system with liquid crystal display as active gray-tone mask for 3D structuring of photoresist. Sens Actuators A 144(2):381–388
Bertsch A, Zissi S, Jézéquel JY, Corbel S, André JC (1997) Microstereolithography using a liquid crystal display as dynamic mask generator. Microsyst Technol 3(2):42–47
Douglass MR (1998) Lifetime estimates and unique failure mechanism of the digital micromirror device. IEEE Int Reliab Phys Symp 9–16
Dudley D, Duncan W, Slaughter J (2003) Emerging digital micromirror device (DMD) applications. SPIE Proc 4985:14–25
Park IB, Choi JW, Ha YM, Lee SH (2009) Multiple fabrications of sacrificial layers to enhance the dimensional accuracy of microstructures in maskless projection microstereolithography. Int J Precis Eng Manuf 10(1):91–98
Ha YM, Choi JW, Lee SH (2008) Mass production of 3-D microstructures using projection microstereolithography. J Mech Sci Technol 22(3):514–521
Johnson S (2006) Stephen Johnson on digital photography. O’Reilly
Floyd RW, Steinberg L (1976) An adaptive algorithm for spatial grayscale. Proc Soc Inf Disp 17(2):75–77
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Park, I.B., Ha, Y.M. & Lee, S.H. Dithering method for improving the surface quality of a microstructure in projection microstereolithography. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52, 545–553 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2748-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2748-6