Model-based definition design in the product lifecycle management scenario



Model-based definition (MBD) is a new strategy of product lifecycle management (PLM) based on computer-aided design (CAD) models transition from simple gatherers of geometrical data to comprehensive sources of information for the overall product lifecycle. With MBD, most of the data related to a product are structured inside native CAD models, instead of being scattered in different forms through the PLM database. MBD aims are suppression of redundant documents and drawings, better data consistency, better product/process virtualization, and better support for all computer-aided technologies tasks under engineering and manufacturing disciplines. Developing MBD today, for a medium- to large-sized company in the automotive and aerospace sectors, deals primarily with its fundamentals: data structures. Companies need a common approach to structure data in reusable, unified forms inside native three-dimensional CAD models. For this reason, this research work has been developed by focusing the attention on a method for supporting the MBD implementation by the use of the quality function deployment approach. In order to analyze the efficacy of the proposed approach, it has been validated in the aerospace and defense domain where companies deal with complex products, characterized by a large amount of data exchange, and where collaborative design is a fundamental practice.


Model-based definition Product lifecycle management Computer-aided design Paperless engineering Product virtualization 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Aberdeen Group (2006) The transition from 2D drafting to 3D modeling benchmark report. Improving engineering efficiency. Available at
  2. 2.
    Danesi F, Gardan N, Gardan Y, Reimeringer M (2008) P4LM: a methodology for product lifecycle management. Comput Ind 59:304–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Qiu ZM, Kok KF, Wong YS, Fuh Jerry YH (2007) Role-based 3D visualization for asynchronous PLM collaboration. Comput Ind 58:747–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Song I, Chung S (2009) Synthesis of the digital mock-up system for heterogeneous CAD assembly. Comput Ind 60:285–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sun G (2007) A digital mock-up visualization system capable of processing giga-scale CAD models. Comput Aided Des 39:133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mahesh M, Ong SK, Nee AYC, Fuh JYH, Zhang YF (2007) Towards a generic distributed and collaborative digital manufacturing. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 23:267–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chiu WK, Yu KM (2008) Direct digital manufacturing of three-dimensional functionally graded material objects. Comput Aided Des 40:1080–1093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vesprille K (2008) Model-based definition drives process change. Available at CADCAMNet,
  9. 9.
    Sudarsan R, Fenves SJ, Sriram RD, Wang F (2005) A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Comput Aided Des 37(13):1399–1411Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dassault Systémès CATIA V5. Available at
  11. 11.
    Siemens PLM Automation: NX, TeamCenter. Available at
  12. 12.
    Qiu ZM, Kok KF, Wong YS, Fuh JYH (2007) Role-based 3D visualisation for asynchronous PLM collaboration. Comput Ind 58:747–755Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clare M. BCA IS–CAS CPD, new technology, tools & processes. The quest for a PC CAD viewer at Boeing commercial airplanes. Available at
  14. 14.
    Feng SC, Song EY (2000) Information modeling of conceptual design integrated with process planning. Proceedings of the ASE DET CIDFMGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ASME Y14.5 (2009) Dimensioning and tolerancing, engineering drawings and related documentation practices. Available at
  16. 16.
  17. 17.
    3D XML Technology. Available at
  18. 18.
    Franceschini F (2003) Quality function deployment. Il Sole 24 Ore, Milano, ItalyGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Symmonds M (2005) PLM metrics. Boeing Technology, SeattleGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Alemanni M, Grimaldi A, Tornincasa S, Vezzetti E (2008) Key performance indicators for PLM benefits evaluation: the Alcatel Alenia Space case study. Comput Ind 59:833–841Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Alenia Aeronautica S.p.A.TurinItaly
  2. 2.Dipartimento di Sistemi di Produzione Ed Economia dell’AziendaPolitecnico di TorinoTurinItaly

Personalised recommendations