Abstract
Manufacturers need precise tools to simulate, validate, or improve a process plan for given tolerances. Some simulation methods calculating position and orientation defect of manufactured surfaces have already been developed. A lack in these methods is the integration of form defect of surfaces. Indeed, many methods do not study manufactured surfaces, but nominal models associated to these surfaces. The method developed in this article proposes a tool describing precisely form error in order to take it into account. The work is based on a method of the literature, using discrete cosine transformation, completed by a method for identification of classical defects composing global form error and quantification of their contribution to this defect. The method is validated on simulation examples and then applied on a milled plane.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Mathieu L, Ballu A (2005) A model for a coherent and complete tolerancing process, 9th CIRP Seminar on Computer Aided Tolerancing, Arizona, 35–44
Anselmetti B (2006) Generation of functional tolerancing based on positioning features. Comput Aided Des 38:909–919
Giordano M, Kataya B, Pairel E (2003) Tolerance analysis and synthesis by means of clearance and deviation spaces, selected article 7th CIRP. Academic Publishers, Kluwer, pp 145–154
Ryu SH, Chu CN (2005) The form error reduction in side wall machining using successive down and up milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1523–1530
Yun W-S, Ko JH, Cho D-W, Ehmann KF (2002) Development of a virtual machining system, part 2: prediction and analysis of a machined surface error. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:1607–1615
Dépincé P, Hascoët J-Y (2006) Active integration of tool deflection effects in end milling. Part 1: prediction of milled surfaces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:937–944
Tichadou S, Legoff O, Hascoët J-Y (2005) 3D Geometrical simulation of manufacturing. Compared approaches between integrated CAD/CAM system and small displacement torsor model, Advances in integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering, p. 446–456, Kluwer, Dordecht
Vignat F, Villeneuve F (2005) Simulation of the manufacturing process (2): Analysis of its consequence on a functional tolerance, Proceedings of the 9th CIRP Computer Aided Tolerancing Seminar, Tempe, Arizona
Dimas E, Briassoulis D (1999) 3D geometric modeling based on NURBS: a review. Adv Eng Softw 30:741–751
Samper S, Formosa F (2007) Defects tolerancing by natural modes analysis. J Comput Inform Sci Eng 7(1):44–51
Ahmed N, Natarajan T, Rao KR (1974) Discrete Cosine Transform. IEEE Transactions on Computers 90–93
Josso B, Burton DR, Lalor MJ (2002) Frequency normalised wavelet transform for surface roughness analysis and characterisation. Wear 252:491–500
Huang W, Ceglarek D (2002) Mode-based decomposition of part form error by discrete-cosine-transform with implementation to assembly and stamping system with compliant parts. CIRP Ann Manufact Tech 51(1):21–26
Legoff O, Tichadou S, Hascoët J-Y (2004) Manufacturing errors modeling: two three dimensional approaches. Int J Eng Manufact 218-Part B:1869–1873
Raja J, Muralikrishnan B, Fu S (2002) Recent advances in separation of roughness, waviness and form. Precis Eng 26:222–235
Mezghani S, Zahouani H (2004) Characterization of the 3D waviness and roughness motifs. Wear 257:1250–1256
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lecompte, J., Legoff, O. & Hascoet, JY. Technological form defects identification using discrete cosine transform method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51, 1033–1044 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2687-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2687-2