Advertisement

Early castability evaluation using analytical hierarchy process

  • Durgesh JoshiEmail author
  • Bhallamudi Ravi
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Abstract

Design for manufacture usually implies applying various guidelines derived from previous experience to improve part design so it is more compatible with the capabilities of the selected process, resulting in better quality and lower cost. The guidelines can be formulated as dimensionless criteria, enabling quantitative evaluation of a particular aspect of part design. There is, however, no good way to compare two or more designs for all aspects, considering that they may not be equally important. In this work, we employ analytical hierarchy process to determine the relative weights of various criteria for castability evaluation. The criteria are categorised in a three-level hierarchy, with the middle level comprising mould, feeding and gating groups. The prioritisation of criteria along with consistency checking of pair-wise comparisons enables a systematic evaluation of alternative product designs for manufacturability. The methodology is illustrated by modifying the product and tooling design of a grey iron bracket casting and estimating the improvement in manufacturability. The results are supported by experiments.

Keywords

Design for manufacture Castability Analytical hierarchy process 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Andreasen MM, Hein L (1997) Integrated product development. IFS, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Magrab E (1997) Integrated product and process design and development. CRC, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    ASM (1962) Casting design handbook. American Society of Metals, OhioGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Steel Founders’ Society of America (1973) Risering steel castings. http://www.sfsa.org/
  5. 5.
    ASM (1990) Metal handbook volume 15 casting. American Society of Metals, OhioGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bralla J (1990) Handbook of product design for manufacturing. McGraw-Hill Book, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campbell J (2004) Castings practice the 10 rules of casting. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ravi B (2005) Metal casting—computer aided design and analysis. Prentice Hall, IndiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gupta SK, Regli WC, Das D, Nau DS (1997) Automated manufacturability analysis: a survey. Res Eng Design—Theory Appl Concurrent Eng 9(3):p168–p190Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ravi B, Srinivasan MN (1995) Features-based castability evaluation. Int J Prod Res 33(12):p3367–p3380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Saaty T (1994) Highlights and critical points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 74(3):426–447zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Saaty T (1994) How to make decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24(6):19–43CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Akarte M, Surendra N, Ravi B, Rangraj N (2001) Web-based casting supplier evaluation using analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 52:p511–p522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tiwari M, Banerjee R (2001) A decision support system for the selection of a casting process using analytic hierarchy process. Prod Plan Control 12(7):p689–p694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chougule RG, Ravi B (2005) Variant process planning of casting using AHP-based nearest neighbor algorithm for case retrieval. Int J Prod Res 43(6):1255–1273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ravi B, Srinivasan MN (1996) Casting solidification analysis by modulus vector method. Int J Cast Met Res 9:1–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ravi B, Creese RC, Ramesh D (1999) Design for casting—a new paradigm for preventing potential problems. Trans Am Foundry Soc 107:p197–p202Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ravi B, Joshi D (2007) Feedability analysis and optimization driven by casting simulation. Indian Foundry J 53(6):71–78Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravi B, Joshi D, Kamalesh S. (2008) Part, tooling and method optimization driven by simulation and cost model. 68th World Foundry Congress, Chennai, Feb 7–10, pp 261–266Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Joshi D, Ravi B (2008) Comparison of finite element method and vector element method for casting solidification simulation. Indian Foundry J 54(9):21–27Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Joshi D, Ravi B (2009) Classification and simulation based design of 3D junctions in castings. Trans Am Foundry Soc 117:p7–p22Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SGS Institute of Technology and ScienceIndoreIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations