Abstract
Microsystem technologies require relatively strict quality requirements. This is because their functionalities are usually dependent on stringent requirements of dimensions, masses or tolerances. When mass-producing micro-components, e.g. replication of disposable microfluidic diagnostics devices, the consistency of the produced components could be significantly affected by process variability. The variability could be associated with a specific process parameter or could be a result of process noise. This paper presents a methodology to assess and minimise process variability in micro-injection moulding, an example of well-established mass-production techniques for micro-components. A design-of-experiments approach was implemented, where five process parameters were investigated for possible effects on the process variability of two components. The variability was represented by the standard deviation of the replicated part mass. It was found that melt temperature was a significant source of variability in part mass for one of the components, whilst the other was affected by unsystematic variability. Optimisations tools such as response surfaces and desirability functions were implemented to minimise mass variability by more than 40%.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Attia UM, Marson S, Alcock JR (2009) Micro-injection moulding of polymer microfluidic devices. Microfluid Nanofluid 7:1–28
Mönkkönen K, Hietala J, Pääkkönen P, Pääkkönen EJ, Kaikuranta T, Pakkanen TT, Jääskeläinen T (2002) Replication of sub-micron features using amorphous thermoplastics. Polym Eng Sci 42:1600–1608
Aufiero R (2005) The effect of process conditions on part quality in microinjection molding. ANTEC: Proc Annual Technical Conf (Boston, MA, 1–5 May 2005): 36–40
Sha B, Dimov S, Griffiths C, Packianather MS (2007) Micro-injection moulding: factors affecting the achievable aspect ratios. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 33:147–156
Pirskanen J, Immonen J, Kalima V, Pietarinen J, Siitonen S, Kuittinen M, Mönkkönen K, Pakkanen T, Suvanto M, Pääkkönen EJ (2005) Replication of sub-micrometre features using microsystems technology. Plast Rubber Compos 34:222–226
Sha B, Dimov S, Griffiths C, Packianather MS (2007) Investigation of micro-injection moulding: factors affecting the replication quality. J Mater Process Technol 183:284–296
Zhao J, Mayes R, Chen G, Xie H, Chan P (2003) Effects of process parameters on the micro molding process. Polym Eng Sci 43:1542–1554
Zhao J, Mayes R, Chen G, Chan PS, Xiong ZJ (2003) Polymer micromould design and micromoulding process. Plast Rubber Compos 32:240–247
Ong NS, Koh YH (2005) Experimental investigation into micro injection molding of plastic parts. Mater Manuf Process 20:245–253
Attia UM, Alcock JR (2009) An evaluation of process-parameter and part-geometry effects on the quality of filling in micro-injection moulding. Microsyst Technol 15:1861–1872. doi:10.1007/s00542-009-0923-1
Attia UM, Alcock JR (2010) Optimising process conditions for multiple quality criteria in micro-injection moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-010-2547-0
Griffiths C, Dimov S, Brousseau EB, Hoyle RT (2007) The effects of tool surface quality in micro-injection moulding. J Mater Process Technol 189:418–427
Jung W-C, Heo Y-M, Shin K-H, Yoon G-S, Chang S-H (2007) An experimatal study on micro injection paramaters. ANTEC: Proc Annual Technical Conf (Cincinnati, OH, 6–11 May 2007): 638–642
Lee B-K, Hwang CJ, Kim DS, Kwon TH (2008) Replication quality of flow-through microfilters in microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for blood typing by microinjection molding. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 130:0210101–0210108
Tosello G, Gava A, Hansen HN, Lucchetta G (2007) Influence of process parameters on the weld lines of a micro injection molded component. ANTEC: Proc Annual Technical Conf (Cincinnati, OH, 6–11 May 2007): 2002–2006
Griffiths CA, Dimov S, Brousseau EB, Chouquet C, Gavillet J, Bigot S (2008) Micro-injection moulding: surface treatment effects on part demoulding. Proc 4M2008 (Cardiff, UK, 9th–11th September 2008)
Shen YK, Yeh SL, Chen SH (2002) Three-dimensional non-Newtonian computations of micro-injection molding with the finite element method. Int Commun Heat Mass 29:643–652
Del Vecchio RJ (1997) Understanding design of experiments: a primer for technologists. Hanser/Gardner Publications, Cincinnati
Antony J (2003) Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford
Eriksson L, Johansson N, Kettaneh-Wold N, Wikstrom C, Wold S (2008) Design of experiments: principles and applications, 3rd edn. Umetrics, Umeå
Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments, 6th edn. Wiley, Hoboken, Great Britain
Marson S, Attia UM, Allen DM, Tipler P, Jin T, Hedge J, Alcock JR (2009) Reconfigurable micro-mould for the manufacture of truly 3D polymer microfluidic devices. Proc CIRP Design Conf (Cranfield, UK, 30–31 March 2009): 343–346
Minitab Inc. Available at: www.minitab.com. Accessed on: 2010
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Attia, U.M., Alcock, J.R. Evaluating and controlling process variability in micro-injection moulding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52, 183–194 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2724-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2724-1